![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/7450b76e-1e05-471a-9df4-7e0a5520285d.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
As far as I can tell, yes
As far as I can tell, yes
I think there’s some misunderstanding
I get how IPv6 works, I got a /48 from my ISP. The problem is that I have some 15 devices here that I have to refer to in DNS and either I have to change their static IPs or I have to change their IPs in DNS if the prefix ever changes (it shouldn’t, because I pay for them to not do that). My laptop, phone and desktop do not get a static IPv6 and use the privacy extension. Is that not how you’re supposed to do it?
if your prefix ever changes you’ll have to update it everywhere
I mean that’s a good point but I’m paying money to not have my prefix changed. If I were to do it the intended way using DNS, how would I set up the DNS to be prefix agnostic? How would I reference devices in the firewall?
Very useful, but I don’t understand concept 1, “Don’t pick numbers”.
If I’m right, it’s basically saying don’t do stuff manually, just let the computer do it. I kind of disagree with this. All of my fixed devices have a fixed IP that I manually assigned and derived from the original v4 schema I also have. For example 192.168.x.y becomes prefix::y
Am I misunderstanding something?
I’ve seen AC temperature controllers in this form factor. The outer ring can spin and will let you turn the temperature up or down. It is usually part of a larger smart-home system but it doesn’t have to be.
My solution to this has been a catchall on my domain.
And what’s that?
signed filthy debian user
I’ve gotten contacted before so I assume that’s all gravy. Anyway, my relay is healthy and up to date as far as I can tell.
I do assume that me not being a guard anymore is just some automatic defensive mechanism that’ll sort itself out in the long run; not too worried about it, just curious.
I could point out why, but I’d probably get banned
e: this is a dumb comment and I regret making it. What I was referring to was literally right in the opening of the article:
Eric Maurice, researcher at the European Policy Centre, said there are numerous factors behind the discontent.
‘‘It’s true that on the one hand, we can see in the election results a rise in the extremes, in the radical forces, on both the right and the left, with an increasingly uninhibited political language, in verbal violence, in ad hominem attacks in political debate too. And then a radicalisation, a polarisation of society and a difficulty in debating with political adversaries who often become enemies,’’ he said.
I read the title, made a bunch of assumptions and then posted my comment without reading the article.
I just assumed they’d know more about it than me! I am very dumb, especially on the topics of cryptography.
My relay has gone from running as primarily a guard to exclusively as a middle since the 14th. Why would it do that, if Tor needs more guards?
I’m no expert but as far as I’ve understood it you need to generally have a very good understanding of the train you’re driving, equivalent to an actual engineering degree, because you’re the person who has to call central and tell them what’s wrong with your train when something happens and “It doesn’t go forward” isn’t useful.
Not exactly. It was far more in the past.
what the f are you doing that you need to vet this many businesses in such a short time span?
I seriously don’t look at the reviews; I don’t even use google maps because it’s useless to me as a pedestrian.
GoogleMaps reviews are fake in favor of corporations, it’s useless data
This is the less edg version of my naming scheme; greek gods
That’s not what this law is about, but yes actually they do!
I’m not even in the UK and my domains get hit by UK authorities that claim to be scanning for vulnerabilities
I just use Firefox with extensions on mobile honestly
I don’t think you understand. I know privacy extension is for outbound and not inbound, but what use is it on a server?