it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.
An animal. Shaped as a fit, sexy woman. Shared on Lemmy. Yeah, not horny. Sure.
it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.
An animal. Shaped as a fit, sexy woman. Shared on Lemmy. Yeah, not horny. Sure.
Wait. Isn’t this a Firefox extension that a lot of people like? Not me specifically, but I’m surprised by your comment having a lot of upvotes.
Edit: ah, it’s not upvotes, it’s downvotes lol!
You’re not wrong, but it’s not completely toast yet.
You’re right in that I might consider alternatives soon, though.
I did it with Phoenix back in the Communicator days (which eventually became Firefox.)
Lol office goods! :)
They do feel like that now. But back in the day, I thought it was the apogee of technology, so handling them (buying them, playing, sharing) was really cool.
But then, I was 14.
No, not really.
Because many of those videos won’t be replayed over and over again. It’s like recording fireworks. Almost pointless. You may as well just enjoy the concert (edit: without videotaping it.)
The tape recording, though, you bet it was enjoyed countless of times!
Are capybaras docile to humans?
Ok, sure. But this is common knowledge. Private browsing is about not leaving trace on the local machine. It was never about remaining anonymous on the internet.
I thought you were referring to the browser sending browsing history to Google somehow.
Wait… private tabs sends info to Google? How? Do you mean by clicking analytics links?
Ha, cool! It’s been a while since I saw that movie.
Man, 1998?! Time flies.
What’s this in reference to?
“Upgrade your hardware to run the latest versions.”
lol! :)
So you’re* looking to build (etc)
Yeah, yeah, but it surely beats creating gigantic props, or miniatures, like back in the 70s and 80s in terms of costs.
Which is exactly my point. It’s not CG, the technology, that’s expensive. It’s the human factor surrounding it.
Hmmmm… if a movie starts with stupid plot points in the first few minutes, and not in an ironic/satirical way (e.g. “I’m alone in a park - what’s that noise in the dark? Let’s investigate!” or “Everyone is carrying a gun. I’ll fight them with my katana sword!”) then I kind of know what I’m getting myself into for the rest of the movie.
Same deal.
Not that I think that CGI is cheap, but spending millions in computer graphics with today’s powerful hardware sounds absurd. So, something else must be it.
Edit: Oh, please. CGI is cheaper than actual props. ET the movie would be way cheaper to remake today than 40 years ago.
As we integrate Anonym into the Mozilla family
Hoo-boy. I hope this goes well…!
Hey thanks for explaining!
Oh yeah, because when I see Egyptian hieroglyphs, I think sexy beasts.
The point is not the anthropomorphism. The point is related tothe deliberate sexual undertone. And I’m not even a prude. I don’t care much about what people prefer. It’s just that the Internet broke us.
It’s like the word “cuck” (ugh.) A scholar may use it in the utmost right context, and yet, all that word does is infuriate me because of the overuse the The_Donald crowd gave to it.