I’m trying to imagine voluntarily buying a device that all but prohibits you from choosing the software you run on it. A limit of 2-3 apps, which have to be re-signed weekly by a desktop server, to me that doesn’t count as “supporting sideloading.” Maybe technically. What a joke.

“Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power!” -Android users

Wait… You can sideload on ios? Since when?

Yep! The police, being fascists, HATE this.

Trying to imagine being the human who wrote that headline, sat back, and said “Yeah that’ll do!”

Lmao of course this is all you’ve got in response. This is why people don’t take you seriously.

Thank you, I read it over and over and thought I was going crazy.

Title gore. What is this headline trying to communicate?

Good to know!

Is it just me or is that absolute garbage quality for the price?

What?

Pretty sure I hugged it to death with the post. Was working fine for the last couple of days.

Ok cool, but I’ll still support this initiative, because as FUTO states, a keyboard should not connect to the internet.

You’re missing the whole anonymization layer they’ve implemented here. If actual typing data is used, the app can’t guarantee user control of the data after opt-in. The data they’re using here is not private user typing data to begin with.

I’d recommend listening to Louis Rossman’s talks on the subject.

Data is data! You’re a use case, regardless of swipe ability.

The entire point of the keyboard is that it’s not built in. The philosophy behind the organization making it says that it shouldn’t be built in.

Nope

No noticeable difference.

Do you have the LLM fine tuning enabled? Mine is pretty good after a few months of training it.

I thought so too! FUTO is a project worth supporting in my opinion.