

money for what? EVs are not more expensive than fossil cars


money for what? EVs are not more expensive than fossil cars
Thanks for the lengthy reply. What worries me is not that people are not educated enough and use their own circle of trust to build their opinion. If it would be the case it could be solved with discussions, education and facts.
Before the internet people (including academics) were aware what they had no idea about almost everything except their own field. Can you imagine John Doe talking about virology or climate dynamics in a bar in 1990? People would have had a good laugh about him. Today people think they are competent in a field after watching a few ragebait videos. The other thing is that once they picked a team they stick to it, admitting they were wrong is out of the question. If you correct them with facts it is considered arrogant. They are unable to keep a consistent standpoint even between single questions of a discussion. For example if they start with “climate change does not exist” and you then show them a temperature chart of the last centuries they immediately switch to “yeah, but it is not human made”. After asking where the carbon in the oil goes after oxidizing its “ok its human made but a few degrees wont be a problem” and so on.
I don’t see how this can be countered anytime soon. Even the last summer here in Europe didn’t change much. People still vote the same parties. That is idiotic. At least believe your own eyes dammit…
My hope is that the younger generations will not give in to the same bullshit. Unfortunately, until they are the majority we’re already in deep shit territory.
I hope i’m wrong.
No need to be sorry, i’m here to discuss, thank you for the reply :)
So you see the billionaire problem as billionaries using their power to prevent necessary action. Ok, i agree that this is part of the problem.
But the “peope are selfish idiots” part is much larger.
The propaganda works because it is what people want to hear. And they want to hear that [climate change does not exist/wont be that bad/wont be worse than not burning fossils/but china/can not be stopped anyway] because they then dont have to change their lifestyle. And, at least in my bubble, “but the billionaires” (burning a lot more fuel with their yachts and private jets) or “but then only the rich can affort it” is another of these excuses.


where not?
It baffels me how many here seem to think that climate change is a billionaire problem. Are you really serious about this? (genuine question)
What makes you think that way? Its so obviously not true.
Look around you. Imagine you can see CO2. Coming out of the cars around you, the airplanes overhead, trucks and cargo ships delivering your consumer goods, tractors and harvesters on the nearby fields. Are the cars Ferrairs? The planes private jets? The trucks and cargo ships transporting exquisite furniture? The farmers producing kobe beef?
Must be comfortable in your world…


People often dont get that these gears/driving modes are only different mappings of the drivers inputs. At no time the car uses the friction brakes when it could also use regen braking.


deleted by creator


yes and dont forget all the billionaires at the airport
/s


why would that matter?


7k plus for not having to use a cable… how degenerate can you be?


The only thing thats dangerous for Trump is that ruining the future becomes too expensive.
In Europe people vote for russia friendly right wing parties for the same reason.
Says a lot about the state of western societies.


Western media: …alleged war crimes…


“Tesla casts their frames around a battery” is a long way from “Tesla cast aluminum frames on model Y are integrated with the battery pack”
But yeah, saving a few % of weight and a few minutes fastcharging time should not make a simple battery repair such as a cell replacement much more difficult.


I’m all for standardization but the battery will usually outlast the car. What do you mean Tesla casts their frames around a battery?


because emissions from food production?


I’d also like to add that the manufacturing footprint can (and hopefully will be) reduced. So the difference will grow. Fossil cars will not get more efficient. Also fuck cars.


well otherwise they would be pretty useless
oh wow, helping a nation in its fight for literal survival against a totalitarian imperial state which
is now “being enthusiastic about having a proxy war on Russia”