Impeachment, but that starts with a 218 vote in the House and the House is on his side.
At no point did Biden ever, once, tell Israel to continue killing Palestinians. The support was provided for defense from Iran, full stop.
What Israel chose to do with that support is on Israel, not Biden.
Removed again for misinformation and temp banned.
I’d bet that nobody’s record states “DEI HIRE” so they’ll just purge all the women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ employees.
Biden, not once, ever, stated “full throated support for genocide”.
Removed for misinformation.
As stated the last time this was posted:
Rule 1: Not US Internal News.
An American President, pardoning an American criminal, serving time in America, is NOT world news.
Zionist, in the modern sense, is more or less the Jewish equivalence of white supremacy.
They believe they have a divine right to the lands of Israel and everyone else who lives there can get bent.
Rule 1: Not US Internal News.
An American President, pardoning an American criminal, serving time in America, is NOT world news.
What most Americans don’t get is how Israel has been doing this shit for DECADES now. Gaza, West Bank, Golan, Lebanon.
Unless you know people over there, you aren’t aware of even 1/2 the crap they’re doing.
I had hoped it might have changed when they bulldozed an American, it did not.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Corrie
Jesus, next year she’ll have been dead as many years as she was alive.
Anyone paying attention?
continue accelerate.
In fairness, Jenin is in the West Bank, not Gaza.
Yeah, I get it. My company has been in a hiring freeze since 2021. :( “But hey! We aren’t laying anyone off!” - Yeah, we aren’t replacing anyone either…
:( Sorry to hear it! Hope it doesn’t take 4 years to get back up again.
Any possible leads in local government? I guess that would depend on the locality.
Bolton had credible threats from Iran.
If I were to guess… it’s probably because the chemical makeup of energy drinks would damage the machine? Maybe it’s more acidic or something?
TBH I am 100% guessing here, talking out my ass, having done ZERO research on the topic.
Trump’s argument:
If someone is not here legally, then the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” doesn’t apply to them. Their kids aren’t citizens.
I guess now he has to explain how he can deport people who aren’t “subject to the jurisdiction”.
Saying China runs the Panama Canal is just bizarre to me.
Is he conflating the return of the canal to Panama in 1999 and the return of Hong Kong to China in 1997 as the same thing?
Not just L.A. either…
STILL offline.
Worse… The House makes the impeachment charge, that’s a 50% majority vote.
THEN it goes to the Senate for conviction where you need a 2/3rds majority to remove them. 67/100.
That’s the body which can’t do anything because they’re blocked by a 60 vote super majority to over-ride a filibuster.
So you get 218 in the House, goes to the Senate, needs 60 votes to end debate and proceed with charges, then 67 votes to convict and remove.
Trump’s first impeachment got 48 and 47 votes.
His second was 57 votes.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_trial_of_Donald_Trump
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump
If he had been convicted, he would have been inelligible to run in '24.