Hell, even in church elections.

Okay. I’ll give it to you - Finland allows it’s population more democracy-like privileges than you’d find in most other countries, and it probably isn’t even the only one that does that.

But tell me this… how many of the corporations Finnish people work for is democratically run?

which is what’s known as Democracy

Just because it’s “known” as “democracy” because politicians and their crony media capitalists have been throwing the word around for a few centuries doesn’t actually make it democracy.

It’s never “small government” when it comes to funding pig.

Oh no!

Anyway…

What they call “AI” is only “intelligent” within a capitalist frame of reference, too.

I’m guessing you’re having a real hard time understanding that there is absolutely NOTHING democratic about so-called “liberal democracy,” eh?

Why is that? Is the new information clashing with your programming?

Nah. They should just make sure the checks bounce.

They should send Alex Jones a $1 “royalty” check every month - just so that he doesn’t forget it.

You forget he also played Goldmember in the third movie.

So-called “liberal democracy” works pretty much the exact same way it does in Europe (or anywhere else) as it does in the US.

Ie, it’s 95% capitalism and 5% fake democracy substitute (the ratios vary slightly but never by much). And, like “liberal democracy” everywhere, the 5% fake democracy substitute will be rapidly replaced with 5% very not-fake fascism if you threaten the 95% capitalism part in any way whatsoever.

Right, right… like the US just did?

How’s that vote on healthcare coming along?

Look at Michael Flynn.

So, you chose an example from another country that also cannot win it’s wars despite an overwhelming technological and logistical advantage over it’s victims?

The Palestinians doesn’t seem to have any problems trusting theirs. I wonder why?

That’s because history

History is not an excuse to assign white supremacism any kind of “superiority.”

This seems like an emotional opinion.

Really? I find it funny that a person that claims to base their opinion on history doesn’t seem to understand the intimate link between liberalism and fascism.

Iirc the way these bases work is with the agreement from the host country country’s government and most definitely NOT the people of said country.

FTFY.

Does the rich deserve credit for failing upward?

If you think Palestine is going to survive for much longer,

The literal ex-commander of the Gaza division doesn’t share your denialism. about Israel’s chances.

Like I said… you give white supremacism a lot of credit.

So expect more of our BOOM BOOMs

You mean the ones that are already there?

Yes, and the last time they got REAL power it took millions of lives

Oh no… they were costing millions of lives looooong before Mussolini gave it a name. And western liberal society was perfectly fine with it both before and after as long as it remained in the colonized world.

It’s almost as if liberalism simply accepts that a bit of fascism every now and then is simply the cost of doing business.

Have they tried as hard as they’re trying right now?

Nope. They have never been this desperate.

Did they have someone named Donald Trump who was interested in helping them

The (so-called) “west” has been interested in helping them since 1948. That’s why they have the kind of firepower now they could only have dreamt of in 1948 - and they are failing nonetheless.

or at least entirely getting out of their way

The US isn’t standing in their way. Palestinians with RPG-7s are standing in their way.

white supremacists are willing to go when given enough power.

White supremacism gave itself all the power it wanted all over the world. And yet, despite this power, one by one the colonialist chickens was forced to come home to roost after the failure of white supremacism to remain dominant in the colonized world. It’s now the US’s turn to experience that failure.

He was the most friendliest, from a Western point of view.

Yeah, but not the most obedient. That’s why the west preferred Yeltsin - and his faithful number two, Putin.

Slavery being legal in the US.

Ooops, sorry, I forgot that it’s still perfectly legal in the US.

So, the US wants to lose the only influence it actually has on Europe?

I say go for it.

It’s easy to laugh at the right-wingers, but the truth is that this is the way power is measured by the patriarchy - control over other people’s bodies.

It doesn’t matter if this power is obtained through the use of laws, money or physical violence (it’s usually a combination of all three) - it’s the power that matters, and the patriarchy doesn’t care how it makes you look to the people you have that power over.