Yes, finally. This is exactly the kind of case I’m looking for. Now I can dig into the details of the court documents.
I mod a worryingly growing list of communities. Ask away if you have any questions or issues with any of the communities.
I also run the hobby and nerd interest website scratch-that.org.
Yes, finally. This is exactly the kind of case I’m looking for. Now I can dig into the details of the court documents.
That is just one of the things that seems very off to me about the claim.
my guess is that it happens sometimes
I just want to see one case.
Maybe someone on Lemmy has found one.
And so, my question.
I’ve seen the claim about Target online for years now, sometimes even with people in comments saying they know someone (or know someone who knows someone) that this happened to, but even after all this time no easily found court case. Nobody who ever says they have first hand knowledge ever comes back to say what case it is. It seems like this would be a slamdunk piece of content for one of the various YouTube channels that covers legal drama, but I haven’t seen it. None of the news articles covering Target’s Judge Dredd tier stoploss ever have an update linking to a case. I just want to see it.
As infamous as Target’s stoploss is, I figured people more plugged in would already know where to look.
Thanks, but not relevant to my question.
I just want to say, Plumber would be a great codename for a megacorp/government assassin that takes out would-be whistleblowers.
The plumber takes care of leaks.
Seems to be one of the movies where the themes eat the story. The trailer made it seem as such.
The Canterville Ghost, by Oscar Wilde.
I understand the turn of phrase. I don’t quite know what you mean in the application here.
I’m not sure if I entirely follow what you mean by “turning things on their head”. What are you getting at?
I’m not sure what you mean by this. The industrial revolutions were not just about burning coal.
Robber barons were in many ways also tied to coal.
Robber barons are just a more evocative way of framing the period compared to the dry Industrial Revolution term, similar to calling it the Gilded Age, but all the terms are roughly talking about the same time period.
Either of the first two Industrial Revolutions were not named because of the burning of coal in and of itself. Coal burning was part of the widespread and rapid transformation of society. Coal played a part in facilitating previously unthinkable changes in a short time.
The adoption of cars has been more iterative and gradual. In the U.S. there are certain periods important for them such as, depending on how much you think it had an effect, the General Motors streetcar conspiracy. There was also the post WW2 push by Eisenhower to building National highways. But those didn’t radically and quickly change life in the way industrial revolutions did. There was the post-war boom, which if you want to view it through a certain lens, was a kind of revolution for the U.S., in that people found themselves with much more buying power thanks to the U.S. having assumed superpower status.
Similarly nuclear power production has not caused widespread fundamental change in a short period. Nuclear weapons did become a major part of geopolitics, but nuclear power is as far as society is concerned just another way to make electricity.
They have been known to stop rifle bullets, but aren’t rated to do it. Essentially, they can, sometimes, but the manufacturer doesn’t promise it.
There are a lot of variables. He told me he could feel the tip poking at his forehead with his steps as he walked back.
I’m not sure I understand the question.
I once saw a guy wearing a helmet get shot. The bullet embedded into the helmet with the point touching his skin but not harm to him.
I agree. Tech communities have a habit of drastically over estimating how much everyone else cares about the details of tech.
Even something as simple as PC gaming scares off a lot of people because of the perception that you need to be some kind of tech wizard in order to cobble everything together to make a game run. Actual cobbling together of software to pirate (no matter how simple it seems to people in the know) is just a bunch of technobabble.
It is interesting to me that the chorus always talking about “switching” to piracy after every incident is also intimately familiar with piracy already. Almost as if it’s just people who already pirate talking to each other about how hard they are going to pirate. Meanwhile general audiences don’t care.
It interests me.