• 1 Post
  • 523 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • It is just a comic, just like trump is just joking about Tariffs and infact the very idea of him ever getting elected is a meme and a joke, or the Flat Earth theory, that is sooooo funny, or how about the Tide Pod challenge, wasn’t that funny??? Or remember all that time ago when school shootings were a Joke? Wasn’t that sooooooooo funny ??? 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣




  • It does mean people have the right to hear, and When high profile people are able to censor it is taking away from the open market of ideas as much as any government, sure, you specifically do not have to argue anything, and I am ok with that but it is a fine line to censorship, including for other political powers or corporations, it happens in real life with real influencers all the time.


  • First things first, what is a government? Because many corporations have more soft and hard power than the majority of all governments through history, the same can be said about certain influencers, is it simply the Monopoly on violence? Because that seems awfully arbitrary and means any bully is a government, I would argue the principal behind it is far more important than some arbitrary definition of government that even international bodies don’t agree on.

    Second thing second, sure, many, people argue in bad faith, many are improper many are etc but certainly not all and certainly not every influencer or company should be the absolute arbiter of Truth and moral.





  • EDIT: Fixed grammar with AI.

    The word deviant doesn’t have a concrete meaning in scientific terms.

    So, no—objectively speaking, gay people are not “deviant,” since morality is a human construct. (And even if it weren’t, that would be a philosophical question.)

    The best way I could reframe this question is:

    A. Are we evolutionarily predisposed to find people with alternative* sexual preferences distasteful or unpleasant?

    B. Are alternative* sexual preferences evolutionarily harmful to society?

    C. Are alternative* sexual preferences harmful to an individual’s own evolutionary success?

    D. If any of the above are true, is the psychological or societal damage so detrimental—either to the individual or to society—that it would still be preferable to engage in alternative* sexual desires?

    In this context, “alternative” refers to anything outside of a heterosexual relationship. However, these questions can be narrowed down to whatever specific sexual preferences you are inquiring about.


    I won’t offer my own opinion on this, nor will I present any scientific evidence. But I will say this: I don’t think the issue is as black and white as some might assume.


  • You should always Question everything, If someone tells you not to question it, question it Harder.

    If it is the Truth then it doesn’t matter if you Question it or not, and nobody should care if you question it

    If it’s a Lie, then You need to know why you’re being lied to, you need to know who benefits from it, you need to know if the Lie was worth suppression of the Truth.

    If your life is truly better with the Lie it is always better to know and make that decision for yourself, never let others dictate what you believe because it is better for them, If you are going to follow a Lie make sure it is in your best interest. Because anyone will tell you a lie to help themselves but no one will willingly work against their own self interest.