- 11 Posts
- 107 Comments
2·2 months agoThis doesn’t seem to be open source
1·2 months agosadly no, but it is on all platforms and at least more secure than other closed source messenger
I’ve never understood why a messaging app would require blockchain to function. Storing all text and images on the blockchain seems redundant—especially when end-to-end encryption is already in place. With E2EE, no one can modify your messages without access to your private key.
It’s a shame they broke Perfect forward secrecy. To me, this is a very important feature to have in any E2EE system.
well briar does not have calling on desktop (in stable yet at least), also jami can do video and screen share
that’s good to know.
what most p2p chats lack is users.
Exactly. In order to attract more users to Jami, I really think the user interface should be improved.
session is not p2p.
you are right, Session is not purely peer-to-peer.
thanks!
thanks a lot!
Syncthing doesn’t only work on LAN, it can work through any network interface including Tailscale and yggdrasil, and has public relay nodes in case you don’t. I’m pretty sure you can also host your own relay nodes if you want to.
didn’t know this, thank you!
11·3 months agoagree, please prove the governments of Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea are terrorists
Whoops you forgot to add that that was from an edit :3
it is not, this comment is for you and it is not edited
AND here’s the really fun part - That’s you highlighting comments! See how that is just part of the discussion? Neat how communication works, right?
I don’t understand
I don’t understand
waste of resources
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: waste of resources is better than terrorism
people are obviously scared
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: they shouldn’t be and I’m not scared.
Removed by mod
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…
Public surveillance from government is what we are discussing, please do not mix it up with voyeurism
Why is that? Surveillance can still be helpful if all people are targeted.
Good for you, but I cannot afford to replicate your approach. Thank you for the responses
More surveillance = more crime detected, do I need to prove 1+1=2 for you as well?
FYI voice mail are surveilled
Your are lucky if your friends and parents don’t use facebook, but I’m not so lucky and I’m asking for help
yes I’m looking for something to run locally. Thanks a lot for the suggestions!