• NegativeInf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the intent of the law, not some accidental consequence.

    First, make government appear non-functional.

    Second, protect child rapists.

    Fuck republicans, conservatives, fascists and all their ilk.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Third, make more kids to rape because abortion is illegal and the great population collapse is coming!!!

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is even the argument for denying a child medical care?

    Yes, we all know this is insane and stupid, but for the sake of trying to understand, what is the best argument in favour of this?

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While generally the phrase “the cruelty is the point” is a great way to show how Republican ideas hurt society, I don’t think it applies here. The law is meant to hurt trans people, or children who are sexually active, not kids who were raped by their parents.

    • alphanerd4@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Def meant to put a point on … exactly how would you actually be able to tell where that line of intentionality is? and more to point, … does it matter, really, a system is what it does and intention is irrelevant. They meant to do something