The newspaper's billionaire owner broke his silence Monday night, arguing that presidential endorsements create the "perception of bias" and don't "tip the scales" of an election.
how exactly is it that any kind of endorsement creates a “perception of bias”? is he trying to argue that all opinions are biased? and if so, why doesn’t he say anything to support that claim?
how exactly is it that any kind of endorsement creates a “perception of bias”? is he trying to argue that all opinions are biased? and if so, why doesn’t he say anything to support that claim?