German police arrested a Saudi Arabian man after a deadly car-ramming attack on a Christmas market Friday in which an SUV barrelled through a crowd of revellers at high speed, leaving a trail of bloody carnage.
At least two people were killed, one of them a young child, and 68 injured, said authorities in the city of Magdeburg, located about 130 kilometres (80 miles) southwest of Berlin.
The suspect was a 50-year-old medical doctor from Saudi Arabia living in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, said regional premier Reiner Haseloff, speaking at a scene cordoned off and guarded by police commandos. “We have arrested the perpetrator, a man from Saudi Arabia, a doctor who has been in Germany since 2006,” he told reporters, calling the attack a “catastrophe” for the city and the country. “From what we currently know he was a lone attacker so we don’t think there is any further danger.”
German media partially named the suspect as Taleb A. and said he was a doctor of psychiatry.
The black BMW barrelled through the crowd at high speed just after 7:00 pm local time (1800 GMT) when the market was filled with revellers.
Police said the vehicle drove “at least 400 metres across the Christmas market” leaving a trail of bloodied casualties, debris and broken glass at the city’s central town hall square. Ambulances and fire engines rushed to the chaotic site, which was doused in blue police lights and wailing sirens, as badly injured people were treated on site and rushed off to hospitals.
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier wrote that “the anticipation of a peaceful Christmas was suddenly interrupted” in the attack but he cautioned that “the background to the terrible deed has yet been clarified”. The leader of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), Alice Weidel, which has focused on jihadist attacks in its campaign against immigrants, wrote on X “when will this madness stop?” The Saudi government expressed “solidarity with the German people and the families of the victims”, in a statement on social media platform X, and “affirmed its rejection of violence”. French President Emmanuel Macron said he was “profoundly shocked” by the attack and that he “shares the pain of the German people”. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also condemned the “brutal attack on the defenceless crowd” and Spain’s prime minister Pedro Sanchez voiced his sorrow at the “terrible attack”.
I mean fuck cars but this was not an infrastructure issue here lol
Preventing cars from being used as weapons is an infrastructure issue.
After the 2017 attacks in Stockholm, the street where the attack happened now has proud concrete lions ensuring that a future attack of that kind will be more than likely to fail. These lions are infrastructure.
Car attacks on Christmas markets are a well known threat in Germany and most Christmas markets have some form of security infrastructure like concrete blocks or armed police by now. Concrete blocks only work if they are interconnected, otherwise they have little to no stopping effect.
Private cars, that can hide attackers, have no business anywhere near urban cores, pedestrianised zones or Christmas markets.
Every pedestrianized area should have bollards or another devices preventing cars from entering the area, this can prevent violent attacks like this as well as drunk driving incidents.
Or attackers can start going after executives like Luigi. Win win
Revolutions tend to eat their children or something like that. Keeping an attack surface like that open for the sole purpose of scaring the ruling or owning classes is inefficient in the trauma economy of change. Luigi was so effective because the targeting was bullseye - almost no one else symbolises what is wrong with US healthcare like the existence of healthcare insurance CEOs. Christmas markets and private cars on the other hand are infrastructure used by millions. Luigi did not go amok in a hospital, he chose one of those targets most responsible for his suffering.
Not every member of the fuck cars community is about car infrastructure, even though I personally fall into the infrastructure camp.
Say you have the viewpoint that guns should be tightly controlled due to the number of people killed by them. Cars kill approximately the same number of people in the US every year (depending on if you count suicides and if intent is important). If guns are bad for deadly external behaviors, then so are cars. Just like how there are gun ranges or race tracks for responsible ownership, there can be gun related murder and car related murder. Ban guns and ban cars.
Case in point is this very article. It appears to be a hate related crime committed with a car. Germany tightly controls gun ownership, so why would we dismiss tight control of car ownership? Should we allow this person to drive again if he’s convicted? Why do we allow DUI drivers, who have killed others before, to continue to drive again? What do devices like ignition interlocks say about us?
If they’re not, they’re confused because that’s squarely what the entire movement is about.
Are they? I’ve seen plenty of well-liked memes of banning cars as well as guns. There are popular posts about banning cars entirely from various developments. Or outright hate and venting when another ghost bike gets installed.
IMHO, the urbanist movement is more focused on infrastructure than fuck cars. Fuck cars is more encompassing than just urbanism and civil engineering.
The use of cars as intentional, or drunk/careless, murder weapons is a genuine anti-car issue. That most killings with cars get very low punishment, especially with a claim of carelessness/innattentiveness, makes it easy to cover up murder, and a “fuck cars” issue.