• LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t get tricked by big media the way they did with the McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit.

    Google was notified for a decade that they had a dangerous route listed. Safety standards aren’t made for people acting perfectly, they’re made for having multiple layers of safety for things that can kill or maime you.

    Yes, there is SOME level of personal responsibility, but if Google told 100,000 people to do something dangerous, it’s inevitable that someone would have a combination of factors that caused someone to do it and die.

    Google just claims over and over that it’s too big and has too much data to be able to have any sort of customer service or maintenance, and this is the result.

    Yes, other people are also responsible, but that’s what the legal system is for, to look at evidence and not headlines and place blame. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google settles out of court on this one and promises to fix their maps.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google just claims over and over that it’s too big and has too much data

      “ok, google. how many pieces should you be sliced into in order to rectify this?”

    • inasaba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This kind of thing is why I hate Google Maps. There is no way to ensure that edits are carried out based on your local knowledge, whereas with OpenStreetMap you can just go make the changes that need to be made. It’s been very satisfying for me to go contribute to OpenStreetMap when I see that paths are added or changed, so that the map reflects reality. Meanwhile Google Maps won’t even move an entire park that is in the wrong place.

    • jsdz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maps have been around for thousands of years and have always been unreliable. You’d think the legal principles involved would be well explored by now.

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s commonly used as an example of a frivolous lawsuit, because everyone knows coffee is hot right? Of course coffee can burn you.

        The issue is that this particular coffee was negligently hot, so hot that the victim had third-degree burns on her privates. Also, the victim originally only sought coverage for medical expenses, but instead McD went to court and had to pay out a much larger amount.

        Anyone who thinks this lawsuit was frivolous, try to find some of the pictures of her burns.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The media reporting was that is was frivolous, someone burned themselves on coffee and wanted to blame McDonald’s. That wasn’t the full story.

        • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it was super super hot, like you said. It was handed off to some grandma, the lid popped off, and the super hot coffee spilled all over this very old woman’s inner thighs. There were pictures.

          Old people have notoriously thin skin. Literally. So this hot-ass coffee burns this old woman’s thin skin, and I think the resulting burns needed to be fixed via hospital visits & maybe surgery. So yeah it wasn’t a frivolous lawsuit.