Does anyone else feel as if it’s over when it comes to really owning your own things?

As of now:

  • You don’t have the option of having a phone with decent specs and replaceable parts
  • You have to have really good knowledge in tech to have private services that are on par with what the big companies offer
  • You have to put up with annoying compatibility issues if you install a custom ROM on your android phone
  • You cannot escape apps preventing you from using them if you root your device
  • Cars are becoming SaaS bullcrap
  • Everything is going for a subscription model in general

And now Google is attempting to implement DRM on websites. If that goes through, Firefox is going to be relegated to privacy conscious websites (there aren’t many of those). At this point, why even bother? Why do I go to great lengths at protecting my privacy if it means that I can’t use most services I want?

It sucks because the obvious solution is for people to move away from these bullshit companies and show that they actually care about their privacy. Even more important is to actually PAY for services they like instead of relying on free stuff. I’m not optimistic not just because the non privacy conscious side is lazy, but because my side is greedy. I mean one of the most popular communities on lemmy is “piracy” which makes it all the more reasonable for companies not to listen to privacy conscious people.

I wouldn’t say that this is the endgame but in this trajectory, privacy is gone before 2030.

  • Thalestr@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly? As I get older and as the tech industry chokes itself to death in pursuit of infinite profit, I find myself doing more and more things away from the computer or the internet at the very least. Spending time outside doing stuff, exercising, reading books, partaking in art or other creative pursuits, having pets, etc. I have really dialed back my social media involvement and I hardly ever use my phone now.

    The internet is absolute garbage now. It’s a completely unregulated trash fire that is only getting hotter as more gasoline gets dumped on it. The internet I grew up with, the internet of seemingly endless possibility and unfathomable amounts of information, is long gone. Search results (from any engine) are all SEO trash, websites are just AI-generated garbage covered in ads, and every app or service is a subscription that promises to suck even more money out of my bank account for basic services. Not to mention that all of the above will also monitor every single bit of my activity and sell it to third party buyers. If tech is just going to exist to be an ad-delivery platform then I can do without it. People did for decades, centuries, and we can too.

    This bubble is going to pop eventually. It not might be today or tomorrow, but it is going to happen. This is not sustainable.

    • Tocano@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The internet is absolute garbage now

      Well, it always was. The internet was always filled with low effort webpages with ads from top to bottom. The only change is that as people got better at avoiding the old scams, new ones appeared with better CSS and more psychological manipulation.

      ad-delivery platform

      It is basically this. Most websites just try and dig into your profile, masking it as “personalized customer service”, but the real intention is to know what you do, who you talk to, and try to sell you goods & services.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        It definitely wasn’t always that. Sure, there were lazy, greedy, fuckers in the early internet putting up crap content and “you’re the 1 millionth visitor, you win an iPhone!” Pop-ups, but for a good decade or more the internet was filled with passion projects. Websites and services built from passion and desire, not for an endless pursuit of money. When corporations were ignoring the internet as a fad, it was a remarkable place. Once they realized how much money Google and MySpace were making, they all jumped in head first and began the rapid enshitification of the digital frontier. The same type of people that ruined the physical frontier ruined the digital one as well. Pinche jotos.

      • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not always. Believe it or not it used to be kinda like it is now, here.

        With the technical barriers to entry pre AOL the people online were outcasts, nerds, and science departments at universities. The ad driven model is the attempt to lower barriers of entry make profit of that and not the other way around. Lots of the Internet ran on generosity and donations.

        It’s been shittier every day after there was an agreement on how to monetize though. The people at the start didn’t ever have the guarantee it would get adopted, so for all the idealism we deal with their compromises.

    • float@waveform.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the way. I’m basically only online at work now. Once I’m home I just smoke a bowl and relax offline. I’ve been making music a bunch lately and going on photo walks. I used to play video games to pass the time but even those are awful now.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sucks because the obvious solution is for people to move away from these bullshit companies and show that they actually care about their privacy.

    They don’t. People don’t care, don’t understand, and don’t care that they don’t understand. The average person is oblivious of the way the world around them works, and they’re okay with that. Ignorance is bliss, after all.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The truth makes for tough reading. Now for the good news: imagine all the free software you use every day, and all the people who built it with passion and countless hours of hard work, and - not least! - how much more powerful that software is than it was even a decade ago.

      It seems that the ignorant masses are not entirely in the driving seat, right?

      • Vinnyboiler@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ignorance goes both sides though, free and open source has dark aspects to it. The assumed security has no one to hold to account, and for profit companies has real leverage over projects and can hurt the ecosystem if given a chance. Add to that how lax the wider community attitude is to breaking licences and you have a ecosystem that can fail if all you do is assume good faith.

        Remember to keep an open mind to everything and not just the things in life you have a particular issue with. Everyone is ignorant to something.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remember to keep an open mind to everything and not just the things in life you have a particular issue with.

          FYI this presumptuous and gratuitously patronizing remark undermines the rest of your comment.

  • 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    It comes in cycles. 20 years ago, it was a struggle to maintain your digital freedom. 10 years ago, when everyone was basking in free software and low interest rates, it was quite easy. The industry is contracting again, so it’s going to be harder to do so while using commercial offerings. But we will find ways and the cycle will repeat.

    Persist.

      • 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ughhh long story…

        It was the height of the Desktop era. Everything ran locally, and that meant Windows. OS X just got started. Everyone was predicting smartphones, but they were a decade out (note time travellers: drop the fucking stylus). Linux was unbelievably shit. Very few drivers, you had to carefully pick your hardware. External devices were a luxury. Printing mostly didn’t work, USB printing was bragging rights. You had to buy modems with a hardware DAC, else it was done in the driver which worked only on Windows. GTK kinda just went from v1 to v2, everything looked 10 years outdated, and even Firefox had glitchy UI on Linux. If you could insert a CD and get it to show up without manually mounting, you were staring into the future.

        The Web was on hold, Microsoft having won the browsers wars pt. 1, and proceeding to stall with Internet Explorer 6, correctly predicting that browsers would compete with their hegemony in the client space. There were no services: GMail and Youtube were just getting started. You ran local programs, and there were barely any for Linux. The choice was between booting Windows and dicking with cracks from Astalavista, and booting Linux to rice your E16, then staring at it. General productivity software was almost non-existent — you had a dozen compilers and interpreters instead. Where I’m from, banking required desktop software which required windows, not to mention smart cards, which also required windows.

        This was made worse by the proprietary formats, which were the key to maintaining stranglehold. Everyone was emailing .docs around, which you could sometimes open with Abiword or maybe dump just the text and Antiword. Even the PDF viewers were a bit crap. Had to submit a report? You probably booted Windows in a virtual machine to use Office, and the CPU was yet to add instructions helping with that. Media was even worse; everything was MPEG and required royalties. LAME Ain’t an MP3 Encoder because it wasn’t allowed to be. RIAA/MPAA were fighting hard to keep you buying physical shit. Meanwhile, you could only play Tux Racer and Nethack.

        Around that time, Microsoft was about to introduce Palladium, an attestation chain rooted in hardware. Everyone was despairing about the same future: in 3-5 years, Microsoft would use it to pull in and segregate an increasing portion of the Internet, until the whole became their walled garden. Hope that sounds familiar.


        Meanwhile, older penguins just didn’t give a fuck. They simply didn’t use the shit they couldn’t use, and missed none of it. They worked to extend what they had, the digital commons.

        No one could stand TVs, so as an act of disobedience, we invented p2p piracy. Napster, DC, torrents — which are alive and kicking. Xiph gave no fucks and started working on free media codecs. Vorbis became CELT became OPUS. Tarkin became Daala became (merged into) AV1. Youtube is now serving OPUS and VP9 or AV1; our best codecs trace their lineage to DIY stuff done to avoid proprietary formats. H.266 can, and will, fuck off. PDF is everywhere. Jimbo started Wikipedia. Flash went away. The modern web happened. Linux grew up and I don’t even notice I’m using it. Free software ate nonfree in most domains; the gardens are now walled through access, not by being built on proprietary stacks. Massive progress happened.


        Now that the digital world runs on services — which were a clever ruse to subvert old free software (Google runs on Linux, remember?) — someone is threatening to close a few pipes. So what? Just look at the fucking size of those commons that we have created. Someone will claw back some of that… and? Worst case, we lose a few ways to waste our time, of which we have hundreds. Retract from the mainstream a little, again. Have some difficulties using a few services. Be careful which hardware we buy. Oh noez.

        Shit changes constantly. Companies battle relentlessly to undercut one another. We invent workarounds and grow our knowledge. Relax, get yourself LineageOS+MicroG or GrapheneOS or even a Fairphone; get a Framework; use Fediverse; get off those services and sail the high seas where needed; use Linux+Firefox if you aren’t already; touch grass; and if someone tries to force you into extracting rent — refuse it.

        Persist.

        • lenathaw@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Amazing writeup, thanks for the nostalgia trip. Albeit I’m a Linux user since 2008, I did grew up with the internet since the mid90s. Things come and go, but perseverance must stay forever.

        • hiire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Amazing post. As someone born in the 2000s, this is definitely an unknown story for me (I grew up with WinXP), and I didn’t get to live this virtual freedom revolution. I do remember that MS owned everything though, they were the big promise, the big company that made computers and the internet work. Microsoft was everywhere.

          Definitely an interesting story, I will definitely continue supporting open standards and free software, possibly even contributing once I get better at programming ;)

  • kostel_thecreed@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t google’s DRM be considered a monopoly? Not in the US, but don’t they have laws and regulations against this type of stuff?

  • Hank@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you reduce your consumption corporations can’t screw you over that much. Also it’s good for the environment.

    • Tocano@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      true. why should I need a facebook account? I only need to talk to the few dozen people I know, not to the millions or billions of mostly bot accounts.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Completely agree in substance and spirit, but not on this framing of everything as about ownership. Personally I don’t want to “own” data any more than I want to own a car. What I want is control, rights, privacy and personal freedom. The ownership obsession seems to me a red herring that just proves how much we’ve been taken in by consumer capitalism.

    Forgive the rant. I agree with you on the substance.

    • hobs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me too. I just want people (and the businesses they run) to deal with me honestly and fairly. If C-suite execs and investors were named and shamed over and over again, even for the little things, they might grow a heart and learn to build humane companies. Co-Ops give me hope. Free Geek in the Pacific Northwest. Independent book shops and restaurants. Qwant, MetaGer and Brave search and ublock origin and Mozilla and the fediverse give me some hope.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a phone company out of Europe, Fairphone, that’s striving to fix these problems. I can’t really say if their specs are up to par or not (fwiw their newest phone can do 5G), but you can repair you phone with their Spare Parts offerings, like the selfie camera, earpiece, rear cameras, speaker, USB-C port, display, back cover, battery, etc.

    Issue is that you can’t buy it in the US or elsewhere, but there are some tricks where you can get it into the US/CA by going with Clove or Reship.

    Phone looks to work best on T-Mobile networks, so AT&T or Verizon users might see terrible performance.

    So, not panacea, but a decent solution for those willing to go down that path.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      help the fact that you only put a one in the first paragraph is bothering me

      I’ve never heard of Clove or Reship before though, thanks!

      • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was just responding to the first point made by OP. Didn’t intend on commenting on the other stuff because either I agree or don’t know enough to contribute!

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries, my problem was that markdown indents the first paragraph after a list item declaration like 1. . My recommendation which you can definitely ignore is just ditch the number

  • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥everything is fine🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • Tocano@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I undertand this feeling. I have a group of friends which use Messenger as a main chat app and they refuse to stop using it for convenience, but most of the features they label as convenience are the exact thing that are wrong with it. Many other platforms, despite not being perfect, have the same/more features and are better implemented.

    Even if you transfer to a new and better platform, the big companies don’t let go easily. They buy those new platforms and change them or just nuke them. If they can’t, they will use ways to detect who is using alternative platforms and alienate them. It is just like the Phoebus cartel, which controlled progress to maximize profit. They are not against you or progress, they are against anything which reduces their potential monetary value.

    I disagree when you mention subscriptions as a bad thing. Subscriptions have existed since forever, and work well when you deal with a service, for example paying a subscription to a video creator you like, or maintenance costs of hardware you use.

    But not everything is grim. I have seen a lot of new FLOSS projects appearing everywhere, and people are becoming more aware of the many alternatives. I’ve even seen non programmers using ChatGPT (or equivalent) to create their own self-hosted platforms, showing that even those not techinal people are able to contribute to the general community.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t understand when everyone jumped on Facebook messenger instead of just using their phone’s built in text messaging and I still don’t. It’s like people crave spying or something…

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That at least explains your situation, it doesn’t explain the people around me in this country. Everyone rushed to download those apps, despite knowing that Facebook analyzes everything.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Phoebus Cartel is not the greatest example, since there’s a solid argument for energy efficiency. I also think most cases of software subscriptions are bad and far worse than e.g. Adobe’s CS days

  • hobs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s the #enshitification of everything. I listened to an interview with SAG-AFTRA by a new podcaster trying to survive and just when they start talking about the investors and products admitting to trying to build out till October when actors and writers start getting evicted… then some Amazon streaming services ad. And it happened again towards the end. And no warning or apology or mindfulness from the podcaster. So so depressing. The interview was great and happy to have heard it. Wish I could get access to information unpolluted by advertisement and capitalism. Thank goodness for the fediverse.

    • off_brand_@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not that it contradicts your comment, but it’s worth noting those ads could well have been inserted by the platform or the podcast publisher.

  • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    They consider revenue streams more important than one-off payment.

    So everything becomes service and we are left in this non-ownership economy where we own nothing.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously watch this video posted here: https://lemmy.world/post/2126185

    If Yann is correct about how AI will work in the VERY near future, google is already dead. It has no future Personal offline open source assistant AI is near at hand. This will kill the entire digital ecosystem as it stands now. If you understand this, contextually, all the BS right now is from desperate venture capitalists trying to get as much return on investment as possible.

    Get a machine with at least 16GB of VRAM on a GPU and start leaning to mess with FOSS AI. This is the next digital age.

    Privacy is something we control. You don’t actually NEED the conveniences. You vote with your wallet. As far as devices, I love Graphene, but I also live without anything that only comes from the proprietary google framework like the Play store. I only use open source Android apps. The Play store is not Android, it is proprietary google garbage.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t blame technology; blame capitalism. Technology could equally well be used to benefit everyone, but doing that doesn’t vastly increase the personal wealth of the already wealthy.

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is exactly it. Free Open Source Software aims to benefit everyone, but the downside is that it has mostly benefited private corporations who leech off of the free labor of the FOSS community. Capitalism ruins fucking everything.

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, of course. The end result of capitalism is necessarily feudalism - capitalism doesn’t make universally efficient markets. It makes markets that are efficient for the winners. I should have said technology companies and not technology as a whole

  • xiao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Strangely your post makes me think of the SciFi book written by Alain Damasio - Les Furtifs. 😬

    Not sure that it has been translated in English…