supernova.place
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

Heart attack kills China ‘century baby’ born at midnight on January 1, 2000 at 25

www.scmp.com

external-link
message-square
33
fedilink
185
external-link

Heart attack kills China ‘century baby’ born at midnight on January 1, 2000 at 25

www.scmp.com

fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago
message-square
33
fedilink
Heartbroken mother says her ‘world has fallen apart’ as she calls for formal investigation into ‘serious medical accident’ without elaborating.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    All this pedantism about century start dates, and everyone missed they could have called her a millennium baby but went for century instead.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Plot twist: The year 2000 Chinese New Year was actually on February 5th, a year of the dragon.

    https://www.pinyin.info/chinese_new_year/cny2000-2099.html

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Plot twist: Centuries end in “0”, they don’t start in “0”.

      The 21st Century started 1/1/2001.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mathematics and languages have different rules.

        In languages it is possible for one century to be a yewa shorter than all the others. Other centuries begin on a year divisible by hundred, but centuries 1–99 and -1–-99 don’t. They are both missing a year, and outside mathematics that’s just fine.

        If almost all native speakers of a language say that a century begins in a year divisible by hundred then that’s how it goes in that language.

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fuck sake, I thought we’d left this argument back in 99.

        • blakenong@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          We’re still gonna party.

      • usrtrv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Correct.

        The 1st century started at 1 A.D. and included 100. 2nd century started 101 to 200. Etc etc. If you change the 21st century to be 2000. You would to shift everything down. Eventually making the 1st century 99 years. Or creating a year 0 or using 1BC.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is why the years in the “20th Century” started with “19”. 20 is the end, not the start.

          • faultywalnut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I thought it was the 20th century because if you count centuries starting at 1-99 CE, 1900-1999 is the twentieth one

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              One to 99 is not a century. :)

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t feel like this is correct.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Haha, touché salesman 👍

      • don@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Seinfeld explains this to Newman.

  • Encephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So actually a quarter-century baby.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wtf a deadly heart attack at age 25??

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 month ago

        We can go at any time.

        • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Delay nothing

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure he is missing out on much… Another 50 years of working to stay alive…

        Maybe he moved on to a better place.

  • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    One year too early for the title? The 21st century started on 2001.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      How so? The first century surely started with year 0, the first year. Just like a person is zero years old during its first year. And years 0-99 make up the first century. Then the second century starts at 100-199, and so on. 🤷‍♂️

      • falseprophet@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        there is no year 0 we started at 1.

        • figjam@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Babies don’t start at 1.

          • falseprophet@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken but it irrelevant to when the millennium starts anyway

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken

              Huh, that’s really interesting ☺️ kinda cute ngl

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            You should have told that to those guys 2025 years ago.

        • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          There is no year 1 in our current calendar system either. The Gregorian Calendar begins in 1582. The Julian Calendar includes year 1, but changed in year 8, so 0001-01-01 is a slightly different day in the Gregorian Calendar, the Julian Calendar, and the old Julian Calendar. 2000 years after Julian Calendar 0001-01-01 is late December 2000.

          This has less meaning in China because China used its own calendar until 1911. People living in China 2000 years before 2001-01-01 would not have called it year 1.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Who is “we”?

          • falseprophet@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            mankind

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Looked it up now, you’re correct.

              Although there are instances of year zero, like with astronomical years.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s complicated.

      There’s a “strict” way and then there’s a “common perception and practice” way. You’re thinking of the strict way.

      But yeah, sure. I guess it’s due to the fact that we don’t have a year zero, really, which is counterintuitive for us in the modern era, I suppose. At least for me.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not a good sign

  • LordBelphegor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    how is this news?

  • Pudutr0ñ@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kthxbai

World News@lemmy.world

world@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !world@lemmy.world

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

  • How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

  • Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.62K users / day
  • 7.86K users / week
  • 13.9K users / month
  • 29.8K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 46.4K subscribers
  • 17.1K Posts
  • 278K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Calvinball Champ@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org