Intel Corp. is poised to announce plans this week to cut more than 20% of its staff, aiming to eliminate bureaucracy at the struggling chipmaker, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    AMD did that, but Global Foundry doesn’t do that well, at least compared to TSMC. Also Intel was going strong with their fabs until AMD started building better chips architecture wise. I’m just saying that splitting might not work.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The Global Foundries split was probably a way to get AMD out of the hyper-capital-intensive fab business. And without a tier-1 customer, Global had less reason to pursue smaller nodes.

      Intel has that national-champion thing to keep it afloat. I can imagine there are defence contracts that will never go to a “TSMC Arizona Division” and they’ll pay whatever it takes to keep that going.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah for a long time there Intel was way ahead of the fabless AMD. Back then people were saying it was a mistake for AMD to split the fab business.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It still could be a mistake in the long term, though. Imagine the wise US administration slapping 1,220,332% tariffs on Taiwan? Or China wreaking havoc there. I still think Intel could fare well with better leadership handling their fabs.