• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, debates don’t really center on the issue of sterilizing the whole planet (fyi there are deep-rock bacteria everywhere so “just” molten surface isn’t enough), but rather on the loss we are causing.

      Ie ending species that without us would have no issue evolving & continuing to be part of the ecosystems.

      Also from bacterial life to complex fauna its easily a billion years (+/- a lot).

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No. If cats dont have anything to eat bcs their food is also extinct then they absolutely cannot just continue fine without us.

          Same with plants, all of them require eg water of certain qualities etc.

          We are changing habitats (and killing species trough that), not killing specific species directly (eg hunting, pesticides, etc) and via the lack of them changing the habitats.

          And by changing the habitats I mean at speeds far beyond what evolution can keep up with, so it comes to more of a reset. So the sadness of this wiki/Biodiversity_loss followed by booms like wiki/Cambrian_explosion, but ofc note the timescales.