Karma is a removed!

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Biweekly is fortnightly. Every two weeks. I.e. Every other Thursday.

      Semi-monthly would be twice a month, i.e. the 1st and the 15th.

      26 biweekly paychecks in a year…24 semimonthly paychecks in a year.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      JasonDJ did a good job at explaining the what, the why would be down to cost-cutting. There are fixed costs associated with putting out payroll (beyond man hours required, there are processing fees etc.); so opting for 2/month instead of fortnightly saves you ~10% in fixed costs.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          In general, because the transition puts too much of a financial strain on hourly/wage staff - they tend to live paycheque to paycheque and would struggle to be able to wait an additional 2-3 weeks for their pay to come through.

          Besides risking possible staff revolt, it would also make hiring staff much more difficult if new employees learned during induction they might have to wait 5 weeks to be paid!

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                paying out once a month. even when i worked an hourly job at a restaurant we got paid monthly.

                • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I guess it depends on what is seen as the norm in a particular country. In Australia, it’s most common for hourly wages to be paid either weekly or fortnightly - and I believe it’s a similar case in North America also.

                  Given they only the companies stand to benefit from paying employees less frequently, it makes it harder for those companies to compete for quality labour (without then offering a higher hourly rate, negating any benefit for them to do so).

                  • lime!@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    it also benefits the workers though. that’s why unions push for it.