I have been banned from unpopularopinion for exposing person defending genocide and use of human shields by IDF.

One of the users in unpopularopinion thread was complaining about someone calling him a “fascist”

https://feddit.uk/comment/17531487

In response I did paste a screenshot of his comment claiming IDF are not using human shields, it is Hamas who do that:

https://feddit.uk/comment/17529782

… And the mod of unpopularopinion banned me. I can only guess he is a another genocide apologist.

  • Admiral Patrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    … And the mod of unpopularopinion banned me. I can only guess he is a another genocide apologist.

    Yes, that’s the only reason you got banned. You got me.

    It’s not the purity tests, taking things out of context, hostility, or trollish behavior.

    It’s not the condescending comments.

    It’s not the smear campaign you’re STILL going on about while taking things out of context to “prove” your point.

    It’s not the fact that you intentionally re-posted a removed comment that violated the rules.

    It’s not the fact that I explicitly said that this is a no-politics community and was only allowing the post to remain up because it was about political discussions in general. And you decided to bring explicit politics into it.

    It’s not the fact that your have a LONG history of bad-faith behavior and derailing conversations with your shtick.

    No. It can’t possibly be any of that. It must be because I’m a genocide apologist, bootlicking Nazi. That’s clearly the only rational conclusion to be drawn here.

    You fucking caught me.

    /s

    YDI

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Why did you remove my comment hen?

      As somebody else pointed in this thread, you nuked my comment that put Opinionhaver@feddit.uk comment in context

      If somebody makes a claim, why I am getting censored for responding within the context of that claim?

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No wonder why you’re a mod of !@news@lemmy.world, you find words more important than actions. Israel’s mass murder is bad, but calling it out is worse!

      Way to keep the stereotypes of lemmy.world’s mods true.

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      If some basic insults is worse than people justifying a 57 years occupation you should revaluate your moral compass

    • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It’s not the purity tests, taking things out of context, hostility, or trollish behavior.

      Stop lying. I did paste screenshot of his disgusting defence of IDF using human shields and told them they were “genocide apologist”.

      You removed this comment and banned me.

      It’s not the smear campaign you’re STILL going on about while taking things out of context to “prove” your point.

      Calling someone defending use of human shields a “genocide apologist” is a smear now?!

      It’s not the fact that I explicitly said that this is a no-politics community and was only allowing the post to remain up because it was about political discussions in general. And you decided to bring explicit politics into it

      What political discussion did I bring?

      It’s not the fact that your have a [LONG historyof bad-faith behavior and derailing conversations with your shtick.

      Your point is?

      No. It can’t possibly be any of that. It must be because I’m a genocide apologist

      Since you are STILL claiming that I somehow smeared the guy defending use of human shields than yes - you must be one of them. It is either this or you are as bright as a broken bulb. Which one is it?

      • Admiral Patrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Your point is?

        You’ve pretty much just made it for me. Thanks. I’m not going to engage in your gish-gallop.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          You not banning or at least removing the comments of the genocide apologist shows your bias.

          If you were really concerned with leaving that post to only a general context of politics and nothing specific, then you’d ban or removal anyone or any comments the refer to any specific political events, contemporary or otherwise. That includes those for and against said event.

          You only banned/removed users/comments against one specific contemporary political event/state of affairs - not the ones for it or at least appearing as defending it - and so OP is calling you out for that.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          You doubling down now?

          Do a decent thing, recognise you made a mistake, apologise and reverse your decision. And remove comments of the genocide apologist playing victim while you are on it, since you removed mine exposing him.