• Schneemensch@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to the article fabrication seems to have a very low yield. That will generally make it difficult for consumer products.

    I would generally assume first use would be in locations were super conductors are already used today. E. g. in MRI machines which would then not require cooling anymore and therefore could be more compact, quieter and consuming much less energy.

    Other prime fields for super conductors are energy transportation from the energy producers to the consumers.

    Application in electronics seems difficult for me as the material is not used stand alone there and therefore new fabrication processes and designs will be needed. After all it will not work to use this material to replace silicon transistors as our transistor designs are relying on the semiconductor nature of silicone and a superconductor cannot follow this by definition. Maybe the connections between transistors can be replaced, but I am not sure where most of the heat generation happens. If I remember my physics studies correctly there is also significant energy loss within the transistor and that would still mean that the cpu would heat up. This would be now especially critical as the temperature must not exceed the temperature where the material loses super conductivity as this would most likely lead to a fast melt down of the device.

    • recycledbits@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Assuming it’s real, the material takes about as much current as a wet noodle. So no giant magnets for you. Maybe some low-current application like sensors? (SQUID etc.)