• TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, I used to think this way until I actually tried GNOME for a bit. I’ve grown quite fond of its workflow. There’s definitely extensions that I feel I need for it to be fully usable from my perspective, but in some ways I see it as a positive to start out with a good foundation and then allow users to extend the functionality they feel they need onto that base. Not every user is going to want the same thing, so keeping the core minimalist makes sense.

    If I wanted something like Windows, I’d use KDE. If I really wanted a GNOME Windows-like experience similar to the old GNOME2 behavior I’d use something like MATE or Cinnamon. I guess my point is that there’s plenty of DEs out there that are essentially copies of the same workflow. I respect the desire to innovate in GNOME3.

    • Qvest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing everyone who likes GNOME (me included) only uses it because of its unique workflow. And that’s exactly why people were hesitant by GNOME 3 (besides the UI. I’m not a linux user from that time but damn the UI was weird seeing some old screenshots)

      • SpongeBorgCubePants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        @MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

        is it that unique?

        For me it just strikes a nice balance between a full tiler and a classic desktop UI.

        And in my book, you don’t even need any extensions, the core product is fine as it is.