• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I need to know what your question means to answer it. What money are we talking about?

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not Meta, so I can’t give you a detailed breakdown of how they use the data they collect to make money.

        But you are talking about what sort of money, something they’d get from not using E2EE?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I guess it depends how much. If they’ll net like a billion from not doing E2EE then yeah absolutely. If it’s significantly less they’d might still go with E2EE for the PR and not having to comply with shit. It’s not like they’d lose all the metadata anyway.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You are way off. For reference, here’s what you asked

                Do you believe that Meta, if given the opportunity, would choose personal privacy over making money?

                And my answer

                I guess it depends how much. If they’ll net like a billion from not doing E2EE then yeah absolutely. If it’s significantly less they’d might still go with E2EE for the PR and not having to comply with shit. It’s not like they’d lose all the metadata anyway.