I disagreed with a post Stamets made on their comm, and voiced an opposing opinion. I was never uncivil, but can’t see my comments to share, as they’ve all been deleted.

So, apparently having an opinion other than the one allowed is a banable offense. How very Trek.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    he seems to be having a tantrum all over that thread. PTB*.

    *edit: after stamets showed the removed comments, I think you did deserve it, but he is also being the same level of uncivil.

    both of you have the same energy, you could be besties, honestly.

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        the two of you are so similar that I’m quite certain that first interaction does not matter.

        if I’m wrong, I’d like to be corrected. but I have a gut feeling I’m not.

        • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          My original comment, that kicked off the whole “civility debate:”

          Coming from someone that can either take or leave star trek, the new stuff is bad, and ignoring that because it’s wearing a trek skin is the cope.

          Sorry.

          If you think that’s a violation, well, i dunno what to say.