cm0002@mander.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 20 days agoWho said free markets can't deliver for the consumerlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1235arrow-down15
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageWho said free markets can't deliver for the consumerlemmy.mlcm0002@mander.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 20 days agomessage-square30linkfedilink
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·20 days agoSo a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.
minus-squareslevinkelevra@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·19 days agoNot one random sample but the average of all samples.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoThe random sample collectively.
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days agoPresumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it’d be 94/6
minus-squareRicaz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 days agoSpecifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%. It’s impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that’s the purity they export.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days agoThat makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.
minus-squareARGVMI~1.PIF@mastodon.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·19 days ago@SCmSTR That’s 40% more coke per coke! @Tar_alcaran
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 days agoWhat… Is your instance name
So a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.
Not one random sample but the average of all samples.
The random sample collectively.
Presumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it’d be 94/6
Specifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%.
It’s impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that’s the purity they export.
That makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.
My coke has more coke!
@SCmSTR
That’s 40% more coke per coke!
@Tar_alcaran
What… Is your instance name