• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t want this kind of connectivity between my phone and PC courtesy of MS.

      I already have it via VPN and just use either RDP or (like you) SSH. It’s easy to send a “shutdown -r -f -t 0”

      Hell, I have shortcuts on my phone to reboot my personal machines - laptops, VM’s, even my ESXi host.

      MS over here acting like we haven’t been able to do this for years with off-the-shelf tools.

      Also, who shuts down boxes these days? That’s what power management is for. If you left it on, I assume you wanted it on.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a customer drop off their PC for service and they had the “all-in” setup- everything in Windows signed in, opted in to everything imaginable, including the phone link app.

    While I worked on their PC I got copies of every phone notification, as well as the ability to act on those notifications. I saw every SMS his wife sent him. Everything. Just pop-up notifications in my face. Very nearly hit the “activate alarm” button for their home security system multiple times.

    If you use this, you are the absolute bottom of the barrel- the dumbest buffoon to have ever existed. If you use Window’s “phone link” app, you should be absolutely ashamed of yourself.

    • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s like saying the customer gave me the password to their PC or phone, and then I had access to all their files and photos.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s not though. It’s worse than that- much worse. It’s “Then I had access to the user documents, files, settings, SMS and text history. Wanna know if they prefer blondes or brunettes?” because that’s exactly what it was.

        • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          The tech is supposed to be the expert. He/her should be guiding the customer so they don’t expose themselves. This is not a 'dumb customer ’ story. It’s a ‘incompetent tech’ story for not asking the right questions or providing the right guidance. Former tech guy.

          • Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I disagree. Anyone willing to hand control of their entire life to an app, sacrifice telemetry 24/7 is an idiot regardless of education. Trying to fix people like this is a losing game.

            • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              When you give your device over to a tech support department, it is on them to tell the customer of potential security issues with the customers data. To me, it’s no different then accessing a customer’s glove box when you are servicing their car. If it doesn’t pertain to the work order, it’s none of your business.