Is that GPT-3.5 (ie the free version) or GPT-4? I tried with the former today and the screenshot of this thread is from that try. I just tried again right now with GPT-3.5 and it still yields the same answer:
I asked if Kenya was in Africa after and it apologized for the mistake. I then asked the original question and it corrected itself to the wrong answer again.
Yeah I think these screenshots probably exclude all the fuckery they pump into ChatGPT before getting the wrong answer. Pretending ChatGPT isn’t the biggest development in the history of commerce isn’t going to change the impact it has, it’s just going to leave people surprised and unprepared when it changes everything.
I think these screenshots probably exclude all the fuckery
Before you make that accusation go and ask it that question, it’s not hard, there’s no hidden “fuckery”. You must live a sad life if you feel obligated to get emotional and make silly accusations just because an internet stranger made fun of ChatGPT.
Pretending ChatGPT isn’t the biggest development in the history of commerce
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. Is it neat? Yes. Is it a useful tool? Yes (when they haven’t put a million restrictions and performance limitations on it).
Is it the biggest development in the history of commerce? Almost certainly not. LLMs are a highly-sophisticated game of mad libs, they work even better than many would expect (as Google learned when they bet against them) but they are not general AI or world-changing. It’ll have to be combined with a lot of other tech before it reaches the level we can say “biggest development in the history of commerce”
I tried this, and it gave a decent response in my case.
https://chat.openai.com/share/dbae5fb3-e8d4-4489-b1e0-42ae8601b33a
Is that GPT-3.5 (ie the free version) or GPT-4? I tried with the former today and the screenshot of this thread is from that try. I just tried again right now with GPT-3.5 and it still yields the same answer:
Gpt-4. I find that it’s substantially more reliable.
Yeah, and substantially more expensive.
It gets worse…
Okay, that got a snort from me.
I asked if Kenya was in Africa after and it apologized for the mistake. I then asked the original question and it corrected itself to the wrong answer again.
Ahh Kiribati. A member of the Caribbean, African and Pacific states. What a group!
Might as well put the kingdom of the Netherlands in there.
Yeah I think these screenshots probably exclude all the fuckery they pump into ChatGPT before getting the wrong answer. Pretending ChatGPT isn’t the biggest development in the history of commerce isn’t going to change the impact it has, it’s just going to leave people surprised and unprepared when it changes everything.
Before you make that accusation go and ask it that question, it’s not hard, there’s no hidden “fuckery”. You must live a sad life if you feel obligated to get emotional and make silly accusations just because an internet stranger made fun of ChatGPT.
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. Is it neat? Yes. Is it a useful tool? Yes (when they haven’t put a million restrictions and performance limitations on it).
Is it the biggest development in the history of commerce? Almost certainly not. LLMs are a highly-sophisticated game of mad libs, they work even better than many would expect (as Google learned when they bet against them) but they are not general AI or world-changing. It’ll have to be combined with a lot of other tech before it reaches the level we can say “biggest development in the history of commerce”
To date the best use i have seen for LLMs is the summary function in duckduckgo, it makes sense and cites its sources quite well even