When you’re talking to an open source dev, just remember that they are literally giving you their time for free, and they are people who don’t like to be treated poorly.

Edit: Just to be clear, I don’t mean any ill will toward the guy. He’s frustrated and he’s just taking it out in the wrong venue at the wrong people, but that doesn’t mean he’s a bad person.

Edit 2: The reinstalling he’s talking about is NPM. So just running npm install. It’s because he tried removing the node_modules directory, which is a reasonable thing to do, but it means you need to reinstall the modules with that command.

  • mastefetri@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends on if the first guy is complaining about having to reinstall this specific software, or if the software borked his entire system to the point that he has to reinstall his entire OS. Because that happened to me once. But in the first scenario he is being a dick, and in the second one not so much.

    • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this case, in trying to resolve the issue, he deleted his node_modules directory. So he’s talking about having to reinstall everything by typing npm install and waiting for it to finish.

      • FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        oh man…

        People can be such dicks, you have my sympathy.

        I’ve been thinking about open sourcing a Node project of mine recently… concerning that this is the kind of thing to expect

        • hperrin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, this isn’t usual. This is actually really rare. Almost all of the interactions I have with users of my libraries are great. People are generally appreciative and kind, or at least not rude. This is an outlier, and I try not to let these things sour my experience.

          He’s frustrated and he’s being abrasive because of that, but that doesn’t make him a bad person. I try to respond without being rude back, but just stern. Usually when you do that, people will either not respond again or apologize. I’ve never had a user keep being rude, and if I did, I would just ban them.

          Sometimes people just kinda forget that on the internet they’re still talking to other real people, you know?

          • boeman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re lucky. I left FOSS dev because I got tired of my free time being abused by people like the one in your post

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve had to adopt a two strikes policy towards these aggressive trolls, who treat you like your their personal servant, especially since they make up like <1% of ppl on issue trackers. After a warning, if they don’t play nice, then they’re out.

              It’s the only way to keep the coding experience enjoyable, and not suffer from burnout.

    • appel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree, in neither scenario the open source dev owes him anything. You get to use and modify the software for free, but the flip side is you are entitled to nothing.

      • RovingFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You are entitled to the truth. If the dev knows their software could have very damaging effects then that should be front and center on the software page.

        • appel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Usually it is? But ultimately it’s still your own responsibility. You did not pay the dev, the dev does not ask you to pay them, ergo the dev owes you diddly squad.

          • RovingFox@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Let’s be decent with each other, I don’t think my expectations are outrageous. I consider decent to make sure that the person that will use your software is aware of the dangers. And the best person to know those dangers is usually the dev.

        • daed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, no. It’s your job to vet the software you run. If it’s open source, you had every chance to make sure it wasn’t going to irreversibly break your system ahead of time.

          Alternatively, you could pay money for a solution from a reputable company with support.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re implying that to even install the simplest of programs, I’d need to read and understannd many thousands of lines of code, starting with the FOSS project itself and then spidering out to every dependency. This speaks nothing of the fact that it may be written in multiple languages, some of which I am not familiar with, and even if I am, code can be written in ways that’s almost impossible to understand. This might take a week for a 200 line project.

            Reminds me of when my employer said they were going to stop using open source software until a team had vetted it completely. Lol, once they talked to engineers that idea died immediately.

            • carly™@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              This. I swear, some people in the FOSS community seem to be convinced everyone who uses a computer is a developer.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Right? And it seems like no one is interested in understanding my point, most only seem interested in defending developers of FOSS. I understand there is no legal obligation from FOSS devs… That is irrelevant.

                I love FOSS. It’s one of the best products of humanity. I am not attacking devs at all…

                My point was only that while devs don’t owe anyone anything legally, if the rare edge case happens where their code is destructive by accident, it would be a dick move to ignore complaints about it. I guess because it didn’t spell it all out like this, I “deserved” all the downvotes (on since-deleted comments) and condescending remarks?

                Yes I know that if I use Firefox I can’t sue them if somehow they wipe my OS. Yes I know that would probably never happen, it’s extremely unlikely to happen. But if it did, FF owes us at least a response. And I means owes in the sense that it’s the right thing to do, not “if you don’t do it I can sue you”.

            • CallumWells@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s absolutely a ridiculous stance. Yes, you can personally go through everything, but there’s also searching around to find out what other people say about it, actually look through the issues people have raised. Some of it applies to proprietary software as well, find out what other people say about the software. You don’t need to do everything yourself, but you do have to take responsibility for trying to make sure it will work as you hope it will.

            • daed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can see how you got there, but I’m actually not saying you need to understand any programming languages at all. If the code is out there, and the product is worthwhile, the community can and will vet it.

              Like I responded to the other guy, you put a level of trust in anything you use. You can pay for a product and expect polish and support, or you can go the open source route, the DIY hobbyist route, and expect to have to do more yourself. You might have to do research on a product before you trust it. This isn’t a radical concept to me. If I was putting together an RC car, I would do research on the motor to make sure it was unlikely to fail catastrophically.

            • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who put the gun to your head and made you run the software though?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                The response to this here is absolutely wild. I guess I should expect my machine to get wiped any moment

                • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Whenever you choose to run a program that has full access to parts of your PC that may cause issues, you are the person who chose to do so.

                  Just run apps in a sandbox if you don’t want to risk having to reinstall your OS in a worst case scenario.

                  The developer owes you nothing.

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    12
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Legal obligations that I grasped at age 9 don’t really interest me to talk about. It’s pretty obvious I understand them. What I was trying to talk about was what reasonable people should do. But apparently that’s offensive to many ITT as most responses are condescending af

          • Luke@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Alternatively, you could pay money for a solution from a reputable company with support.

            and run the possibly even greater risk that it’ll fuck something up, since you probably can’t even look at their source

            • daed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              ??? You quoted my comment with ‘reputable’ in it. You put a level of trust in anything you use. Reputable companies are unlikely to fuck your shit up with bad software. It happens - not trying to say it doesn’t - but again, you have to trust somewhere.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              By this definition of entitled, I’m not entitled to be alive once I walk outside, because I should have known the risk ahead of time.

              Lol what the fuck?

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The software is almost certainly provided as is, with risks assumed by the person installing it.

          Still, I doubt any dev wants a catastrophic outcome and takes steps to avoid that or warn the end user if the code is more likely to bork something.

          I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect the dev to do their best but it’s also not like you can sue them and win, most likely.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t say I’ve spoken directly to a dev in a situation like that, thankfully, but if that opinion were dominant, FOSS wouldn’t be a thing. Destroying your data or OS is kind of a no-no, whether you pay for the software or not. Obviously, you can’t sue the FOSS dev, but come on, it’d be amazingly shitty if they didn’t even try to help if there’s any evidence it’s their fault.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. It’s provided without warranty nor guarantee that it’ll work or even leave your system intact. That’s the core of most opensource licenses. Dev owes nobody nothing.

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0