So what?

Yes, but it would break many pages and it wouldn’t protect you from many attacks.

It’s like wearing a gas mask: you can still be hit by a car or bitten by a dog, it ruins your walk in the park, but it makes you immune to some toxins.

I believe in solutions to reduce the damage of drugs, and illegal porn sounds to me very similar.

I don’t think that a pedo would spontaneously go to a doctor to be helped. He would remain hidden until discovered. I also don’t think that all of them go beyond videos. In this sense a channel that keeps them away from the actual exploitation, like AI-generated content, may save some kids from becoming victims.

It’s a very controversial topic though, and surely there won’t be a public debate anytime soon.

Necessary disclaimer: I’m 100% against that shit.

Hear this: what about AI-generated illegal videos as a sort of methadone for perverts? There’s a whole debate right now and it’s not trivial stuff.

Quite frankly, I’m more concerned of the profile they would be able to build with all my interests (because ID will be extended to everything), and by the fact that small independent websites (or even Wikipedia!) may be banned.

But yeah, data leaks are concerning too.

They do it right, it’s just that the goal is not to protect the kids but identify the adults.

I’m more worried by idiots accessing internet because clearly it isn’t a tool for everyone. Instead of an ID, there should be a captcha to measure the users intelligence and culture to keep out the fools without reasoning capabilities.

Kids always found ways to satisfy their curiosity when nature brings them there, even before internet. These laws are 100% attempts to impose control and surveillance with the excuse of “protecting the innocents”.

By the way: in my scale of things that kids shouldn’t see, porn comes after violence, misinformation, political extremism (both sides), racism, homophobia, and religion. I find absurd that none of them is even on the table… maybe because the pro-id people tend to be fascists with racist and homophobic views and an head full of BS and fear for God.

It takes a bit of practice to get predictable results (which is ironic since every single word is a prediction)

Indeed “Computer Science” is ridiculous. It makes the other points redundant.

Custom made with Ollama.

Ours is LLM based. It makes mistakes, but nothing terrible.

As a first low-bar filter to eliminate candidates that are less likely to succeed.

It’s pretty normal to look for someone with a personality in line with the team to avoid personal conflicts (eg “no jerks rule”). Some places also avoid people with a spine fearing a conflict with the management.

I see it as a compliment when it happens to me.

Make it socially unacceptable to adopt and maintain some behaviours.

It will take generations, but it’s the only way to have the political support to reject certain things.

I’ve been doing interviews for lots of years and in several companies. I give feedback to the hiring manager who is supposed to sugarcoat it a bit and forward it, but most of times there’s not much to say beyond “that’s not the right guy”.

I rejected good candidates just because I knew that the final interview would reject them anyway for some secondary aspect that happens to be valued a lot by a manager. I also rejected good candidates because I was convinced they would not like the job and leave in a year.

It’s not always a matter of skills and it’s not always something you can put in a formal reply.

HR departments also don’t use AI.

Mine does.

I’ll test it with the filter I implemented, but you would be rejected by a human anyway if your CV isn’t good enough + people like me always check for tricks in the CVs and reject based on that alone.

Basically: bad idea.

Without wealth or the possibility to enter into a business that can better deal with inflation, I don’t see many options.

Small investments may be done with as little as €100, but you can do much with small amounts even if you nail something amazing.

You may move abroad maybe.

There are funds indexed on inflation, and national bonds tend to follow the inflation, but if you go into double digits there’s nothing safe or easy. You can also invest abroad or in a different currency playing on the exchange rate.

However, if you need to ask here, you’d better stick to something simpler.

Make debts as long as they have a fixed interest rate. Invest in something linked to inflation.

Ideally, have a primary source of income that lets you follow the inflation (eg own a shop where you can increase prices).