

This affects the view of posts via the bluesky servers, but not via mirrors or other servers
And the use of content addressing means you can be sure it hasn’t been modified
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
Natanael@infosec.pub
Natanael@lemmy.zip
@Natanael_L@mastodon.social
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
This affects the view of posts via the bluesky servers, but not via mirrors or other servers
And the use of content addressing means you can be sure it hasn’t been modified
Several Android manufacturers have their own settings in the OS for battery longevity (automatic schedule based smart charging, or charging limits)
Don’t think it’s native in Android. Charging limits need support in the charging controller chip, plus driver support in the OS.
I use my backup headphones when my Bluetooth headset has run out of battery
Or make a rule that bosses have to try out everything they suggest for others first, let them Darwin award themselves instead of others
Wireguard is most reliable in terms of security. For censorship resistance, it’s all about tunneling it in a way that looks indistinguishable from normal traffic
Domain or IP doesn’t make much of a difference. If somebody can block one they can block the other. The trick is not getting flagged. Domain does make it easier to administer though with stuff like dyndns, but then you also need to make sure eSNI is available (especially if it’s on hosting) and that you’re using encrypted DNS lookups
Telegram has been under fire from the start, lol. 'we have math PhDs" 🤷
There’s also a big difference between published specifications and threat models for the encryption which professionals can investigate in the code delivered to users, versus no published security information at all with pure reverse engineering as the only option
Apple at least has public specifications. Experts can dig into it and compare against the specs, which is far easier than digging into that kind of code blindly. The spec describes what it does when and why, so you don’t have to figure that out through reverse engineering, instead you can focus on looking for discrepancies
Proper open source with deterministic builds would be even better, but we aren’t getting that out of Apple. Specs is the next best thing.
BTW, plugging our cryptography community: !crypto@infosec.pub
Looks like the same dev from reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/1iumxl3/how_far_can_i_push_closesource_code_towards_being/
It’s sliced along the center, rotating the axis of slice 360 degrees as it goes along the circle, cutting it in two halves which interlock
Ah yes, the classical “only their actions matters” response that all racists use
Don’t worry, they’re still abusing minorities in their own territory
… But not for Uyghurs
Nuremberg trials. Start talking about it. It will need to happen.
He wanted to be a war lord but all he’s got is a dull edge
The firing is illegal so they don’t have authority to do that
Yup, don’t be sole owner if you can’t afford a lawyer to make sure you get a good deal
And you can have a union even in a co-op (would mostly help if the majority / appointed leaders make decisions that break some rules, think enforcing safety rules and such)
You could also Steve Jobs yourself with a treatable but deadly disease
Your workaround is precisely why I said “more practical”. Any updates to your tooling might break it because it’s not an expected usecase
Malicious compliance is when you follow a order or law knowing that it will backfire on those who issued it.
“Lawfare” is a comparable term but not quite it (basically legal harassment campaigns).