Bluesky does have federation, it’s just limited for now. You can host your own accounts on your own hardware.
Cryptography nerd
Bluesky does have federation, it’s just limited for now. You can host your own accounts on your own hardware.
It pretends to be privacy focused, but because everything but 1-to-1 secret chats (where you have compared session identifiers) are accessible to the company and they keep logs of all group chats which they can access (even if they claim they can’t, that’s bullshit)
And he won only via the electoral college, while still losing the popular vote against her
So by default your instance respect mod removals.
You can change that as a server admin, so comments would remain visible to other users on your instance.
I think your instance is authoritative for content of comments, but the community hosting instance is authoritative for which comments are approved (other instances respect such removals by default)
Some dumb shit I see is setting SPF so Google is a trusted origin for email “to solve issues with sending to Gmail addresses” when what you’re supposed to do is add your mail servers as trusted origin.
Directionality, how does it work?
And if SCOTUS decides to make an unconstitutional ruling to overturn a result with a big safe margin, the dems have to be prepared for prosecuting for treason. After the Gore v Bush decision and the current everything, it’s perfectly plausible.
Somebody should consider building a fork that works of bluesky’s content addressing scheme, that way communities can effectively be re-homed in full even if the server dies
Lemmy stores your posts and replies on both your host server and on the server of the community.
One interesting behavior to note here that is different from reddit is that while comments on reddit belong to the profile of the person commenting and is then imported to view in the subreddit (this is why you can edit comments after being banned, and why there visible in your profile even if removed from a subreddit), on lemmy the target community is instead authoritative and your host server will by default respect a deletion by community mods on different servers by also removing that comment from your profile.
If “reject all” doesn’t close it, press summary, scroll down to “save selection”
It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network
They’re not for long term storage, they’re for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras
There are pills these days that are very good at breaking down lactose for you if you take them before eating
Clustering algorithms plus a focus on keeping your attention (watch time), not on quality
The topic and creator based clustering of multiple interests will pollute that anyway, because they don’t care about precision and just care about keeping your attention
I have watch history turned off precisely to avoid getting personal recommendations because they have always sucked for me
And the current right wing government is looking closely at US republicans in particular
Some states have laws to force a correct EC vote according to the popular vote. Not all do
I’m not taking the fall!
See also https://slrpnk.net/comment/10312933
What you’re suggesting can’t work
I sympathize with some of it, but you’re going too far
Content addressable posts like what Bluesky’s atproto does and cryptographic identity allows for portable posts and identities, and it even allows forkable communities as you can import and move entire conversations, and even mirror conversations that one team of mods may not like into another community (I made my first blog post about content addressable forums literally a whole decade ago)
And when posting to any /c/books the default visibility should be the same assuming a neutral reputation server and a neutral reputation user.
Literally impossible according to the CAP theorem (database terminology) in a decentralized network where not all servers federate with all (often because they just never have interacted and thus don’t know of each other)
You have to push the communities to participate in multiple parallel communities, that’s much more reliable. Together with a credible threat that the community can depose bad mod teams by forking, you have a much better chance of preventing bad mod behavior
No, this will only lead people without access to Google Play to be forced to get it from somebody who has modified the app to fake the check.