I wanted to break the video game logic people were using. People write things like “This piece of paper says anyone can compete. Therefore the men’s group is really the Open group.”

People literally argue as if we live in a video game. They think they because they can Google what a law says, that the simulation automatically implements said law.

Nothing in the rules of chess say that men ought to harass women. Therefore, that fact is hidden from many people. A piece of paper doesn’t say it, so it’s invisible.

If someone lived in reality and they knew that men consistently harass women and that the world of men doesn’t do enough to stop it, then they probably wouldn’t believe that the men’s group is somehow the open group that welcomes all challengers.

It’s like how most of you consume things that are bad and wrong. Hundreds of musicians that are really just a couple dudes writing hits. Musicians that pay to have their music played on stations. Musicians that take talent to humongous pipelines and churn out content. And it’s every industry, isn’t it?

So much flexing over what conveyor belt you eat from.

I’ve watched 30+ years of this slop. And now there’s ai. And now people that have very little soul, who put little effort into tuning their consumption, they get to make a bunch of noise about the lack of humanity in content.

Contestants must run through these brick walls, swim through the magma pool, climb the 50’ smooth steel wall, and jump the chasm before smashing the watermelon at the end! Only the top 8 killbots will move on to the next round.

Their Programming is now “we need to avoid WW3, Russia will nuke us, we need to avoid unnecessary bloodshed, it’s got nothing to do with us”

A bunch of them instantly became bleeding heart pacifists because wearing that hat let’s you say the things best things for the current news cycle.

I think I saw one or two people trying to say this has always been the conservative position. I mean what’s America first but being anti war? It’s like different trumpers just sit there in a plastic box waiting to be activated. Crickets when conservatives are doing X, Y, Z, but then suddenly these things appear when it’s convenient. Hey everyone, these magats didn’t call for political violence! These magats have always been against foreign wars!

To us: A former Toyota CEO kisses the ring.

To Trump: Mr. Domo Arigato bent the knee, this will look good for me.

To MAGA: We don’t want your jap crap, go back to China.

Dudes at a NASCAR event. The sport that had to specifically root out racists which was somehow a bad thing for conservatives.

My logic? People are acting like men’s divisions are the open divisions when it’s very much closed to anyone not wanting to endure constant harassment. I don’t think adding facts to the discussion implies any logic aside from the logic in valuing the truth.

Don’t forget when you were 5 years old and adults would tease you about marrying the girl you were playing with. It’s perfectly normal when they bring up heterosexual relationships with a child. They see two tiny children playing and they say, paraphrased, “you gonna bang her when you grow up? Teehee”

But telling children they can be gay or the gender they identify as is wrong, grooming, sexualizing children, etc.

We’re just supposed to enforce traditional roles I guess. If we want to teach kids who to fuck, we do it with traditional heckles like “are you two getting married when you grow up?”

Same chess where men creep on women and female grandmasters report being harassed whenever they try to compete alongside men?

I don’t think women feel welcome when you can accost them and if they say anything they’re just a bitch lying to cause problems.

Police get caught running searches on their ex girlfriends. Police are barely better than gangs and they’re using sophisticated tech to fuck with their local communities. Brilliant. Add the CEO of Flock to the list of persona non grata.

Vigilantes never had such big beautiful lists. Other presidents, other presidents, nuclear, other presidents never, and I was just saying, other presidents, because there are others, oh boy there are others, you don’t want to know about them though, but there are others, and I was saying, other presidents, look these are — I just shit my pants.

“If we assume X theorem is true, Y theorem is true, and lemma Z is true, then …”

This is actually about our models and seeing their incompleteness in a new light, right? I don’t think starting from arbitrary axioms and then trying to build reality was about proving qualities about reality. Or am I wrong? Just seems like they’re using “simulated reality” as a way to talk about our models for reality. By constructing a “silly” argument about how we can’t possibly be in a matrix, they’re revealing just how much we’re still missing.

Assume I read the article and then made a post.

It was a reddit post and a bunch of corpo news talking about the reddit post. Samsung didn’t trick anyone, the ML algorithms were always in the open, people just had to turn off the “scene optimizer” mode.

It definitely seems like it was a big thing but it’s hard to see if literally anything happened as a result or if anyone actually cared.

Republicans get higher bills but they know they’re on the right side, and so set to work building up the next link in the chain of lies.

Let’s watch as they create new lore. What surprising developments will come out, before becoming a thing every single one of them says they believe?

Today, XYZ has never touched the lips of a conservative. In one week, XYZ will be why they voted for whoever, whatever. XYZ will be a core belief championed by every true Republican.

I wonder what it means. If you search for music by Suicidal Tendencies then YouTube shows you a suicide hotline. What does it mean for OpenAI to say people are talking about suicide? They didn’t open up and read a million chats… they have automated detection and that is being triggered, which is not necessarily the same as people meaningfully discussing suicide.

I get looking at terrorism as a simple data point and then saying left wing terrorism is on the rise. When there’s more violence then it’s indicative of underlying problems.

But most of the time the conversation implies people need to clean up their act. Politicians must stop using charged language. People must chill out.

In that vein, I’m curious how much left wing violence is real. When people are getting shot down for trying to get abortions, getting put on lists…

That’s like playing half a chord progression.

But when you fight back, that’s also a terrorism. Hitting the bully is still violence, and can’t we all just chill?? Lmao

Male wolf spiders may hang back and watch mating pairs from the shadows, learning how to successfully attract a mate. Just like us fr

If groceries cost us $500 per month and our government says it accepted $10 from an anonymous donor to help pay for next months groceries, what does it mean?

Like what just happened? Did they just make a joke / are they fucking with people?

Are they only funding their gestapo? Are they strategically activating specific personnel via a check, and ignoring less critical or more motivated soldiers?

It’s as if someone threw some coins at the crowd just for a chance to talk about how it’s the Democrats who “opted” not to pay them. I wish they more deliberately explored the “it costs billions to pay the military yet the 130 million is gonna do… something” part of the story.

I’d take the $1000 and then pay someone $100 to tell me I’m beautiful.

Hegseth has shitty tattoos but we talk about him leaking chats, shit policy, chastising the troops, being a sloppy drunk. Lots of REAL reasons to dislike Hegseth.

But this guy… people just bring up his tattoos?