• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Touche…

      Pour one out for project Ara, everyone… And the hundreds of other companies that had a bright future before Google bought and destroyed them.

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you should never adopt Google services, there’s a high chance they will kill it off given their awful track record.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really get what the hate was for Google+, it was better than the alternative/competitor at the time (Facebook)

    • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was definitely much better than Facebook at the time. Especially the concept of circles that they implemented.

    • twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The concept of who you chose to share your status was cumbersome. It at least not auntie or uncle friendly

      I don’t remember what it was called? Spaces?

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t remember what it was called? Spaces?

        Circles. It was a killer feature at the time, the idea of different feeds for different groups, all in one profile. Too bad there weren’t enough groups to make it useful.

    • TheyKeepOnRising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google+ forced itself on people. I didn’t want it so I stopped using my Gmail entirely. I imagine word of mouth caused people to avoid it.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the ridiculous part on top of that is that it was the exact opposite situation at first. When it first launched, you had to be a friend of a friend of a Google employee to register or you weren’t getting in. It took me a about a month before a friend of mine studying CompSci at university with the kid of some Google employee was able to pass an invitation my way.

        I get the purpose was to generate hype by making it seem “exclusive” like Facebook was in the early days, but it took way too long before the people who genuinely wanted to use it were allowed to openly register for it. It was like that for 3 months, and a lot of people who gave up on trying to get an invite lost interest after the initial buzz died down.

        And then Google wasn’t satisfied with upsetting the people that wanted to use it, so they had to go and upset the people who didn’t want to use it by later forcing it on everyone with a Google account.

        • snor10@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s kind of funny, isn’t this exactly what Meta is doing to everyone with an Instagram account? You have a shadow profile on Threads regardless if you signed up or not.

          I wonder why the reaction is so different, maybe because they both are social media? Or maybe just good timing with the whole Twitter debaucle.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think there is still concern. When Threads launched, the media was full of articles outlining commonly-stated concerns about privacy and the involuntary connection between Instagram and Threads.

            The problem is that zoomers who are flocking to it in droves don’t seem to care about any of that. And I don’t think it’s due to ignorance, but probably more like generational defeatism.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google wasn’t comfortable in letting it grow naturally over time. They tried really hard to push on people by combining it with other more popular google products when it didn’t really make sense (i.e. Youtube). Also, as a teen at the time google plus just felt nerdy and weird. It didn’t really feel like something they cool kids would use so no one used it.

      • R51@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s how I felt too. I remember being excited about g+, then I also remember aggressively turning off any association to g+ because no one was on it and it kept pushing it in my face. Come to think of it gmail was similar, invite only and that, but it wasn’t forced even at release and they made it look a lot nicer than what yahoo and hotmail had going on at the time.

  • BeezKnuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean this post has 1200 upvotes. Considering most people don’t engage with the voting system that makes me think that there’s a decent amount of people here. At the very least it means there’s a lot of people here who engage with the community. More come every day. If this post were on Reddit, it would be on r/all right now. That’s not bad for a community with a fraction of the users.

    I think that in 10 years this place will be doing alright. I think the growth that’s happened in the last few months won’t last, but I think that growth will still steadily happen. The reddexodus doesn’t happen every day but with most social media platforms shitting their geriatric pants more and more lately, I think a consistent flow of refugees will come here.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I kind of feel like a single Lemmy instance will domonate dominate and become the defacto instance that everyone just joins.

    • H4Lambda@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The whole system is crap.

      We should have gotten something that’s actually decentralised and P2P like Aether.

      What we got was centralised servers + a glorified RSS feed that enables even more echo chambers than Reddit did… The fediverse is doomed to remain irrelevant imho

    • CCL@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a big help to avoid this is if any “official” apps automatically point to something like lemmyverse search or Fediverse Observer rather than Join Lemmy or any single instance.
      Mastodon.socialwas already by far the largest before the only app named “mastodon” available in the major mobile repositories was built to automatically have you create an account on mastodon.social to “Make it easier for the normies”.

      The fact that I dont’ even know the name of any lead developers of #lemmy as opposed to /u/gargon@mastodon.social is probably a good sign too.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that’s against the plan with Lemmy and distributed instances, but they can improve sign up, and make it possible to migrate your user between instances, or do some unique username across all instances.

      A cool feature would also be that a user could backup all their posts and votes.

  • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google+ didn’t work because they didn’t push it hard enough and they made it an invite only beta instead of just allowing everyone to join.

    Yes - I’m being serious they didn’t push it hard enough. If you had a Gmail or YouTube account it should have just instantly become a Google+ account in some sort of private mode so it doesn’t inadvertently leak your info.

    If they would have just pushed it out to everyone, day one, mandatory, no opt out, then we’d still have Google+ today.

    Like if they made Google Talk the default messaging client on Android we’d still have Google Talk. I don’t recall Apple making iMessage an optional messaging app you don’t have to use.

    • Flat Pluto Society@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should’ve called it Google Circles. Google Plus just sounded like some kind of premium subscription to Google and not like a social network.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve been running around the Fediverse for two years now and the name has yet to grow on me. Makes it slightly difficult to explain to people who are interested. The “iverse” part makes it sound like a metaverse type project which gives some people pause -because of the hype-flop cycle and, of course, all the crypto scams associated with that. Have to begin the pitch with “but it has nothing to do with [that], so don’t worry.” (Edit because autocorrect)

    • Therevev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a huge motorhead fan. The name is a not insignificant part of why I chose this as a reddit alternative over the others

      • Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just think it ultimately sounds like a lousy c-grade 3rd party app. Then again, Mastodon isn’t much better. At least Reddit is basically witty.

    • Venutian Spring@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care about the name much, but it’s going to make searching for anything on here through a regular search engine cumbersome. Lemmy is just going to bring up results to the late motorhead singer

  • GlitchSir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    By then I predict the big corp news media will report on Lemmy like it’s the new 4chan. Unmoderated instances that no major instance links to will give them plenty of ammunition. Non technical users will believe it to the frustration of all Lemmy.

    Not trying to be a downer when they attack you, you know you’re winning

  • thann@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy will be a dinosaur like hacker news and we’ll all use a bunch of different softwares to connect to the fediverse

    • elkaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would wager most of nowadays instances have either fallen into obscurity or just finished existing, I think we will see instancea more focused in scalability if thr fediverse grows in popularity, whoch will kind of dominate the space.

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly hope lemmy will not die. It will have to become simpler though. For many people, it will be simply way too complicated to wrap their head around the fact of many instances and most of them will worry about not being able to interact with people from other instances.

    Also, the main lemmy web app is not necessarily good and alternatives such as wefwef are far easier to use.

    • Deuces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We just need to be better about simplifying the explanation. Don’t tell people “it’s a federated website using an activitypub backend to communicate like mastodon, but only links to federated lemmys not including mastodon instances…” Tell them “it’s a fourm that shares posts and comments with other fourms that agree to work together”. If they want more detail they can easily find it themselves.

      • DSX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like the explanation using email as an example works pretty well. Most people understand how different emails from different providers can communicate, but their account is hosted on one platform.

        • narF@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even better is to talk about phone carriers, because people seem to know those better than emails these days. “Just because your phone is using Carrier A doesn’t mean you can’t call your friends on Carriers B and C”

  • Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I loved Google+ at the time but I was invested in the Google services ecosystem back then.

  • Omsorg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually liked Google plus… but like everything Google create, they killed it.

      • JoYo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        per post scoping was nice.

        I didn’t have to manually tag each account, just select the circle and publish.

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only place I’ve ever accidentally uploaded a dick pic and so glad I had like 2 friends on there who never checked lol. It was a fun 2 weeks.