• potpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      127
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay billions for a userbase, then drive away the ones that aren’t Nazis or bots.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Been saying it for a while, but his plan was to run it into the ground all along. Who is he buddy-buddy with in public? The Saudi’s and the Russians, who both have an interest in seeing Twitter burn to the ground. He started by laying off people, not paying their bills, and making stupid brand decisions. This has been the plan all along and there’s really no other logical explanation. 44 billion is nothing to the Saudis and Russian oligarchs if it takes away a key tool for organized dissent and the spread of western ideals.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay 54 billion dollars to utterly destroy a platform which gave normal people the ability to effectively spread information about the wrongdoing of the upper class, and which often promoted that very information.

      That’s why he did this, he knows it’s killing g Twitter and wants it dead.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lessons for whom? I have several things I would like to kill but lack the requisite trillions to execute my vision.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know I wonder if we could create a non profit that exists only to buy things and then donate them (IP, closed source, whatever) to the public domain. If you had a savvy board, such an organization could do a lot of good.

          Something like this must already exist, right?

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean they would need to be paid, but idk about a percentage. Mostly just to fairly compensate them for the time spent vetting deals.

              • jarfil@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s savvy about getting paid just for your time? You need to get paid for expertise, opportunities, networking… that’s at least 10%, since a non-profit wouldn’t have preference shares.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m leery about a percentage just because I perceive a conflict of interest. Overall compensation of 10% might be about right, but tying actual compensation to the cost of stuff that is bought creates a perverse incentive to overspend on things. That’s money donated for the betterment of humanity, not so I can have a 3 acre swimming pool.

                  But IDK maybe I’m looking at it wrong.

    • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can throw Warner Brothers Discovery in there while you are at it (HBO now stupidly referred to as “Max”)

        • Lemmington Bunnie@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re literally a household name.

          I grew up poor in Australia, and no one really had pay TV around me - least of all the people I hung with. Over the years, you’d still learn through other TV shows and movies that HBO was the channel with the good stuff.

          Why change that? Why lose such branding? Have they become associated with something that they don’t want to be? If not, leave great enough alone.

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just saw a trailer for an adventure time spin off on a youtube channel called “Max” and though it was a random channel that post trailer lol. Granted i rarely watch anything and while i know about HBO i don’t ever remember watching anything from them.

        • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I watched a South Park movie for the first time in years. In this one they traveled into the future. Everything had Max or Plus added to the name. It seemed pretty spot on with where we are going

      • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get the feeling that these execs need a plan to increase profits every quarter, and this is one of the gotos.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they start focusing on the brand, it’s over.

    I was part of a “startup” that was all volunteers. We called ourselves Citizens Market, and the idea was to produce an app that let you scan a barcode to get ethical info on the company who made the product.

    Like GoodGuide, but they got to market faster.

    After a few years of effort, a marketing person joined our all-volunteer team and convinced the head to change the name to Fosfo. Why Fosfo? Because matches have phosphorous in them, and so it referenced illumination, and the illumination had to do with our mission of … you guessed it: providing information.

    The thing failed. I mean, we were already failing because we didn’t have the profit motive cutting our decisions down to what worked. But the name “Fosfo” was when I knew the project was dead.

    “Citizens Market” was the perfect name for what our app would do. But no, had to have some web 2.0 jackass giving us a facelift. That was our path to salvation: a rebrand.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s a stunted 8 year old who associates X with edginess. X factor. X Men. X Ray. X rated films. XXX. All super fucking cool

      • Chahk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He originally wanted “Model 3” to be called “Model E” so that the three (at the time) Tesla models could spell out “SEX”. Fortunately that name was already taken. He’s a petulant child.

        • CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll admit, BACK THEN, I thought it was funny and was sad E was taken. But yeah perspective changes when you realize how much worse he is/was/will be.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      X.com is his product he owned, that is loosely associated with PayPal’s success despite it having nothing to do with the tech that it was merged for.

      By “absorbing” twitter with his original X company that is older than twitter, he can pretend to be the founder of the parent company X, like he pretends to be the founder of Tesla.

  • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can think of when he talks about how “X will be an app for everything” is:

    Welcome to Zombocom, you can do anything at Zombocom, Welcome to you. Anything is possible at Zombocom. The infinite is possible at Zombocom. The unobtainable is unknown at Zombocom. Welcome to Zombocom.

  • Hexorg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    What was that about him doing twitter’s technology policing and leaving running the company to the new CEO?

  • patchymoose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    It must be incredibly frustrating to be the new CEO that he just appointed, only to have him continuing to run his mouth and make ruinous decisions that tie your hands.

  • Snapz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only clearer by the day that this was all an exercise to intentionally kill Twitter to the benefit of billionaires, fascists and other extremists.

    Twitter existed as a relatively free and open public space to communicate, organize and assemble to take actions for and against things at scale before musk (e.g. The Arab Spring, a terrifying moment for the Saudis especially - the second largest shareholder behind musk).

    When people collectively laughed at elon and his cringe, inbred, emerald boy antics or his humiliating divorce and other routine failures, Twitter was the bullhorn.

    Now elon and his desperate far right Toadies will work to try to rewrite reality so they can eventually have this conversation:

    "Twitter? What’s a Twitter? Wait, are you talking about blork? A bird? No, blork’s logo is a dinosaur with chainsaw arms… and everyone wants to be his best friend… and it’s against the law to divorce him… and he’s cool… and…"

    What an everlasting tool history will remember you as, elon. If they remember you at all, it will be to laugh at you - you’ll never outrun that.

  • Techviator@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Xwitter by Musk - the best social media in all 4 corners of this Flat Earth! Starting at $8* per month.

    *Basic plan has a limit of 50 xweets per month.

  • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    In ten years some kids in a discord round robin gonna ask why the fake social media in fanfiction are little blue birds. Wait they used to be real??