• spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Is female derogatory? I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

      Edit: I work at a large engineering and manufacturing company where some of our products need to take into consideration the difference between male and female anatomy. I just hear “male” and “female” systems discussed on a weekly basis so I think I might sometimes refer to men and women as “male” and “female” outside of work without giving it a second thought.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

        Scientifc classification by sex. Referring to others by their biological sex in a social context is weird and creepy. Even if you believe sex and gender are the same thing, it’s still weird to call people by their sex. “Hello, male human. Want to ingest some fried pieces of cow flesh tonight?”

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you are calling a woman “a female”, and aren’t a cop discussing a victim or a doctor writing a chart, then yes, it’s fucking derogatory.

        We’re not Ferengi.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yep. A lot of incels seemingly are unfamiliar with scientific classification and try to use it in casual statements.

          Like, they sound real stupid trying to redirect it to be about science then saying phrases like “boobs and tits”.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

        It’s a classification of sex like biological characteristics, like chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive organs.  Are you asking about that?

        Gender is a social construct. Just like race. Where you can be a Black person who is British. Or a Filipino American.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Using scientific terminology in colloquial speech is weird and creepy in most contexts. Calling kids “juveniles” and women “females” carries certain connotations, most of them bad.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        Using female as a noun (rather than as an adjective, such as in the phrase “female firefighter”, or any phrase of the format “female $noun”) is generally overly clinical and dehumanizing. Some people do it out of habit due to their profession-- usually researchers or soldiers-- but they usually say “males and females”, which while still weird isn’t the worst.

        The guys who say “men and females” are the ones you need to watch out for.

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not inherently derogatory, but it does hold a connotation if you refer to women as females particularly in contexts where you wouldn’t/don’t refer to men as males.

      • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yes, using scientific terminology can be derogatory. But in this case, acting like the opposite sex is a species on its own, classifying them as animals and slurring all women as hoes gave it away for me.