not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.netEnglish · 17 days agoemptyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down11
arrow-up122arrow-down1imageemptyslrpnk.netnot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.netEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-216 days agoThe review goes over some of the methodology. and believe it on pure subjective opinion. I’m not saying that. Edit: if you’re saying it’s based on nothing then I expect you to have looked into it, yes
minus-squarereactionality@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·16 days agoWhy should I, as the person receiving a meme, research why it is based on fact and not fiction? That’s not how the burden of proof works.
minus-squarereactionality@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·16 days agoAny media with years, density, “shifting baseline syndrome” is not a meme, it’s an infograph disguised as a meme. So yes, your “meme” requires proof. And you’re a propagandist idiot if you think otherwise.
The review goes over some of the methodology.
I’m not saying that.
Edit: if you’re saying it’s based on nothing then I expect you to have looked into it, yes
Why should I, as the person receiving a meme, research why it is based on fact and not fiction?
That’s not how the burden of proof works.
Do memes need burden of proof?
Any media with years, density, “shifting baseline syndrome” is not a meme, it’s an infograph disguised as a meme.
So yes, your “meme” requires proof. And you’re a propagandist idiot if you think otherwise.