Exhibit 8509776654 of why Democrats are pathetic

  • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The difference is that basically anyone nominated after Rubio would be worse. He’s basically the best person put forward by this admin, as sorry as that is.

    Sounds more like damage control than much else. That they have to do because, you know, America thought they didn’t have to bother voting dem because it’s whatever. Hence gestures around

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If zero Dems voted for Rubio then Rubio would still be in the same position but the Dems wouldn’t look like jackasses for giving him votes. It wasn’t damage control, it was a self goal.

      How is rolling over for the Republicans going to work for them in the next election?

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe it wasn’t that then. I don’t say I support it but I’m guessing they were thinking (old school) that if they voted for someone who of course they don’t like but is actually a somewhat serious candidate that the Republicans would respond by nominating more like that.

        But again, that kind of thinking is still going on in the Dem party and obviously outdated. One would think they’d learn that there is no give and take with this batch of Republicans. At all.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have no idea how the old guard can’t understand how much things have changed in the last few decades when that is their full time job.