I shudder to think what Dutton’s response would have been, though.
Nice. “Urge” a little bit more, that’s the ticket there mate.
Australian government backs it.
Not all Australians
There was a guy who torture and killed dogs on video a while back. Guy was doxxed as a taxidermist with a house in the outback. Locals hunted him down and burned his house down before the cops could do anything. I don’t think anyone was ever charged with a crime.
I don’t know what this has to do with this but it feels relevant somehow
Yet, the greens received less votes and were the only party with an anti genocide agenda. Like America, Australia was uncaring at best.
The country gets the representation it voted for.
The greens are a flip flop party who will knock down a decent solution because it’s not perfect.
That’s what the Australians I know think of them.
Sticking to principles is the opposite of flip plop. I agree, they are not pragmatic, though. However, no other party with a chance at a seat was anti genocide. If they did the same or better, the argument could be made that aussies care. They did worse nationally. Aussies don’t care.
Be nice if some more people understood that about the US.
Yeah… No. The vast majority supported the genocide, either enthusiastically or through lesser evil politics. And no I’m not talking about voting for Harris; I’m talking about the liberal reaction to pro-Palestine protests and Uncommitted.
Most Americans are checked out.
Sure. Are Australians more checked in?
yeah, just another weak politician.
i hope he knows he has failed his younger self.
Dutton, or the snake that replaced him, would be pushing for more.
So, yeah, I’m not happy with this answer. But it’s still better than the alternative.
Take fucking note, white lily American no-voters.
The US electoral system is utterly fucked. At least voting for a third-party in Aus can make some sort of difference.
