• rastilin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    296
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    TPM is basically never for your benefit. It’s becoming a requirement because Microsoft is going to one day say “you can only run apps installed from the Windows Store, because everything else is insecure” and lock down the software market. Valve knows this which is why they’re going so hard on the Steam Deck and Linux.

      • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It seems unlikely Valve will ever make Windows the primary OS for their devices. And they’d lose a lot of user support if they ever required the TPM for their own software, so hopefully they wouldn’t risk it.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why does everybody seem to think that userspace attestation is the only use for the TPM? The primary use is for data to be encrypted at rest but decrypted at boot as long as certain flags aren’t tripped. TPM is great for the security of your data if you know how to set it up.

          Valve is never going to require TPM attestation to use Steam, that’s just silly. Anti-cheat companies might, but my suggestion there is to just not play games that bundle malware.

          • fred@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whatever is touted as the primary use doesn’t matter as much as what anti-user features it enables.

            • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Anti-user features which are enabled by games and programs that were already anti-user before this. Hardly worth getting upset about, nothing has really changed. You already should have been avoiding them, because they were already anti-user.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I doubt they would risk it as well, but the point is that it exists on the SteamDeck and can be utilized.

            • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              TPM is basically never for your benefit. It’s becoming a requirement because Microsoft is going to one day say “you can only run apps installed from the Windows Store, because everything else is insecure” and lock down the software market. Valve knows this which is why they’re going so hard on the Steam Deck and Linux.

              This is the comment I was replying to. I was simply pointing out that for a company “going hard” on SteamDeck and Linux, it’s curious that they would spend any amount of effort at all enabling the TPM to allow people to run Windows. I guess my point is I don’t think they’re “going hard” quite as much as the person I responded to thinks.

              Also it was just pointing out that this specifically can affect the SteamDeck since they use an AMD processor with AMD fTPM.

              • jaykstah@waveform.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                They are “going hard” the way I see it. Without Valve doing legwork behind the scenes and collaborating with anticheat developers we wouldn’t even have Apex Legends running on Linux like we’ve had for a year and a half. They’ve been talking about wanting to use Linux as a viable PC gaming platform to escape Microsofts lockdown of their platform since the days of Steam Machines when Windows 8 and the new store app were giving bad signs.

                Either way Valve would be silly not to provide a compatible way to use Windows on the Deck. Even though the situation is much better these days, they know very well that a lot of enthusiast PC gamers would be dismissive of the Deck if Windows couldn’t work properly on it and that word of mouth would bring less confidence in the product.

                • Bulletdust@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Does EAC work correctly playing Apex Legends under Linux? If it does I’ll download the game tonight.

              • rastilin@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t see how it affects the Steam Deck. It’s entirely possible that the Steam Deck supports fTPM purely because it was part of the motherboard template Valve chose and it would have been more trouble to change it than to just leave it in.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Support for old software is now the only reason to use windows.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a big fan of Linux, but I can’t believe you really think this.

        • bluejay@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sadly, I agree. I’m at the point now where as long as I’m not trying to game I can thrive on Linux. But even then I spend way more time than necessary getting things to work that do so out of the box on Windows. We have a long way to go before legacy apps is the only reason to run it.

          • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I found the time I saved from not having any control over my system has more than made up for tinkering that I have to do to get things running. My laptop would regularly become unusable for 20+ minutes on windows because of disk performance issues, and I as the user had no means to prevent windows from running the service that locked everything up. That along with other times windows just decides your use case is less important have added up to far more time then having to debug a game here and there

            • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ungh, yeah I used to have that problem with my laptop when I was in college.

              I only booted it up for classes unless I had a test coming up I needed to study for or something. Because why the fuck would I not do that - I had a regular computer at home for everything else.

              Every couple weeks, that meant it was updating instead of being available for note taking, and usually for the entire hour I needed it. Because apparently setting the updates to run during shutdown wasn’t good enough, they needed to be run on boot, because fuck you that’s why.

              Linux is just… hey I should probably update this shit at some point… meh, tomorrow.

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The people that prefer Windows for gaming are not the people that will have performance issues on an OS basis, their rig is powerful enough to run complex games, the OS based performance loss is negligible in comparison. Hell, I sometimes don’t reboot the work computer for days and it doesn’t freeze at all. The system is on an SSD and there are no hiccups nor disk performance issues. In any case, with current day prices, buying a new m2 stick and new ram is less than 100€ total, and to be honest, I’d rather pay that and be fine for 4-5 years than spend a big part of my free time trying to make witcher 3, baldur’s gate 3, path of exile, tons of steam games and league working perfectly for Linux. It’s just not worth it.

              I use WSL for work because coding in a Linux environment is better but I still need access to office tools, because companies work with those tools.

              Linux won the servers war, but it still has to do much to win the home/work computer war.

    • Ret2libsanity@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      TPM is pretty important in any modern OS.

      Sure you don’t need it. But it’s not 2013. It should be standard along with FDE