• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine looking around that classroom and thinking “All is right with this”.

        • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you read the Old Testament? The deity in that book is not what I’d consider benevolent. He’s also really insecure, requiring that his followers only worship him, which doesn’t at all sound like an abusive partner separating a person from their familial relationships to isolate them.

          Heck, in the New Testament he (because somehow a sky deity has a penis) sent his son to be killed horrifically, and because he is both omnipotent and omniscient, he knew exactly what to do to stop said horrific death at the hands of the Romans.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the thing with religious people. They don’t think. They’re told this is what God wants and that’s the end of it. That’s why it’s so important to keep churches out of government.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            38
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know but I think it is important to emphasize. God as an abstract concept is not as bad as God as the personal total micromanaging god of Islam.

            • Plopp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              41
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Neither is an abstract concept. They are the same exact deity from the same story and the same origin.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                1 year ago

                No they aren’t. There is a lot of difference between an Enlightenment era diest god, a local tribal god, and a triomni god.

                What do you care anyhow? It isn’t like Islam is monotheistic. They have Satan and dijins.

                • Obinice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re talking about God (such as the god of Islam and Catholicism, which is the same god) and gods, as in the concept of a god, which encompasses sun gods, Aztec gods, etc etc.

                  Usually I find how you capitalise matters here. God with a capital is a name, and talking about the “God” most people talk about.

                  A god, on the other hand, well you get the idea.

                  Anyway in this case we’re talking about the god of Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, etc. This god is the same god, and in English we would call that god “God”. Allah is that god’s name in another language. But it’s the same deity.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I especially like that guy in the back. That could be the teacher, but I guess that it’s someone who observes that the God is feared enough and nothing disallowed happens.

      Makes me wonder how one makes such career choices, too

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      They must thank Allah every day for America’s Oligarchy gifting the military industrial complex trillions of dollars of tax payer money, and occupying their country for decades, to end up stuck in the same prison as their parents… Instead of the darkest timeline — universal healthcare and climate action!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least it was a chance. We certainly fucked up in Afghanistan but it’s not like the Taliban came back from nowhere.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          People act like the Afghani army that the US spent years trying to rebuild didn’t just up and run away.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you raise your kids to believe in Allah you are setting up your grandchildren to live like this. Oppose religion, wherever you see it.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can’t just equate religion with fascism. Not that I think religion is ethical or even separable from fascism, but they aren’t the same. Plenty of people practice religion without resorting to extremism.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think I did. Cancer and heart disease are not the same despite both having very similar results given enough time.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If I did I am sorry. There is no way I can make a claim like that. If nothing else the world could end long before the process finished. There is a link between the two but it does not mean that a society with monotheism will have to, 100% of the time with no exceptions, eventually become a fascist one.

        • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not the commenter, but I assume they talk about the nature of Abrahamic religions.

          Technically, Judaism, Christianity and Islam are just three updates of the same religion. First came Torah, then it got transformed into the Old Testament and completed with the New one to get the Bible, and then Bible itself got completed to get Quran.

          With that came one abrahamic God - referred to as Yahweh in Judaism, Trinity in Christianity (note: Islam goes back and denies Trinity and godly nature of Jesus, calling him a prophet, not element of God, and rolling back on Holy Spirit, too, reinstating Father God as the only source of godly power), and Allah in Islam.

          Thereby cancelling Allah means also cancelling Trinity and Yahweh, as they’re actually one and the same.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t get it. Thor is not the same as Allah/God, even though he is a Norse god.

      • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        All organized religion is ripe for abuse by its uncontrollable masters. It’s almost like communism in that!

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be equally as effective as praying to an electron as it is to pray to skydaddy. Also you are very unlikely to send a country back to the dark ages by praising the wave function.

        Fine, I tentatively approve of this religion. You have my blessing. Go with photon my son.

      • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you know that, mathematically, there can be a three-dimensional universe that closes in on itself? If you went in a straight line, you would always end up coming back to the same place.
        Believe in math! Or more specifically, with whoever says they understand math!

        • cannache@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but not always and besides whose to say that we are requesting the past, or whether we’re really just experiencing an increase in empathy beyond our usual limits? Maybe this is our evolution that we’re experiencing, just like COVID may have been China’s black death…

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What do you mean covid may have been China’s black death? China experienced yersinia pestis back when it was plaguing Europe, so black death was already China’s black death, maybe even before it was Europe’s black death.

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a hypothesis that we haven’t managed to understand how to even test yet, come on

        • Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? There have been hundreds of experiments confirming many different hypotheses of quantum physics…

          The photoelectric effect you have seen nearly every day (have you every used a modern camera with auto-iris? What about solar power?)

          The double-slit experiment proves that subatomic particles can act as both a particle and a wave, which is pretty instrumental in further theories of QM.

          Freedman-Clause verified quantum entagnlement.

          Usage of Nuclear energy for both bombs and generating electrical power…

          Superconductors and Cooper-pairs.

          Even the other poster joking about the Copenhagen interpretation - Copenhagen lead to discoveries in Qubit measurement (read up on Quantum State Tomography).

          Quantum physics isn’t one single, independent theory… And it keeps evolving as our understanding changes.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      88
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well that’s pretty reductionist, and bigoted. If you’re going to judge Muslims by their extremists then you can’t leave out the Christians and Jews. Hell Jewish extremists in Israel are committing genocide as we speak.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet they specifically reference Allah. And elsewhere in the comment section they try and say Allah is different from the Judeo-Christian “God”.

          • jamhandy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re allowed to use a specific example to make a general point.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              33
              ·
              1 year ago

              Funny how that seems to happen with minorities and Islam but not white people.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s literally a line used against people protesting for minority rights. It’s not racist to call out problematic stuff.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Literally nobody mentioned race.

                And aside from that, you’re wrong anyway. People criticise “white” religious beliefs too. A lot.

                Like, you’ve never heard people hating on the catholic church and the people who support it for turning a blind eye to sex abuse scandals? Seriously?

                Or about the religious Christian crazies in the US? You’ve never heard about that?

                Or the cult that is Scientology? Is that something you’re unfamiliar with?

                Fuck off with this trying to frame criticising a religion or pointing out its harmful effects as being racial bigotry.

                It’s not racism, and you know it isn’t. You’re just indirectly supporting actual bigotry that Islam pushes against women, LGBT people, and non-believers.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes. Specific things about Christianity are complained about. That doesn’t mean bigots aren’t out there spreading islamophobia.

                  Oh look an example of someone using an extremist group to paint all Muslims. And trying to cover it with the weird religions in there once.

                  And if you think race is the only kind of bigotry going, I have a bridge to sell you.

          • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who the f cares? Allah and Jahweh and trinity are all just made up feel good stories to ABUSE HUMANS

              • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nope, not at all. All of France Holland Germany Nordic are NOT religious and we have some decades of experience with the islamites. Blegh

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lmao. I’m sorry, your argument is you’re not religious extremist, you’re just a racist?

                  Oh God, that’s the laugh I needed.

                  Especially because there’s still 10-20 percent depending on your country. And you’re just falling into the propaganda created by the extremists among them.

          • shastaxc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But the Muslim, Christian, and Jewish god is the same deity. So “Allah” refers to the god of all 3 religions.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then don’t specifically mention Allah. It’s one of the older propaganda methods. We don’t like the general group but fuck those guys specifically.

          Funny how all the commenter needs to do to clear things up is edit their post. Instead you guys are all trying to make excuses.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How dare they use Allah as an example of a god, in a submission about the harmful effects of Islam!

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, breed more islamophobia. Most Muslims don’t want this. It’s like using the FLDS as an example of all Christians.

              • Bremmy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which is why “oppose religion” means all of them. No exceptions

      • JustMy2c@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, allllllllll of them abuse their fake man on the cloud to rape and kill children. No joke.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The evidence of religion ruling people’s lives is right in front of you and you act like we are drawing conclusions from nothing.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              38
              ·
              1 year ago

              Religion can be toxic, but so can non-religious nations like Russia under Putin.

              The real shit is money and power - those are what kill and lie and steal from the billions of us who haven’t yet got to the point of revolution.

              If nothing else we know it’s coming … and when it does it’ll be massive and worldwide.

              • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Putin embraces the Russian Orthodox Church as part of his nationalism. Also, Russia is only 13% atheist. Hardly a non-religious nation.

                But, you’re right, power is the real point. Religion is just one of the most hateful methods of justifying and maintaining power.

                Democracy with socially regulated capitalism, in our experience, has a lighter touch and has thus far provided a lot of benefits to the vast majority of people.

                You mention revolution, but don’t specify from what or to what? Revolutions have a way of not going quite the way the idealists hope they will.

              • yuriy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Russia is 72% Eastern Orthodox by population. The US is estimated to be ~63% split between flavors of christianity, for comparison.

              • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                So, you’re close but wrong country. Russia tried to get rid of religion but failed. The Russian Orthodox Church just kind of became part of the government. That’s why you see the priests blessing Russian weapons and stuff.

                China on the other hand did get rid of religion pretty successfully. The reason communism strives to get rid of religion is because when people aren’t arguing over who’s imaginary supernatural friend loves his people more. It’s easier to get them to agree on things.

                Now, I’m not going to pretend that this is a perfect plan. After all successfully getting rid of religion comes with a whole new set of pitfalls. But, I personally think the pros outweigh the cons.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Religion can be toxic, but so can non-religious nations like Russia under Putin.

                You can die from snake venom. That doesn’t mean cancer is harmless.

                • chouri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I get what previous commenter said: the problem is the people with power wanting to control the population, religion is just the means to an end (sorry if this is not the correct way to say it). In my way of seeing it, religion as always been a cover to interests of the powerful, a way to keep the population controlled, or dumbed down. In the example of this thread, they are openly using this strategy by cutting access to education.

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bad people do bad things.

                But for a good person to do bad things, that takes religion.

                • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But for a good person to do bad things, that takes religion.

                  This sounds like it’s a prerequisite to be good before becoming religious … which historically is not the case.

                  Child molesters who entered the priesthood were not “good” before using the shelter of the Church to rape children.

                  Being “good” or “bad” is a conscious, moral decision which is maintained by every person choosing what is of the utmost importance for their life … selfish fulfillment or altruism.

                  … this is, ofc, setting aside mental health issues that do not allow some to make rational conscious decisions.

          • yuriy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            read a book

            Bible, Koran, Torah, Book of Mormon, The Vedas… you know there’s actually a lot of objectionable shit in all of these.

            I wonder if you meant some other books that support your ideals, jokes on me for reading the source materials instead I suppose.

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes sir! Only Bible!

            Anyway, pretty fucking weird society where they have to wrap 6th grade girls from head to toe to avoid feeling attracted to them.

        • yuriy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Religions can be harmful for certain dumb people who believe them. It’s not a given, but with the interconnectivity of today these dumb people can organize and create echo chambers, and be much more harmful to both themselves and others. A stark, anti-religion stance seems harsh, but it’s likely the most effective way to avoid these pitfalls.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        casually thinks back ONLY these last five years

        remembers all the excuses and acts committed whilst hiding behind religion

        suddenly falls into a wormhole and lands in 1095

        I dunno, seems fishy.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          One major problem with the Abrahamic religions is that they are too scholarly in regard to their religious texts. It is horrifying how much collective brainpower has been wasted on this complete and utter bullshit, that could instead have been spent discovering the true nature of the universe.

          You say that there are atheists who wish religious people to not exist. That is true, but perhaps not in the way you imply. The vast majority of atheists don’t want to see religious people killed, but rather freed from the bonds of religion, not only for their own good, but for the good of humanity. Religion is in the same category as poverty in terms of degradation and the wasting of human potential. Like poverty, it needs to be eradicated, not by eradicating the impoverished, but by improving education and social conditions.

        • TserriednichThe4th@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He is not wrong lol. His interpretation is just more “originalist”

          You can reform islam all you want but the text says what it says.

        • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          both men and women are equal in islam

          Quran 4:34 Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allāh has given one over the other and what they spend from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband’s] absence what Allāh would have them guard.2 But those from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; , forsake them in bed; and , beat them .4 But if they obey you , seek no means against them. Indeed, Allāh is ever Exalted and Grand.

          Nowhere is education banned for women specifically

          They are only allowed islamic education according to ijmaa https://youtu.be/sluWhFVw7h0?si=mc-OOq_hejDY02c_&t=525

            • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              very first hadith he quotes is da’eef (weak)

              According to whom?

              i don’t care what ‘Ashraf Ali Thanvi’ has to say

              Ashraf Ali Thanwi (often referred as Hakimul Ummat[a][5] and Mujaddidul Millat[b] (19 August 1863 – 20 July 1943) was a late-nineteenth and twentieth-century Sunni scholar, jurist, thinker, reformist and the revival of classical Sufi thought from Indian subcontinent during the British Raj,[6][7] one of the chief proponents of Pakistan Movement.[5] He was a central figure of Islamic spiritual, intellectual and religious life in South Asia and continues to be highly influential today.

              clearly he has done his homework and he holds good amount of authority and credibility.

              also the wiki page for the university mentions about the doccumentation

              Also even in that time you just couldn’t make any girl a slave, this was only for the prisoners of war, you were supposed to share your food and wealth with them and help them in tough works, I am not saying that having a slave is even remotely justified today, but what i am saying is that there is a lot more nuance to it

              please see the following link Recommendations VS LAW (The recommendation is to set a slave free for slapping, but the LAW is an owner will not be punished even if he kills his slave)

    • lilsolar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Infact, in thr quran, Allah encourages everyone to gather knowledge.

      These fuckers are making a mockery of Islam

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It isn’t about religion with any of these types. Rather, it’s about religion being a tool they can use so that those who do think it’s all about religion allow them to have authority.

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Religion is the second worst plague visited on humanity. As you say, the worst is the lust for power over others. Religion, especially the Abrahamic religions, is second because it is uniquely positioned to facilitate the ambitions of those who lust for power. Pure violence can subjugate a population for a while, but real, long-lasting, self-regulating, trans-generational oppression has usually required religion.

      • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brother, that’s literally the point of all religion. Religion is by definition a social institution intended as a tool for public influence.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t disagree with you but I think it’s important to draw a distinction between the motives for that influence, which I believe falls primarily between three possibilities: someone seeking to save souls (or true believers with no personal motive other than maybe getting points for their own soul), someone seeking to manipulate others into being good to each other, and someone just seeking personal power and who will adjust the “good” their religion supports based on their situation.

          They can all blur into each other, so reality is a bit more complicated than that, but what I wanted to express was that most (if not all) religious leaders present as the first, but some not insignificant portion of them (if not all) actually fall more into the 2nd or 3rd categories. They don’t believe in the same god that their followers believe in.

          I think most assume that they are true believers.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely reprehensible and repulsive. Sick fuckers are so scared of women that they will not let them be educated. Fuck those backwards ass sexist monsters. Indefensible

  • Thirdborne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll never forget, a few years into the war I asked what my Afghani colleague thought of the war. He told me “I hate the Taliban. When I was a boy they came to my village and slit all the men’s throats. NOT a few of the men. ALL of the men.” Leaving those people to suffer that regime was a greater crime than any we committed in the 20 years of occupation.

    • TserriednichThe4th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leaving those people to suffer that regime was a greater crime than any we committed in the 20 years of occupation

      This doesnt make any sense lmao.

      We tried. We failed. So we stopped.

  • hpca01@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is exactly what the alt-right Christian fucks want. I’m surprised that they don’t realize how much in common they have with the Taliban.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    My initial thought experiment on this was “could these girls migrate to the west on a visa to complete their studies and return?”, and then I went down the rabbit hole of the demographics of Afghanistan. Of a population of around 40m, 46% are under 15, which is mad! That’s potentially a lot of girls that will lose an education.

    I wonder if a remote education could be the way forward? Let these girls study remotely online, assuming they have some form of internet access available, and create a worldwide visa that would allow any Afghan girl that can pass a standard entry exam to attend university. While we have no need to provide children from another country an education, this would probably be a low-cost solution, and one that I imagine many rich philanthropists would happily provide as a grant.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      This solution sort of implies that the Taliban would allow it. Like the whole system over there isn’t designed to crush these women as a form of control. It’s not a lack of ability to educate them this is by design of their government.

      For a visa like this to work you’d need the government and the Men of the country to be in agreement with it happening. That currently isn’t the case. Providing a visa that almost no one will be able to use even if they wanted too would not only not help but could easily be something that’s pointed to as “we’re already providing a way for them to get educated and we don’t have to do anything else.”

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, under current laws women obviously can’t travel without a man present, so it would basically mean sending a full family over, or at the very least, a parent or partner with them.

        My main point of highlighting it was that it’s not a small number of people, and that the young population of Afghanistan isn’t anywhere near as small as I thought. A remote education might help, as it’s something that women can access without having a man present.

        • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The young population is really high in Gaza too. You often see that with poor nations.

          Not to bang on about this but, how are you building the infrastructure to get reliable internet (that the men won’t let women access anyway) to remote afghan villages that don’t even have running water?

          I think you’re wildly under estimating the control men have over women there. You also may be under the impression it’s just the government trying to control and crush these women, it’s not. The average man in Afghanistan is not only complicit but active in subjugating Afghani women. This isn’t about lack of access to education, it’s about lack of personhood and autonomy for women. Afghanistan has education, women just aren’t allowed to be educated.

          Edit: so I just realized you’re probably really young given the solutions you’ve proposed. (I reread and suggesting to send a full family/guardian can only be someone young or a troll.) I apologize if I’m coming off really harsh. The reality is just that men are actively trying to subjugate/control/own/deny basic human rights to women in some of these countries and your comments completely missing that got under my skin. My apologies.

          • EnderMB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Coming close to my forties, but I’ll take the youth comment! It’s not a serious suggestion, but more of a discussion starter to how help could be given in instances where women want an education AND their families support them.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It kind of makes sense because I bet the life expectancy in Afghanistan is not very high at all, so a higher percentage of the population would tend to be younger because of that.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s also the whole issue of, you know, not letting them in cuz they have no education or marketable skills

      we don’t just let people in

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In September 2021, a month after U.S. and NATO troops withdrew from Afghanistan following two decades of war, the Taliban announced that girls were barred from studying beyond sixth grade.

    The Taliban have defied global condemnation and warnings that the restrictions will make it almost impossible for them to gain recognition as the country’s legitimate rulers.

    Last week, U.N. special envoy Roza Otunbayeva expressed concern that a generation of Afghan girls is falling behind with each day that passes.

    Last week, an official in the Education Ministry said Afghan girls of all ages are allowed to study in religious schools known as madrassas, which have traditionally been boys-only.

    In another part of Kabul, 13-year old Setayesh Sahibzada wonders what the future holds for her.

    Analyst Muhammad Saleem Paigir warned that excluding women and girls from education will be disastrous for Afghanistan.


    The original article contains 327 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!