• zabadoh@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Too bad Jensen didn’t live in France.

    If a corporate leader or politician doesn’t have a mistress or some other extramarital affairs, they’re looked at with suspicion.

    To be fair, that may be the natural order of things:

    If you can afford it, why wouldn’t a rich and/or powerful male have a harem?

    • Akh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The issue is not the mistress, it appears the mistress was a spy for China

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        And the second one caused conflict of interest, being his subordinate.

        Don’t know yet what kind of law #3 breaks.

      • zabadoh@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sexual repression has its origins in Judeo Christian monotheistic religion, and religion is the opiate of the masses.

        So go ahead and be a sexually repressed prude.

        It’s how the elite want you to behave to keep you under their control.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 hours ago

          A harem is definitely not about control or a central figure in charge. Nope. /s

        • Godort@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Don’t worry honey, I’m not religious so I have no morals about non-monogamy.”

          “My wife? She knows I’m not religious so it’s fine.”