I feel we are going to keep seeing europe in general ratchet things up, as the concern of a trump presidency looms.
I agree, and I see no downsides to it. A stronger unified Europe is a stabilizer. The irony is that there was, at one time, a path for Russia to be included in that unity with Europe. Instead Putin chose unsuccessfully to try to build an empire.
I’ll go a few steps further. Whatever happens in the US, Europe is now heading to be a more united Europe, completely united as a federal collection of States. Europe will become effectively a super power with little reliance on the US militarily and financially. Europe has very little choice with Putin and Trump. This is if Europe can get its act together better and stave off their rifts such as Hungary and general foot dragging out of fear of Putin.
Meanwhile the US will most likely be left in a weakened position through isolation and huge internal divisions that are being caused by Trump and the Republicans. China’s push for soft power is also weakening the US.
There’s a lot of talk of Ukraine, Middle East and Taiwan developing into full war but I think the fourth conflict will be a civil one in the US if Trump gets to the Whitehouse. I hope I’m wrong.
The maximum bad would be Europe uniting to handle Ukraine and russia, the US not being involved, Europe pulling back on US military bases and trump agreeing in anger. This would greatly weaken the US in the next 100 years, and if and when China goes after Taiwan at some point after, the US may find itself leading “a collation of the few” while Europe sits that one out.
I mean I can see why it is necessary but the downside obviously is less money for social programs and improving peoples lifes. I guess we can thank Putin for that 🙁
That’s not really true. Because the money invested in the military goes back to the local economy. And it is a much more real economy than finance.
Well a good share goes back that’s true, but certainly not everything. I mean the plants could’ve also built school busses and ambulances instead of military vehicles, right? I was just pointing out that “no downsides” is a bit optimistic, the costs are very real. And it is a pity that in this day and age we still have to put up with that 🙁
I mean the plants could’ve also built school busses and ambulances instead of military vehicles, right? I was just pointing out that “no downsides” is a bit optimistic, the costs are very real. And it is a pity that in this day and age we still have to put up with that 🙁
You’re not recognizing the reality that existed before this if that is your stance. The plants were already building the military vehicles except those plants were in the USA with the vehicles being shipped to Europe for Europe defense. The difference in this particular aspect is that now Europeans will have a stronger hand in their own defense.
Well I guess if you consider “the west” as one common block then yes, maybe it is a net-zero game. And maybe that really is the fair assessment. But from the purely european point of view it sure was nice when we had a peace divident that we could invest elsewhere.
Well, indeed it is a cost for the society. But when people are forced to work to be allowed to live, the problem is not the workforce.
It is a pity in this day and age that there are still wars, but it is an even greater pity that we have to work artificial jobs to be allowed to live imo.
Money shouldn’t be a concern.
You’re not wrong, at least building military things does add value to society especially in times like these. Maybe working some bullshit job is worse in that regard 😉 Still I would prefer to live in a world that wouldn’t need both of these things.
deleted by creator
Ramping up of the Fascism propaganda for a decade. Especially on internet by gov actors like russia.
Trump is the face of American fascism.
deleted by creator
