• HurkieDrubman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    American cars having their brake lights and turn signals be the same light is stupid and dangerous.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 days ago

    When changing lanes or turning you are supposed to use the turning signal before doing the manouver. The turning signal is supposed to warn other drivers that you are going to do something. It doesn’t make any sense to use the turning signal when already mid-turning or while already changing lanes. Many drivers don’t seem to know that.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Things you will need to operate while driving your car shouldn’t have touch screen controls.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    That we’d all be better off if we accepted our own fallibility. That we are not perfect little robots, and as a result more tolerance and forgiveness in the world is necessary.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    That documentation is supposed to explain how a thing works to people who don’t know how it works. I know, sounds extremely obvious, but you’d be surprised how much documentation out there is written in a way, expecting you to already know what it’s talking about. No. I do not. It is the documentation’s job to explain ME what IT is talking about…

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    That other than a niche we specialize in, we’re pretty fucking dumb at everything else.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    Here’s one that’s not as consequential as other posts here. It’s not going to change the world, but would make things slightly better.

    Split lock washers are worse than useless. They’re supposed to be a spring against the bolt to help resist it turning back out over time. They don’t. If anything, they make it worse.

    Here’s a NASA publication on fastener design (because of course there’s a NASA publication on fastener design): https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424

    The lockwasher serves as a spring while the bolt is being tightened. However, the washer is normally flat by the time the bolt is fully torqued. At this time it is equivalent to a solid flat washer, and its locking ability is nonexistent. In summary, a Iockwasher of this type is useless for locking.

    This was published in 1990, but we’re still using this shit. Stop. There are many other kinds of fastener locking that work, like nylon locking nuts or threadlock, and we don’t need these.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The spices at the grocery store I’ve been going to for the past 25 years has had the spices alphabetized this entire time.

    Edit, I misread the question but I’m not fixing my response

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    stronger products need less advertising, so an over-advertised product is likely inferior.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Russia will not stop warring if Ukraine surrenders. Russia’s war will stretch to every corner of the earth.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    That you should never use the same password for more than one site, especially some random Chinese eshop. I don’t get why people refuse to use password managers, ffs…

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    We have figured out how to run everything, absolutely everything, in the 1950s.

    The original computer “AI” craze was started by “cybernetic systems” and for good reason. You probably only know of the bastardizations of “cyber-” that don’t have anything in common with the original concept.

    The original concept goes like this:

    1. set a goal
    2. perform an action
    3. measure how much impact that had, did it get you closer to your goal or not?
    4. If you are at your goal, you’re done,
    5. otherwise adjust your actions, got to 2. (This is “feedback” and the reason that word is now so common. People at the time knew)

    The faster you go through the loop, the faster you will figure out what works.

    You can measure anything you want, as vague is you want. Happiness, money, productivity. It’s the way democracy is designed to work, in which case the feedback is vague and the cycle time is measured in years. It runs your thermostats, in your home, big national power grid power plants. It’s how autopilots autopilot.

    The idea that “nobody could have predicted…” or “nobody responsible” is a myth. We have the science. We know how it works.

    Every failure we still experience is a failure we allow to happen. Because of profit, politics, or whatever.

    Didn’t catch something “going on for years”, maybe someone should check more often. “Crazy single individual causing a tragedy”? No, that’s a person at risk, probably with social or mental problems you didn’t take care of before, didn’t flag, and didn’t stop in time.

    “Nobody wants to work on our open source project” Really, how is your onboarding? Do people take a look at the docs/culture and run away screaming? Yeah?

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    *lemmings

    Probably people who yell at cyclists for following traffic laws, bonus points for them also violating said laws without repercussion.