• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago
    1. How is gender and race at all relevant for this joke?
    2. How is that picture appropriate for a professional networking site?
    3. Also, what did the dude google to find that picture?
    • bunitor@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      this is supposed to be one of those “take that, racist prick” stories. these are pretty common

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Isn’t it supposed to be like those riddles where the answer is that the doctor’s a woman?

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I refuse to believe that you don’t already know the answers to 1 and 2 and that you don’t have an inkling about 3

    • Arbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago
      1. The point of the joke is the rich man is racist and/or misogynistic.

      2. It’s just a picture of a woman?

      3. Probably something horny and vaguely racist.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Race is relevant because it’s the point of the joke (he’s racist, but his racism is foiled). Gender isn’t relevant. The picture is what makes this dude a lunatic. If I saw this shit and I worked with him I’d forward it to HR with the note “hey just file this one away, you don’t need to act on it right now but you’re definitely gonna want this receipt sooner or later”.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What in the joke makes him racist but not misogynistic?

        There’s nothing in the joke saying she’s either the only black person or the only woman in the bar. In fact you could say that there’s more pointing to him being misogynistic in that he says “this woman” and not “this black person”.

        To me it reads as both

        • spookex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That just depends on the order of attributes you prefer to use to refer to a person.

          For me gender or age would usually come first rather than race

          • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Okay, that’s a fair point as to that comment not making it more sexist than racist, but not for it only being racist. I don’t see anything in the story pointing to race over sex.

            • spookex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I would argue that mentioning race at all is what makes it more of a racist thing.

              Like, why say that woman was black at all then?

              But it’s all just semantics, it’s a fake story that has both aspects in it, and it doesn’t really matter if it’s one or the other

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Who gives a shit about any of that since this was literally stolen from the opening scene of crazy rich Asians.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Was the man’s name JD Vance?

    Also, are we supposed to believe that someone is not buying the lady pictured here a drink??

    • Breezy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Well shes just kinda crouching in the corner quietly judgeing everyone with an un happy look. Then says thank you whenever someone buys something. I wouldve stayed clear of her too.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I should design a userscript that completely removes the “social” feed of LinkedIn. Then I might actually use it, without being bombarded by the weirdest narcissistic attention seeking behavior I’ve ever seen.

    • drd@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      For now anyway you can use ublock to blow away:

      • the promoted inane shit
      • this fucker liked this inane thing
      • et al

      Use the picker to select the element for the promoted and step up until you find =“promoted” in the selector. This works for the other bullshit they try and shove down your throat and your feed will be 98% less shitty.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Good on ya. I think I would rather literally be hunted by dogs than engage with LinkedIn as a serious platform.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I just don’t scroll through the feed at all. I spend around 5 minutes on linkedin in a week just to check connection requests and that’s all my usage.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I can’t set foot in LinkedIn. By virtue of having been in tech since 1997, my direct relations include a lot of C level execs from recognizable names. All I get the moment I log in is spam from sales people, recruiters, hustlers, etc. It is just desperate in there.