supernova.place
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months ago

Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
28
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • brainworms@lemm.ee
387
external-link

Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places

apnews.com

AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months ago
message-square
28
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • brainworms@lemm.ee
Some Republican-led states say they they will block Justice Department’s election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities’ decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws.
  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    6 months ago

    Gee, that’s not suspicious at all…

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      6 months ago

      How the hell is this not “Roll up with the FBI/National Guard/Whoever and take the needed measures to get the DOJ observers into the polling station” level shenanigans?

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because democrats decided to go with a Republican AG to show that they’re not ‘weak on crime’.

      • three20three@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Since 1965, federal officials have sent about 32,000 observers to jurisdictions with histories of harassing minority voters or even outright denying them access to the ballot. But officials say their hands are now tied by a 2013 Supreme Court decision that gutted the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.As a result of that decision, in Shelby County v. Holder, the Justice Department will send observers only to jurisdictions where it already has court approval. That encompasses seven counties or jurisdictions in Alaska, California, Louisiana, and New York.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ah I read the article now. Seems there may be actual legal justification in at least some cases.

        • MacAttak8@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Isn’t the “legal justification” they used not including ‘Federal officers’ on their list of ‘category of persons’ allowed to be present during voting?

          So they intentionally passed an (illegal) law that forbids the DOJ from overseeing the election process because oopsey daisy we totally didn’t mean to write a law that breaks the law!

          But if you could honor our intentionally broken law while we’re committing the specific crimes you are here to prevent, that’d be super lawful of you.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well you see they have nothing to hide so they have nothing to inspect! The Republican states are just trying to save the Federal government money!

      /s but only slightly

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      On the contrary: they want you to think it’s suspicious because casting doubt on the election’s integrity is their goal. They want to manufacture justification for Trump’s lawsuits and coup attempts.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.54K users / day
  • 7.89K users / week
  • 13.5K users / month
  • 28.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 15.3K Posts
  • 282K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org