DytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前White House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square160linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldDytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square160linkfedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 年前Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·1 年前You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 年前Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 年前You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
lol