The emergence of social media has destroyed all the small communities to standardize communication and information.

It’s a bit of a digital version of rural exodus. And since 2017/2018, I’ve noticed that everything that, in my opinion, represented the internet has disappeared.

I’ve known Lemmy for a few hours and I feel like I’m back in the early spirit of the internet.

  • FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    The problem with centralized social media is it replaced all aspects of free speach and public opinion with algorithms that keep you hooked while all your personal information is being sold and given away. It doesn’t have to be that way. Learn about free software, what it means, it’s history, and it’s impact on the world today. Learn about the fediverse. Most importantly, don’t expect things to change if you don’t. https://www.fsf.org/about/what-is-free-software

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thanks to Lemmy and Linux I’ve been enjoying the internet in much the same way for some time now.

    I even use a desktop PC on a daily basis and it just feels right.

    Well, it’s desktop PC but I have the main monitor on an arm so that it can hover over my lap while on the couch. I’m a middle aged dad and my family likes to hang out in the same room together, so it is much more practically usable for me as a couchtop.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Not really, no. Social Medias can and will exist at any scale, some more or less harmful than others. For example, even Lemmy is filled with people spreading propaganda for foreign dictatorships.

    We should take the good with the bad and takes steps to protect our own rights and privacy while helping others do the same. Just as people did during the dawn of the internet, when scams we easily recognize today were unknown dangers before.

  • Binturong@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I do agree, but indirectly, cause social media isn’t inherently bad; It has been manipulated and exploited by oligarchs into weapons for information scraping and data theft. Zuck… Musk… Don’t let them slink away into the shadow and blame the tech. There was a time when social media was mostly enriching and had a potential for community building, and they took that from us to profit massively. The internet is dying, and it’s those psychotic freaks that have done it.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    YUP! This is exactly why I’m so passionate about it. Awfulness still happens, but it feels organic like the original days of the web.

  • Grofit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I feel like it’s a mix of quite a few things, social media is DEFINITELY a big part of the problem but the monetisation of EVERYTHING is the main problem.

    When the Internet was becoming more mainstream around the world (late 90s) most people who put content on there didn’t do it for money, they did it just to share knowledge/thoughts or just be part of a small niche community.

    This meant while there was less content it was more meaningful, and it got to the point quickly as it didn’t need to show you ads etc.

    Recipie sites show this perfectly, people used to just post family recipes in cooking forums, now it’s all personal blogs riddled with ads splattered between the person’s life story and multiple requests to subscribe to related guff.

    Ultimately the goal of the Internet shifted from “sharing knowledge/communicating” to “show as many ads as possible”. This makes 90% of each site filler to stop you getting to the 10% too quickly, so you get snagged on ads etc.

    This is why AI is great for companies, they can put in the important 10% and have it make up the 90%, but it’s just adding more noise to the Internet.

    Also pair this problem with search engines that now take advantage of the noise to provide “summary” blurbs which mean you don’t even visit the sites directly so they don’t get the revenue, the search engines do, I think there is a term for this “one click results” or something.

    Its such a shame, I loved the Internet from like 1995-2005, you could search for something and get really good information and facts on the subject quickly. Now the same sort of things are lost amongst the filler sites that just aggregate information and regurgitate it as their own, or just out uninformed opinions (maybe even AI results) as content as if it’s from experts etc.

    I could go on for ages on the subject as there are so many facets to the problem but I can’t see any real solutions, it’s just a midden heap.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      So I will preface my comment with the fact that I hate Internet ads and do everything within my power to block and/or avoid them. Aside from being annoying they’re a blatant security and malware risk, and I avoid them for that reason alone.

      That being said, hosting websites gets pretty expensive pretty fast when lots of people come to your site, especially with the advent of much higher bandwidth media that goes along with better quality images and video.

      In my opinion the fact that the majority of people just have an expectation that everything online should be free is THE problem. I was there when the Internet was free and open and without ads. That was the culture, and the root of the issue we have today is that that culture is the foundation of the general expectation that it should continue to be so.

      But that’s not sustainable with the costs involved in hosting today. Shit costs money yo, why should other people bear that so you can search for recipes for free without it being annoying for you?

      The fact that nobody is willing to pay for content via subscriptions or paid apps is literally why the ad-based model is the overwhelming majority of the Internet, and apps, and why data collection/sales is so rampant.

      Web development and running a webpage is not easy. Even for those that are skilled enough that it’s easy for them, it takes a ton of time. Usually multiple people’s time for any site with enough visitors to make it a good site. App development is hard and takes a skill set that requires a lot of training or time investment to learn. Why should all that go for free for you?

      Until people are willing to pay for content they find valuable the Internet will be a hell hole ridden with ads. YouTube ads are awful, but do you have any idea how much it costs to run YouTube? You think someone should just absorb that out of the goodness of their hearts? Ridiculous.

      The goal of the Internet is still to share information and communicate, but all the hardware and bandwidth and time costs real dollars, and the only way for most sites to recoup that is via ads because people just won’t pay anything if given an option, they’ll just go to another site that has free content, because there’s SO MUCH stuff that you can generally find what you want, for free with ads, somewhere else.

      There’s only two possible solutions that I see:

      1. everyone starts being willing to pay for content they find valuable. I don’t see this happening. There’s too many people that share your opinion without taking into account what it costs to actually run a modern website.

      2. some complicated type of system that directly pays websites for use, based off of usage from people. I think this is almost too complicated to implement that it’s likely impossible with today’s Internet. If we want to also maintain privacy/anonymity when surfing I can’t see how this can ever work - so unless we have some future system where people are uniquely identifiable on the Internet, and then some additional system that somehow “fairly” compensates websites for traffic from users, this won’t happen. It would need to involve ISPs, their customers, and web site owners in some coordinated payment system to work.

      Not to sound too preachy but to me your comment comes off as super entitled.

      I pay for apps that I think are valuable, even ones with no cost like Signal. Because I value what they provide. I subscribe to sites that I find valuable enough to do so when it’s an option. I abhor data collection and ads and I fight them without prejudice. But even I don’t think I pay enough directly to offset how much I cost providers, I’m sure I don’t, but that’s mostly laziness because it’s a pain to pay every site directly so I donate to the ones I really appreciate and use heavily. If I could pay my ISP for my link and then have a direct credit system that throws dollars and cents directly into website coffers as I use them, that would be great - but I don’t want to give up my privacy either, so… Yeah.

      Long story short, ad-based content is going nowhere until there’s a fundamental shift in either people or how the Internet operates.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You’re not alone at all. The old Internet died the day Facebook became the dominant social media app and gave the corpo their first real foothold into the digital sphere since the Dot Com Bust. It’s not a space for free expression and information sharing anymore. Now it’s all fucking ads, slop, and grifting.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Depends what communities you frequent, I think. I’m still drinking from the “all/hot” firehose presently, but I see myself spending more time in the smaller communities as lemmy overall get bigger and more mainstream.

  • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Social media is the front of the house.

    What destroyed the internet are the cabal of Corporations monetizing every interaction and directing flows from the back of the house.

    Unfettered Capitalism killed the internet experience.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Yup. It discouraged people from being anonymous and made stupid website accounts be extremely valuable to people.

    So it’s not about having a conversation with people it’s about saying the right things so your account becomes more popular. You don’t want to change your opinion on anything because people are following your account because they liked the thing you’ve said in the past. A stupid website account is a major part of your identity and your past opinions are also part of your identity.

    So something that might’ve been just some weird phase in a small part of your life becomes a calcified part of your identity. The stupid shit you said in the past is part of who you are forever.

    There’s pressure to get out your opinion to get out your “hot take” before everyone else, so that you’ll get all of the attention instead of someone else who got their hot take before you did. Hot takes are obviously going to be poorly thought out and people in a rush to get them out are easily manipulated. Then they get calcified and it results in people on willing to die on some dumb hill.

    Because of all of this, people got dumbed done to the point where social media is basically just prison rules now. Gotta join some gang to survive, the gangs are determined by ethno-religious identity and survival is all about making your gang stronger than the other gangs. It would be funny if this nonsense didn’t leak into reality, but since a lot of people’s social media identity is a major part of their real life identity, all of the internet nonsense impacts the real world.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The feeling you’re talking about pretty much always happens when you find a small community. Like when you move to a small town and life just somehow feels more personal. Those are still around, they just aren’t well known (but they never really were). I mean it’s like there are a lot of very large cities today but small towns are still there too.

  • happydoors@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I just gotta say, I felt that switch too around that time. 2016-2019ish. Something about how Instagram moved away from encouraging posts of your life to family//friends for pushing an influencer/celebrity sphere. People stopped sharing their lives, ordinary content wasn’t ranked as high. And then the other social platforms copied it

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it’s way earlier than that. Early Facebook was horrible. But everyone bought into it.

      • happydoors@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The early years of Facebook as a teenager were great for me! No advertisements, just friends and friends of friends posting updates about their thoughts, activities, and photos. Somewhere in my college years (2011-15) it definitely got worse but not to a degree I’d call ‘bad’. Not disagreeing or anything, just sharing!