• WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I feel like I’m too autistic for this shit. I’m an engineer and just send out the bullet points. Why are we wasting everyone’s time with this overly verbose garbage? What happened to celebrating brevity? Just give us the 24 hr work week and give up this farce.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The joke is that the ten bullet points at the end are completely different from the ten bullet points that started it all.

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That sounds racist… right?

        Time to think of a new name? Like we dont call Brazilian nuts by their “other” name anymore.

        • RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          That’s not really a fair comparison, because “Chinese” is not a slur; it’s the preferred adjective (just like “Brazilian”).

          I do think it’s a bit racist though, because it specifically exoticizes/others Chinese people/things.

          I once knew a Mexican girl who went by “China” (“Chinese” in Spanish) because she was born with blonde hair, which makes no sense except that “Chinese” is used as a synonym for “weird”.

        • StillAlive@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’ve always seen it referred as ‘Chinese Whispers’.

          Before that it was called ‘Russian Gossip’.

  • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A good report should start with an executive summary, so executives don’t have to read the full report, yet pretend they have all the info they need to make decisions.

    If we make our own tldr, we can steer executives in the direction we want, while still providing real info to other technical people.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Everyone boosting AI use acts like it’s this little secret that only they know about.

    • emb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yep. I think about it like having a time machine that could go back and change the future, or a printer that outputs perfect money dollars. Would be super useful, but only if somehow you alone, no one else, had the same technology. If everyone has it, it’s just chaos and everything sucks.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I use AI everyday for software development. It’s soul sucking and saps any satisfaction from completing anything but you can’t put the genie back in the lamp so here we are.

      I have had multiple discussions with non technical people who are on both sides of this image. They sit there talking about how it makes it easier to do the various parts of their job without irony. I just blink back thinking “you are describing a meat proxy”. If you are just copy pasting emails from one UI to another why do they need you?

      The anti AI people like to pretend that it’s ineffective but there are a large number of people in the middle of the org chart whose job is basically summarizing PowerPoints from below and then pass up. AI can definitely do that and even if it’s inefficient it’s fast and doesn’t need benefits and healthcare.

      Those people are going to get fucked.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are job “cheats” that are efficient - ways to save time that don’t affect work product.

      And then there are “cheats” that just push the work to someone else, because some people will gladly save five minutes for themselves even if it creates an hour of work for someone else.

      So yes, the latter people are the ones driving workplace AI adoption, as their “little productivity secret.”