• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah, but they didn’t have a 24/7 propaganda network pipe it directly into my brain, so its their fault.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        20 days ago

        Um, yes.

        Democratic media strategies haven’t changed since the 90s, and that’s a problem. Also, Trump did the independent media circuit and Kamala just didn’t. In the few sit down interviews Kamala did, her top priority was message discipline, not connecting with voters. Every answer sounded like a stump speech. For all of Trump’s lack of humanity, he came off as far more relatable than Kamala.

        The entire campaign model used by the Democrats needs to be shredded. The consultants that have failed over and over and over need to be gone. Democrats need to deliver better for the working class, and they have to get much better at bragging about it. They can’t continue to dull their message so as not to offend wealthy donors.

        Voters need a narrative, and narratives need an enemy. Republicans have no problem finding an enemy, they just pick a disadvantaged group and go at it. Democrats must take on the corporate and wealthy interests that are legitimately keeping workers down, and they must do it loudly. That’s the only narrative available to them. The strategy of beating up the targets the Republicans chose, but not as much, is a total loser.

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      20 days ago

      Lmao this is like raising prices in october to ‘slash’ them for black friday sales. “Hey everybody, remember last month when grocery prices got up to 3 times as high as when i took office? I had some really good phone calls with my corporate donors and we agreed that itd be a good pr move if we could announce theyre going back ‘down’ to 2.75x as much!”

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        not even close, that’s all completely off the mark.

        a literal global pandemic happened, and US food production companies were found responsible for price gouging simply for profit because they thought everyone would be too distracted by dying from the pandemic.

        you combine price gouging, which Biden publicly exposed and told the worst companies to stop doing, and they did revert prices, in with shrinkflation, which Biden set up a regulatory committee specifically to combat, with Russia’s War driving up energy prices, and Biden still was able to bring down inflation within a couple years to normal enough levels that the treasury stopped raising interest rates. he brought it down from 14% to about 2.

        Yes, it is good that Biden was able to lower grocery prices and gas prices.

        you wanted lower prices. Biden gave you lower prices.

        Biden doesn’t set grocery or energy prices, but he can bring them down as much as possible despite a service industry attacked by Trump, a pandemic killing and isolating the work force attacked and dismantled by Trump, and an aggressive War from a leading energy producer that will lead to more wars and higher prices with the support Trump has pledged to Putin.

        Trump raised prices.

        Biden brought the prices back down.

        have fun with your reelected markups.

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Exactly, US food companies were found guilty of price gouging, and instead of regulating prices or introducing any legal consequences whatsoever, Biden wagged his finger and supposedly said “Hey jack, dont fuck people over quite as much” and so prices didnt go back down to what they should be, or what they had been, they went down a barely noticeable percentage from a ridiculous all time high. Also what you people dont seen to ever understand, someone criticizing biden is NOT automatically defending trump, or saying hed do better. Theyre saying in the eyes of most people, Biden did fuck all and it wasnt enough (clearly). But keep licking the old mans boots because that worked super well last election. You can blame everyone else but i blame you dumbass die hard democrat party/ biden defenders who think they can do no wrong.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            “instead of regulating prices”

            literally what they’re trying to regulate with the legislation he introduced

            you can’t just regulate private companies for no reason.

            "Biden wagged his finger and supposedly said “Hey jack, dont fuck people over quite as much” and’

            and it worked and the prices went down.

            Love that you used "hey Jack"by the way, I’ve been really getting into that lately.

            "percentage from a ridiculous all time high.’

            ehgs down from $4 to less than $1 because of a study done that show their price gouging…so… that significant well then

            “someone criticizing biden is NOT automatically defending trump”

            couldn’t care less about this tangent.

            and then it looks like you’re just making shit up after that because you don’t have any evidence, facts or logic to draw on.

            worrrd

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      21 days ago

      Corporations: Here’s a press release saying we intend to lower prices.

      Biden: I’m gonna take credit for their PR move.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        what are you talking about?

        Biden released a billion barrels of gas and gas prices went down.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          I mean, in the link Biden was taking credit for corporations’ press releases about not gouging prices as severely as they had been for the previous three years when Biden just sat back and watched.

          The record oil production that he’s so proud of regardless of price is a different thing entirely.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            where?

            You’re saying that Biden was taking credit for the corporations lowering the price of gas, while what happened was that Biden released a billion barrel of oil and then gas prices went down.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              21 days ago

              You’re saying that Biden was taking credit for the corporations lowering the price of gas

              No, that’s not what I’m saying. Did you even read the headline of the link you posted? I was talking about the content of the link you posted, which doesn’t even mention gasoline.

              You either didn’t read what you linked to, or you have decided that you want to lie about me and my position. And since we’ve talked before, I’m not going to make the mistake of giving you the benefit of the doubt again. You lied about my position, and since I replied to your diversion about gas prices, you’re going to continue lying and pretending that I was always talking about gas prices.

              No. Go pull this shit on someone else.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  Thank you for confirming that my decision to not give you the benefit of the doubt was correct.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    21 days ago

    gas is a commodity, it’s price is based on opec oil production, whether we get oil from them or not, along with global demand, the seasons and severity of winters around the world, political bullshit on the other side of the world, and corporate greed.

    if you want to lay blame on high prices in the u.s., blame yourselves first for your addiction to large, gas-guzzling vehicles (among other things)… then blame the oil companies, who produce more now than ever before and choose to export at higher prices than they can sell domestically (the u.s. actually exports more than we import).

    egg prices have been affected by infected farms and loss of production, and compounded by corporate greed eyeballing opportunities to artificially inflate, and hold high, prices; and they’d rather write-off a culling than spend a dime on preventive measures such as lower density farms or vaccinations (you know how well that would play out with our far-right dominated media these days).

    neither can really be controlled by congress or the president. neither is the democrat’s fault. neither is biden or harris’ fault.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      blame yourselves first for your addiction to large, gas-guzzling vehicles

      nah blame the lobbying and abuse of regulations that maintains the status quo of car-reliant infrastructure

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        21 days ago

        if you didn’t demand the giant trucks and weren’t willing to pay giant premium prices for them; manufacturers wouldn’t have the profit-driven motives to make them, focus almost exclusively on them, and cut production and selection of smaller and more affordable vehicles to ‘make room’ for them in the market.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          There are legit regulatory issues that strongly incentivize manufactures to sell giant vehicles. Fuel efficiency standards for larger vehicles are a lot easier to meet. A lot of the demand for larger vehicles is driven by advertising.

          Of course people could stop letting corporations drag them around by the nose, but it seems like most of the public still likes it that way.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            21 days ago

            Just to back you up, the regulations you are primarily speaking to are the CAFE standards. While the intent of CAFE standards is to reduce overall emissions and improve energy efficiency, the footprint-based model has led to a proliferation of less efficient, heavier vehicles that contribute to climate change and air pollution.

            This was predicted back in 2011, before the standards were even active and it kind of played out exactly as they guessed.

    • veroxii@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      I had this exact conversation several times with Americans while travelling for work in the USA.

      Oil prices are up around the world and USA gas prices are actually really cheap compared to everywhere else.

      In fact everything is pretty cheap compared to Europe and Australia.

      But all they do is whinge and moan and blame Biden.

      They have no friggen idea there’s a whole wide world out there.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        To be fair, you are probably not taking into account all the things Americans have to spend money on that are government services elsewhere. Healthcare alone takes a large chunk of American income. By the time people are spending money on groceries, there is often little or no money left.

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I take your point but this was not the case for these people I was talking to. I pay their salaries and health insurance and they still take home 6 figures a year after all deductions.

          Then they sit there complaining about gas prices and how Biden is running their lives when it’s a worldwide thing and they have it better than 99% of the rest of humanity. Biden can’t do shit about world wide issues.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        The other day a guy i met from the D.C. area told me that low quality coffee costs 20$ a bag. Fucking pregrinded coffee for the filter machine. You can get the luxury beans for that money in Europe.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          That’s also completely untrue lol that guy is either lying or buying a huge bag of the expensive shit

        • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Maybe at a more expensive convenience store, or he’s like many idiots that shop somewhere like Whole Foods and because they’re used to seeing some $70/bag organic free-range non-GMO gluten-free coffee grown in the Himalayas by a small sect of previously uncontacted monks, the “cheap stuff” is the $20 bag of stuff that’s similarly overpriced.

          The most I’ve ever paid for coffee in the US was $20/lb at a local artisan roaster, where they’re blended and roasted right in the store. Usually my normal coffee is about $3-5/lb

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            The guy is from an immigrant family, and his parents until recently worked minimum wage. It is just that the cost of living in Washington D.C. got this outrageous.

            • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Then sadly, knowing how a lot of my friends shopped when they were broke, I bet that it is something like a convenience store. Not saying that DC isn’t expensive, I was literally just there visiting a friend who lives there, but I also live in an area with a CoL well above the national average and coffee still isn’t $20 for cheap pre-ground stuff

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Doesn’t matter. You’re right, but being right doesn’t win elections.

      The GOP claims they can fix it and that’s all people hear and care about.

      It’s fucked up and sad, but true.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      neither can really be controlled by congress or the president. neither is the democrat’s fault. neither is biden or harris’ fault.

      False. just straight up false. you literally straight up mentioned things to address some of the problems in your post. But besides that congress absolutely can pass laws that penalize companies for profiteering and then enforce them.

      Pass a law making CEO/board members personally liable w/ jail time for a company’s profiteering on food prices and watch what happens at even the wiff of a federal investigation.

      Now tell me how many democrats supported bernie’s windfall bill?

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        How exactly do you make raising profit margins illegal? You can do it for natural disasters and such, but companies raising prices when the market allows is just what all companies do all the time.

        The government is capable of addressing these issues, but not by making profiteering illegal. They need to break up monopolies, vertical integration, and certain trade associations. They also need to address short term performance pay for CEOs. Any performance pay should be tied to company performance over at least the next ten years, not this quarter.

    • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Americans aren’t educated enough to know the difference, so without more clever messaging, all these facts are written off as “educated people trying to show they are more superior than us”.

      Politics is a show of messagimg and failed promises and Dem’s consultants and marketeers failed miserably at this.

  • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    Hey look, another person getting the turnout question completely fucking wrong.

    1. Relative to 2020, turnout was UP in swing states.

    2. Trump led irregular/independant/politically disinterested voters by double digits.

    A 100% turnout would not only not have changed the result, but probably would have produced an even larger Trump victory.

    • Che Banana@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      And also avoiding the fact they were rolling support behind the literal walking corpse of the status quo while people were demanding the status quo change.

      The Democrats have become the party of complicity (good cop) while the Republicans move the agenda to where the government/those in power want it to be (bad cop).

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        The Democrats have become the party of complicity (good cop) while the Republicans move the agenda to where the government/those in power want it to be (bad cop).

        This is false equivalency in sheep’s clothing

        • Che Banana@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          Then why is it there is always just 1 republican holding up the works whenever they want? Tommy Rubber I’ll the great Traitor from Alafuckintbama held up how many promotions for the US military while the Party of Complicity sat on their hands and cliñutched pearls.

          I am so absolutely tired of the Dems getting steamrolled by another party that holds nobody accountable and passes their policies with impunity…all while the Dems ‘take the high road’.

          Now, it’s too late, and they will play the part of the injured lamb until all their progressive programs are gutted.

          Throw your pop culture phrases in the toilet along with your social security, because that’s gonna go too.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Bitching that both parties are bad doesn’t solve anything. It’s just demotivates the rest of the public from actually exercising the one power they have: voting.

            Of course, none of this even matters, considering the public have already spoken and they want corpo-facism.

            • Che Banana@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              It’s not a both sides argument, really, when one is absolutely horrible and the only party that has the power to stop their bullshit does nothing but move their agenda to the right in the hopes of converting voters.

              Ranked choice voting and the breakup of the 2 party system which only benefits the American oligarchy is the only way forward.

              • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                Ranked choice voting and the breakup of the 2 party system which only benefits the American oligarchy is the only way forward.

                That’s a pretty unreasonable goal, considering that would require a 2/3rds majority and agreement on both parties that they want to gut their own system.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago
    • Democrats Won Highly Engaged Voters: In the 2024 presidential election, Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party successfully retained support from frequent and highly engaged voters. However, they struggled to connect with less-engaged voters, where Donald Trump held a significant lead[1].

    • Democratic Assumptions Challenged: The election results challenged several Democratic assumptions, such as the belief that increased voter turnout favors them. In 2024, Republicans benefited from mobilizing less-engaged voters[2].

    • Demographic Shifts: Democrats faced difficulties with working-class and non-college-educated voters, while Trump expanded his support among these groups and in urban areas[2][3].

    Citations: [1] Democrats won ‘highly engaged’ voters and struggled with everyone else in 2024 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/democrats-won-highly-engaged-voters-struggled-everyone-else-2024-rcna179957 [2] 5 Democratic assumptions shattered by the 2024 election: From the Politics Desk https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/democratic-assumptions-shattered-2024-election-politics-desk-rcna181725 [3] What Voters Told Democrats in 2024 https://www.thirdway.org/memo/what-voters-told-democrats-in-2024

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      retained support from frequent and highly engaged voters. However, they struggled to connect with less-engaged voters

      I like all these fancy ways we come up with to say that stupid ignorant people voted Republican.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        yeah. Clearly they are all just stupid and ignorant. Has nothing to do with the working class having their ability to engage in politics obstructed and being abandonded by the Dems and lied to by the Reps.

        No everyone who isnt voting against their class interests for my class interests is just stupid and ignorant…

        • Skeezix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          You’re giving them too much credit. Ignorance is in vogue. Most of the people voting for Trump couldn’t point to Maine on a map. Voting against your own best interests is quite stupid.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      And more importantly, Dick Cheney! Republicans voted for them in droves and Democrats didn’t stay home in disgust!

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Got to love the irony of anti-regulation Republicans winning an election by complaining that Democrats aren’t implementing enough regulations

    Republicans: Vote for us if you agree that unregulated capitalism is destroying America!

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    The average shmoe doesn’t give a f if the stock market is doing well if the groceries are high. Democrats could have addressed this asap and would have been better off come November. But anytime I said that I got yelled at how the economy is doing good…oh well, enjoy the fascism.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    In comparator say that because they don’t want to admit that democratic party is extremely shitty and not serving the people it was designed too.

    It’s no surprise that these useless Talking Heads are lying out their ass just to try to save their jobs.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 days ago

      In comparator say that because they don’t want to admit that democratic party is extremely shitty and not serving the people it was designed too.

      It’s serving the people it was designed to. But not the ones it claims to.

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’m left leaning and can’t stand the current democratic party. I’m never voting republican, but after the bernie bullshit to ram clinton in i’m under no illusion that the democrat party is for the people by any stretch. In another timeline where he was elected instead of trump we might have had some amazing outcomes from the pandemic. A real populist that seems to be anything but the corrupt status quo might have put politics on a more enlighened, less sensational smoke and mirrors path.

  • detectivemittens@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    I call bullshit on this narrative when the other side of the equation is the guy screaming about tariffs on our largest trade partners.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      The other guy is fucking insane and his voters like it. Those people were never going to vote anything other than Republican and it makes no sense to bring them up in a conversation about Democrat failures.

      • whithom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        The new trend will be to focus on how the democrats failed. It’s a tactic. Redirecting anger, and the media, to the wrong thing so that the real problem groups operate unnoticed.

        Remember how lemmy was ablaze with “Genocide Joe?” Keep an eye on the ML and hexbears, as the usually ride the maga train.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Remember how lemmy was ablaze with “Genocide Joe?”

          I mean people don’t hate him any less for it; it just lost relevance because he stepped down as the presidential nominee.

        • detectivemittens@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’ll definitely be a pivot to how the Democrats failed and how everything is their fault when the tariffs kick in and the price of everything skyrockets.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      It helps when the people don’t know what a tariff is so they can literally just lie about they will do.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Price of gas is high now? I hadn’t heard that complaint and the price has been going down.

    Sure enough, I see a spike two years ago when the sanctions hit after Russia invaded Ukraine but it quickly got back to near normal and stayed that way or trended down. I guess the new plateaus is higher than four years ago but not by much, not recently, nor is there an upward trend.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    20 days ago

    Petroleum and animal products should both be expensive. Stop fucking killing me and the individuals I love.

    • Garibaldee@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      I agree, but that’s a different issue than changing people’s consumption. Ignoring that things people consume have increased in price and not doing anything about it is effectively just a lower standard of living. It would be received very poorly if any political party tried to get rid of subsidies for fuel/animal products, you would need levels of state control comparable to the Soviet Union or another socialist country to get people to change their consumption to that degree. In capitalism consumption is many people’s primary identity and it would take a lot of deprogramming to change that. This is to an extent going on and many climate groups are doing a good job getting people more comfortable with the idea of veganism/shifting away from fossil fuels, but saying you have less money in your bank account and that’s a good thing because maybe you’ll change your habits to avoid climate change would have resulted in a 50 state blow out, you will never get people on your side operating like that.