supernova.place
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nipawomset@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago

Sean Connery in 1964 (on the set of Goldfinger) and Thomas Brodie-Sangster in 2024. Both age 34 in their respective photos.

lemmy.world

message-square
150
link
fedilink
502

Sean Connery in 1964 (on the set of Goldfinger) and Thomas Brodie-Sangster in 2024. Both age 34 in their respective photos.

lemmy.world

nipawomset@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
150
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • joeschmoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Idk man, I’ve always looked way younger than my age when shaved, but not that extreme. Skin care or not, I would not want to look like that at 34.

  • thecryptickler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Part of it, I’m sure, is that Thomas has babyface. Part of it, too, is that people don’t smoke cigarettes, or drink as much as they used to, or generally live as hard of lives. Living through the 2000s, for example, isn’t really as complicated perhaps, or troubling, as living through the Great Depression and World War II and the Cold War.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That’s Pierce Brosnan, famous for his role as Mister Doubtfire and the voice of Genie in Aladdin

    • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        She’s a lot less blue than I remember, but that’s her.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Smoking, alcohol, no sunscreen will still age up a person of today by 10 years.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think also one of them probably had an easier path:

      Sean Connery’s father was Joseph Connery, a factory worker and lorry driver.

      Thomas Brodie-Sangster was the actor and performer, Mark Sangster.

    • federalofph@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Removed by mod

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some people used to be born old. That’s just how the world worked. Also, stupid fashion. Have you seen a photo of a woman college student in the 80s? They look 40.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah just drugs/drinking/smoking. He has admitted he started smoking at 9

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Those huge glasses that were in vogue in the 80’s did no one any favors.

    • federalofph@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Removed by mod

  • iuseasahibtw@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Thomas is like a genetically engineered femboy for Hollywood billionaires.

    No need to go out and molest nubile young boys in the Caribbean, this bad boy is of legal age and doesn’t look a day past 15.

    Like a human version of a toy dog, but with a genetically superior bussy.

    • federalofph@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Removed by mod

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow they look like two completely different people

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Crazy how nature do that.

      • hypeerror@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re different people? I thought that was just angle and lighting.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      But, you can only tell that because one used sunscreen, and one didn’t. Otherwise they’d look exactly identical. /s

      • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What if James Bond did a pdrn mask every time he was supposed to drink and smoke and every time he was supposed have a villain try to torture him he got HIFU instead?

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    These pictures are due to two things; genetics and lighting. Even though dude on right looks younger generally, if he was photographed in the same light as Connery they would look much closer in age.

    • Hildegard (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can see the shadow on the wall behind him. There is a light below his eyeline. That’s called a beauty light, and it hides wrinkles by lighting the areas that would be in shadow from lights above.

      But smoking also has a lot to do with it.

      • federalofph@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Removed by mod

    • federalofph@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Removed by mod

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The difference is 1 part genetics, 1 part skin care routines, 1 part sun protection habits, 7 parts a lifetime with or without smoking and being surrounded by people smoking at nearly all times.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      You forgot “1 part warlock’s curse”

      I mean, the boy man literally looks 13!

      It’s like Stephen King’s Thinner, but with visual age rather than weight.

      • Cordinel@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Its the angle and lightning. If you look up other pictures of him he looks more like an actual adult. Still way younger looking than Sean of course.

      • 0ops@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was gonna say, Thomas definitely looks younger here than Sean looks older

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        “White boy from town, why you no eat you own baby food?”

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sean Connery also wore a toupée ever since he was in his 20s. Dude went bald early and hid it from the world until he was an old man.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder if it is also differing beauty standards. Older men used to be considered more sexy. Nowadays a guy over 40 is basically a corpse but if you watch old movies you’ll see guys who look 50 or even 60 in hero roles, and they get the girl, too.

      So what I’m saying is, Sean Connery might never be chosen as a leading actor today because he looks too old.

      • we is doomed!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Older men used to be considered more sexy. Nowadays a guy over 40 is basically a corpse

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know 50+ year old men who get plenty, and look pretty hot. The key, besides genetics, seems to be both not smoking and doing enough sports.

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure but you can’t name many movies where a guy over 50 gets plenty. We all know that media beauty standards don’t hold up the same in reality. Large ladies getting plenty of action in reality being the most obvious example.

        • federalofph@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Removed by mod

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ouch!

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Don’t worry, I feel your pain. Just wait until the day a beautiful women says you’re like an uncle to her.

    • LiarAmongAll@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Idk, I’ve been around and been a smoker a large portion of life, I look like I’m a young 25 still despite being 35 (it ain’t me saying, I just got a young face). Some people just look younger for longer.

      I don’t feel 25, my body hates what I’ve done to it 😂

      • federalofph@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Removed by mod

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s also nose and ear size, jawline, and lighting. Although it’s possible that’s already a toupee on Sean.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Neat, not a shitpost.

    • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah not even a speck of visible feces like wth‽!

    • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m so deeply offended by this post not meeting my exacting criteria for what a shit post is. How could OP not have consulted me? Me! The arbiter of all that is true and good on the Internet. Shame on your house, OP! You will be Blood Eagled by a team of dachshund ninjas for this transgression!

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No need to get offended about it bud, they just posted to the wrong comm is all!

  • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s funny that culturally 34 was considered a middle aged man back then whereas 34 today feels like an old 20 something.

    • VeganBtw@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      You made my entire week and added spring in my step, I just hope it won’t ruin my knees.

      • TheArtfulLlama@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah you’ll just throw your back out instead

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          My back’s been at leat some level of thrown out for the last 15 years.

      • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        What knees? Your bones are gone, dumb vegoon. They evaporated the moment you stopped consuming animals.

        -Signed a dog meat lover

        • VeganBtw@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I love that website, exactly my style!

        • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hahaha wtf is this‽

          • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Something to hopefully make people think about cognitive dissonance and consider how they could change.

            • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah I had not scrolled far enough. Now it makes sense. And I’m hungry now. Anyone got dog?

        • canaryWart@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Address not found

          • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It loads for me on multiple browsers, on multiple VPN locations.

            Is there literally just no preview link for you? Or does it fail in the browser?

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Re: the other comment, isn’t it weird how people just come up to you on the internet, and say, “hey, I’m an asshole, block me!” That’s weird.

        • VeganBtw@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you are refering to the dog meat lover, it’s actually a vegan satire site!

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh! Welp

            • M137@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              🤦‍♂️

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      And the 20 y/o’s feel like babies. I see dudes get weird with the younger nursing assistants sometimes and get a tiny reflexive EXCUSE YOU…???

  • Ariselas@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sean is always cool, but I wonder how Thomas would look had he been smoking a pack a day for 20 years too.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is this really it? I thought the non smoking would be compensated by the increased pollution of everything

      • Ariselas@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m sure sun exposure also plays a role, everyone wears SPF 8000 sunblock now, while they were putting on tanning oil back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s

        • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Really? I thought sunblock was pretty over the top in Connery’s day.

          An image of a woman coated in gold from the James Bond film Goldfinger, which starred Connery as Bond

          • Ariselas@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            now that’s a golden tan!

        • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          3 days ago

          • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’ll buy that for a dollar!

            • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              3 days ago

              Calm down, Captain Kirk

      • undree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        3 days ago

        Air pollution was worse in the last century https://ourworldindata.org/outdoor-air-pollution

        • Eq0@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thanks for the informative response. I’m a bit confused by the graphs given, that track emissions and not air quality itself. Would you know why?

          • EnsignRoApologist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            AQI is highly variable by locale and hour. It averages out in the end, but measuring regional and global emissions is a better way to compare disparate time periods, except for areas at the extremes.

            • Eq0@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I would expect emissions to cumulatively impact air quality, is that not the case?

              • Hoimo@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                To begin, it does accumulate in the region where it is created, but of course it diffuses over time, so 10 pollution could be 7 locally and 3 globally. The heavy elements (soot) never get very far and naturally fall out of the air. Some elements are broken down by sunlight. Some bind to rain and are washed into the ground. If pollution is constant, you reach an equilibrium in the air quality. Decreasing output slowly lowers that equilibrium and improves the air quality in the end.

                • Eq0@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Thanks, that’s very informative!

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pollution was worse back then, look up smog in the 70s. We’ve introduced catalytic converters, emissions standards, etc. Most people now question why we need clean air laws because we have clean air, much like people thinking we don’t need vaccines because those diseases aren’t around.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Air_Act_(United_States)

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which is funny because those diseases are still around since they flare up when people stop taking vaccines.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s significantly less air and water pollution now than the past, with the only exception being microplastics. We haven’t found many short-term impacts from that yet, though

        • we is doomed!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/07/un-expert-human-rights-climate-crisis-economy

          An estimated 7 million people worldwide die prematurely from air pollution each year.

          In his final interview before handing over the special rapporteur mandate, Boyd said he struggles to makes sense of the world’s collective indifference to the suffering being caused by preventable environmental harms.

          I can’t get people to bat an eyelash. It’s like there’s something wrong with our brains that we can’t understand just how grave this situation is.”

        • Eq0@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was thinking of PFAS, pesticides, ultra-processed food and such

          • StellarExtract@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            Considering back then they had asbestos, lead, etc, we’re still a lot better off now, I think. A lot of our stuff now is “this increases risk” whreas a lot of stuff then was “this causes literal organ failure”.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pollution was probably another contributing factor; I’d be surprised if it wasn’t a lot worse in the 60s than it is now: a lot of environmental controls got put in place in the intervening decades. Remember, there was leaded gasoline everywhere, and acid rain scares and the ozone layer depletion in the 80s.

      • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Connery also grew in the wake of WW2, that kind of stress ages you early

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a combination of many factors over time. Diet, sun exposure, smoking. Lots of things we have more information about now than we did then. Medicine is better, genetics, etc.

      • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh ya, because removing lead from the air made it so much worse. /s

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This can’t be real…jesus

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 days ago

    The one on the right is also married to Elon Musk’s twice divorce ex-wife. As in the wife married Elon, divorced him, married Elon again, divorced him, then marred the guy on the right.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      What did she mar him with, some sort of edged weapon?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        If only!

    • ATPA9@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wait, WHO married this cringelord twice??

      • kantor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Divorce benefits, dude, think about it

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talulah_Riley

        • Čauky Mňauky@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Geez, she looks slick. 😻

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fuck? I really liked this actor before but now I just feel gross.

    • MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s determined like his character in Love Actually.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here his is in dr no a year later looking more like he’s 40 instead of 55, given he’s in makup, but the crows-feet smile lines aren’t doing him any favors.

    and here he is 7 years later in 71 (41 years old) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Connery#/media/File:Sean_Connery_as_James_Bond_(1971).jpg

    TBH, the effect on skin from smoking seem to hit like a truck in the 40’s, that’s gotta be severe tanning, smoking and some really rough genetics.

    • Colalextrast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      He would have been early 30s in Dr No, it was released two years before Goldfinch. Still, though, it’s crazy how much the lifestyles of previous generations differ from current lifestyles and how you can literally read it on people’s faces.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Goldfinch

        goooooldddFINCHAAAAA… .the bird with the MIDAS TOUCH! Such a coooold finchaahhh

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And crazy enough, He grew up in Scottland, That puts you on the less likely end of the scale to grow up with too much sun :)

Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world

lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

…


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

…


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

…


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

…


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

…


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

…

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.79K users / day
  • 9.07K users / week
  • 14.5K users / month
  • 27.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 42.5K subscribers
  • 31.1K Posts
  • 725K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Aer@lemmy.world
  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org