The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on unjustified U.S. tariffs against Canada:

“Today, after a 30-day pause, the United States administration has decided to proceed with imposing 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian exports and 10 per cent tariffs on Canadian energy. Let me be unequivocally clear – there is no justification for these actions.

“While less than 1 per cent of the fentanyl intercepted at the U.S. border comes from Canada, we have worked relentlessly to address this scourge that affects Canadians and Americans alike. We implemented a $1.3 billion border plan with new choppers, boots on the ground, more co-ordination, and increased resources to stop the flow of fentanyl. We appointed a Fentanyl Czar, listed transnational criminal cartels as terrorist organizations, launched the Joint Operational Intelligence Cell, and are establishing a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force on organized crime. Because of this work – in partnership with the United States – fentanyl seizures from Canada have dropped 97 per cent between December 2024 and January 2025 to a near-zero low of 0.03 pounds seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

“Canada will not let this unjustified decision go unanswered. Should American tariffs come into effect tonight, Canada will, effective 12:01 a.m. EST tomorrow, respond with 25 per cent tariffs against $155 billion of American goods – starting with tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods immediately, and tariffs on the remaining $125 billion on American products in 21 days’ time. Our tariffs will remain in place until the U.S. trade action is withdrawn, and should U.S. tariffs not cease, we are in active and ongoing discussions with provinces and territories to pursue several non-tariff measures. While we urge the U.S. administration to reconsider their tariffs, Canada remains firm in standing up for our economy, our jobs, our workers, and for a fair deal.

“Because of the tariffs imposed by the U.S., Americans will pay more for groceries, gas, and cars, and potentially lose thousands of jobs. Tariffs will disrupt an incredibly successful trading relationship. They will violate the very trade agreement that was negotiated by President Trump in his last term.”

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Even when these tarrifs are gone, Canada, Europe and Mexico should continue to move away from the US economy as the US has shown time and again that it’s current political system is so horrendously corrupt that it can’t be trusted as a partner.

    Do NOT buy US built weapons anymore either as there is an actual non zero chance you’ll have to use these weapons against the US. Especially the more advanced weapons like the F35, which is already a shit bucket on its own, pose a huge risk as you can rest assured knowing that the US has a kill switch for these when needed.

    Until the US completely rebuilds it political system from the ground up, new constitution and all, it should be ignored and left out of the sandbox where the rest of the world is pkaying

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The kill switch is maintenance. Parts and supply are the constraints. In a way it should engender cooperation and partnership, but if you let republicans take control partnership becomes abusive

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That link doesn’t seem to work, can you post it as a normal link? Would love to read it

  • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Part of the response should be to remove everything put in place to appease Trump. Pull back the new border plan, take away the fentanyl czar, remove the terrorist designation from cartels (and apologize to Mexico), etc.

    And I also like Doctorow’s idea of removing all the copyright protection shit we put in place to appease the U.S. in the past and anything else we can think of like that.

    • imvii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Part of the response should be to remove everything put in place to appease Trump.

      Some of it, yes. But I think improved security is needed at the border now more than ever.

        • imvii@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I’m more interested in securing it for who is moving from US to Canada.

          • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            But what was put in place recently won’t do anything for that.

            Now that I think about it, we should drastically reduce security going south (even beyond removing what was set up in the last month) to enable smuggling to get around the tariffs.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not trying to victim blame here, but Canada’s mistake was thinking these tariffs had anything to do with fentanyl or border security. These tariffs are literally just an ego thing for Trump. Outside of building a giant golden Trump monument and gifting it to the US like the Statue of Liberty, I don’t think there’s much they could have done.

    Either that or take a note from Putin and find some kompromat.

    • IronKrill@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I wouldn’t call it a mistake, personally. Even knowing the farce that it is, acting nice gave us an extra 30 days to talk deals with other leaders plus gives us the moral highground to say we tried before beginning a counter with full resolve. Any concessions we gave were small.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      We obviously don’t think the US is genuine in their justification and the statement is designed to highlight how patently ridiculous it is.

      The fentanyl/border security tariff allowance is just a thin justification to avoid outright violating the terms of the treaty Trump previously negotiated.

    • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As an American, I always assumed hate against him was like Canadian Fox News stuff. What did he (not?) do to turn people against him?

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I always assumed hate against him was like Canadian Fox News stuff.

        It mostly is, yes. The Conservative Party leader is very much a Maple Maga fanboy, and (like all Conservatives before him) he appeals to the Prairie provinces; the oil workers, farmers, truckers, etc… Your basic Fox news crowd. His father was also very disliked by the same crowd, and so his last name itself triggers them like you wouldn’t believe. (Think “Canadian Clintons”)

        But a large part of it (I initially thought), was also typical Canadian political trends. We tend to put the Liberals in power and then keep re-electing them long enough for them to inevitably become the villain (usually about a decade), and then over-correct and do the same thing with the Conservatives. Like clockwork, and it was coming up to about that time.

        Now, though, with Trudeau stepping down, and the promise of a new leader…combined with the general hatred of Pierre Poppinfresh, the Liberals fortunes have turned around 180 degrees. So it’s going to be an interesting federal election rather than the landslide that the Maple Maga fuckwits were expecting.

      • healthetank@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was hopeful when he got elected, and he fulfilled some promises, but he failed to move forward with proportional representation election overhaul, IMO a major flaw that could’ve been what he was known for in the future. He’s also had scandals like any other PM. The Me to We charity scandal (where a charity was awarded a large govt contract. The charity had previously paid Trudeau and family to appear at its events) was ultimately cleared by the ethics commissioner. His SNC lavalin scandal where he attempted to directly influence our justice minister to intervene on an ongoing criminal case, then removed her from her position when she refused. SNC lavalin was also found to have made illegal party donations, which the liberals didn’t reveal when the initially found them.

        He was also the first PM in history to have been found to break the federal ethics rules by accepting a private vacation for his family from Aga Khan, breaking the conflict of interest rules.

        He’s always paraded himself as very progressive, but images circulated of him wearing brown face when he was slightly younger (but definitely old enough to know better).

        Finally, a ton of people who were anti-mask were fed rhetoric that it was Trudeau’s fault for the masking requirements, despite the fact that it was almost entirely Provincial restrictions. They also tried to cry overreach when Ford failed to remove the Ottawa encampment, and Trudeau enacted the emergency act to clear them, though again, reviews after the fact cleared him and agreed it was an acceptable use of the powers.

        Overall, an enormous step up from Harper says of no transparency, but he didn’t quite live up to what many had hoped, and they’re angry at the current situation, and blaming him is an easy scapegoat.

      • yarn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly, people are just tired of him because he’s been in office so long and has failed to deliver on some old promises.

      • cheerytext1981@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 day ago

        He’s been in office for nearly a decade. Canadians are tired of him. Realistically, he hasn’t done anything worse than any other politician — you make promises, some you deliver on, some you don’t. Eventually, the “don’t”s pile up, and folks get tired

        • idunnololz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah i don’t really mind him. The one thing I am salty about is still the election reforms that he promised the first time he won. He was in a position to do something big but didnt. Such a missed opportunity.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        He only does something when backed into a corner. Otherwise he plays stupid political games and dresses up in costumes etc. I like crisis trudeau but not chilling trudeau.

        Also he promised to change FPTP as someone else pointed out which is why I voted for him.

    • Tencho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. I dont know if i remember a single positive thing he did before he announced his plan to resign from office. He’s been doing gods work lately.

      • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        2 days ago

        $10 a day child care was pretty good. I’m a fan of the dental coverage too. The carbon tax actually reduced our emissions for the first time and was overall a net financial benefit for most Canadians.

        He wasn’t amazing but he was not nearly the washout people act like he is.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        2 days ago

        Federal pandemic response was a mixed bag, but far from the shitshow of governing that some other countries experienced. Trudeau showed strong leadership through that period in my books.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I didn’t even feel like it was strong leadership, per se. It was more like a crisis arose and he listened to the experts. That isn’t a criticism, I think it was a sound choice, I just don’t think it necessarily qualifies as “strong leadership”. I wish we had more leaders listening to experts in their field and making decisions based on that.

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          the shitshow of governing that some other countries experienced.

          waves from the US

          And now we get more. I hate this timeline.

  • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honest question: Does anyone know if those tariffs apply retroactively? Say you purchased something a couple weeks ago, but it hasn’t crossed the border yet due to shipping delays, would it get taxed under the old rules? Or does it incur the tariff?

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I really wish they would stop phrasing it as if the tariffs are against countries. They are against the people of the country imposing the tariffs, in this case the US. And it just continues the false perception that China, Canada, etc are paying. I’m really disappointed that Canada is imposing tariffs on its people in retaliation. A better response would have been to launch a massive publicity campaign to encourage Canadians to boycott American products; maybe post en masse what products are from which countries. That seemed to be gaining traction in Canada without the campaign.

    Yes I do know that tariffs CAN negatively impact the county the tariff is imposed on, but face it, you can impose a 100% tariff on China and they can still undersell our products at half the cost and if they can’t, the Chinese government can just subsidize that product.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Politically an effort to be strong-armed must be answered in terms that the aggressor will perceive as strong. A call for a voluntary boycott will not cut it. It will also not be as effective at reducing reliance on US which Canada probably actually needs.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Agree to disagree. Taxing your own people in response is just as stupid as taxing your people to start with. It just reassures my belief that none of these politicians care about their people.

        • azuth@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Is your issue with tariffs vs voluntary boycott the removal of choice from the individual?

          • Professorozone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            As I said, my issue is it rarely affects the targeted country, but ALWAYS affects the targeting country since it’s THAT country that pays the tariff. It’s literally a tax imposed on citizens in hopes that it will cause them to stop buying a product from another country.

            I’m the case of the US, we hardly make anything, so people just have to pay more. China doesn’t play fair so they can just subsidize the companies that make our products. Plus many of their products cost so much less than ours you can pay extra and still save money over buying American.

            The last time Trump was president he imposed tariffs on washing machines, making them more expensive than foreign machines. What happened? American companies raised the price of their machines to match, negating any benefit of the tariff. I’m addition they raised the price of dryers, which people often buy at the same time.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could suspend all/most tariffs from China while “illegitmate/unjustified” extortion is in place. That could help retailers with US crossborder shopping into Canada, and encourage US to drop tariffs quickly before alternate supply chains/brands take hold in Canada.

    It doesn’t make sense for Auto industry to start new US investments if tariffs go away in 2 or 4 years. But auto sector commitment to Canada is needed to not shift our auto consumption to better value imports. “National security” restrictions on FDI from China in our resource sector have to be eliminated today. Negotiate processing plants for resources in Canada, to ship more finished products elsewhere, but we need to stop having only US control our economy/security.

    US behaviour is unacceptable and based on lies. There is no negotiation that will work with such terrorists. Need to start permanent structural economic/security shifts now, and force US to beg forgiveness for their mistake.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why do you have such a hard on to trade with china? The country who has a an opaque court to go after trade partners in Canada?

      You never seem to promote Africa other asian countries, europe (outside of russia) unless prompted.

      Edit: I keep forgetting South and Central America, don’t mean to not include them. Unlike sprial.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also need to immediately remove terrorist designation of Mexican cartels (Excuse that entitles US to war on Mexico). Ships from China can help Canada Mexico trade bypassing US roads/rail if that is affected. Agriculture has important Mexican sourcing, and we have supply that competes with US. Auto parts trade can help smooth production in both countries.

      The direct oppossite of US sycophancy that has been applied prior to these tariffs needs to be Canadian policy. It plays into the divisiveness of the world that US profits from.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        First, China makes stuff that competes with what little the US makes. They also buy a lot of stuff. As a country that can stand up to US, protecting their trade with Canada could at least result in a UN security council objection to invasion.

        The US was by far the greatest evil in the world prior to Trump, but instead of hoping for CIA/deepstate evil against world, the US empire’s shift to explicit extortion/war on allies, and by far the biggest threat to Canada, explaining facts about fentanyl and fair trade balance is not an effective response. Trump/cabinet knows they are lying instead of mistaken.

        Aggressive moves to diversify trade now instead of waiting for war to roll out is needed. By all means sell stuff to Europe/Africa/South America, but China is a big market, and can sell us substitutes for everything US. Cancel US weapons contracts. Boeing orders.

        Playing into US hands to amplify divisiveness between us, China, Mexico is path to defeat. We need to be on team delete America, and divisiveness is team USA. Other NATO colonies will also be offered a path of divisiveness to increase their sycophancy to US. The Asian ones are so far spared, but may side with US, as their traditional CIA coopted sycophants are politically entrenched to servitude rather than “these supposed values we all BS about”.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Being US vassal state was the weakness that exposed us to this war. Absolute devotion to “that nostalgia” is not best defense of Canadians.

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              So, switching to china is better?

              Fuck off with that tankie bullshit. If you want an ally on the un security council: France and Britian are better allies (and current ones).

              The amount of china based solutions you peddle is hilariously transparent as to who you align with, and that’s not Canada.