• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is your hourly reminder that Brave is still Chromium and still contributes to Google’s influence over internet standards.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate to be a pessimist but if people hate Musk as much as they seem to, but can’t leave twitter,

    or post “Fuck Spez” thousands of times, but won’t leave reddit,

    I’m cautious about how much of an exodous I expect to see from chrome.

    I think its time we face the fact that most people will trade almost anything for convenience.

    • Kerrigor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The piece that gets continuously underestimated is who moves in these small initial jumps. It tends to be the more technically inclined, who over the next couple years, their recommendations will lead to friends and family moving as well, at a slower rate.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The piece that gets continuously underestimated is who moves in these small initial jumps. It tends to be the more technically inclined, who over the next couple years, their recommendations will lead to friends and family moving as well, at a slower rate.

        Sure. And here we are. I’m sure these companies consider us a real fly in the ointment. But I’m not inclined to believe the past is perfectly predictive of the future. What you described is also, in my perspective, how things have gone in the past. But will it happen the same way this time? I don’t know. I’m not confident based on what I’ve seen. They are trying to close in the walls on the internet and they are confident that people are too lazy to stop them.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Internet Explorer managed to fall from 96% market share to complete irrelevance, Chrome is not immortal either.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You arent wrong. But, acectdata and mine own, convenience drove that. People are fucking lazy and hate nothing more than to be inconvenienced. When chrome was getting traction, explorer was trasshhhhhhhhh and every one knew it.

        Chrome might be a bit bloated but its no explorer. If it doesn’t hurt people to stay, I don’t think we’ll see a shift.

      • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Back then internet users werent normies, but nreds and tech savy people. Also, chrome learned from IE’s mistakes. It wont stop functioning and will keep updating, so the average normy user wont mind.

          • Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I genuinely don’t know how Ill use the web without ad block. Cause I damn sure ain’t going back to paying for anti-virus like in the 90’s for a web experience that is objectively worse and less magical enough to risk it.

            Drive by malware and viruses from ads has gotten scarily good at infecting systems without you knowing. It’s worse than ever as it’s not just a sketchy site issue thing anymore either. Even reputable sites have ads that only take one misclick to infect you now

    • manucode@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Browsers at least, unlike social networks, don’t benefit from networking effects. How many people use a specific browser doesn’t directly affect the usefulness of that browser, as users of different browsers can interact with each other to the same degree as users of the same browser. For now at least, as Google’s Web Integrity API could obviously change that if websites start to require and some browser are unable or unwilling to provide it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        How many people use a specific browser doesn’t directly affect the usefulness of that browser, as users of different browsers can interact with each other to the same degree as users of the same browser. For now at least, as Google’s Web Integrity API could obviously change that if websites start to require and some browser are unable or unwilling to provide it.

        Thats a great point and something to consider.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. I MUST use Edge at work and honestly, its fine. Its not some radical departure from Firefox, i dont have to think too hard about the differences.

    • umulu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to Firefox on windows and android on the same day as I saw that WEI bullshit.

      I don’t know why the fuck I was thinking it would be a worse experience… It’s the same thing.

    • Spudwart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google broke on Firefox for a while a day ago for me. Went to some other search engine.

      Jumping from social media is hard.

      Jumping from applications is not.

      teamspeak became Skype which became discord.

      And many of us did leave Reddit. I didn’t even leave because I cared about the protests or what Reddit was doing. I left because many posts were deleted, people left, subreddits became abandoned.

      Lemmy became better than Reddit basically overnight.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a slow process, most will still use it, but it will be less and less as time passes.

      Twitter is a different beast, most of the people you follow on twitter are only active in certain groups.

      All we can do is inform them and focus on what we do, no need to be stuck on what others do.

  • Hobbes@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just switched yesterday after learning more about why I should here in Lemmy.

    The last time I tried FF (many years ago) it was incredibly slow, so I went with chrome. But the FF of today is actually noticably quicker.

    Also, FF offered to import all of my bookmarks, autofills, passwords, history, and even my extensions (if a FF version exists of course, almost all of which did) and did so seamlessly. It was the easiest software switch ever.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apart from privacy concerns, Google has started to add some really bad features to Chrome, such as “Manifest V3” and “Web Environment Integrity”. These limit your ability to block ads or generally modify your device or the websites you’re visiting, and are just a bad for the web as a whole. WEI in particular is basically DRM for the web, so Google checks your device and denies you access to websites if they don’t like it. But as long as the majority of people keep using Chrome they can just force these things onto everyone.

    • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friggin’ Chromebook (which works great) can’t install FF.

      I’ve tried rooting into Ubuntu, but, I can’t get it all straightened out. Until I notice truly diminished issues… I’ll use Chromebook as is.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even as an Android app? I’ve run Firefox from crostini as well but the Android approach is a lot easier.

    • Hangglide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried FF earlier this year. It sucked. Everything just took extra clicks. The password manager was a pain and didn’t interact with my phone apps properly.

      I know the complaints against chrome. When it starts forcing me to watch ads I might try FF again.

      • pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, at least installing a foss browser won’t slow down your phone like a spyware app, you could always try something like Mull even for only a portion of your browsing if you have ~80MB to spare. I suggest it because I hate some of that extra bullshit that comes with standard Firefox. Also there’s tons of projects that try similar stuff with Chromium! Like Mulch. Way better defaults than Chrome

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Android FF is not a great user experience for sure. On desktop it’s just fine but Android is janky. I tolerate anyway to support Firefox but chrome is miles better on mobile.

  • DireDazzle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    Showing people that they can avoid ads by switching from chromium might make more people use adblockers.

    I get flabbergasted whenever I talk to someone and realize they’re unaware that such things exist. I hope all (according to the google store entry for ublock origin) 10,000,000 of the ublock origin users switches from chromium based browsers to, say, firefox…

    Feels like chromium is the new internet explorer…

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why Google is trying to launch the “Web Integrity API” that will essentially allow them to mandate any website accessible to or using Google Services to ban browsers that have ad blockers.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know a lot of Chrome users, and the general story I get from them is nearly always the same infuriating bullshit along these lines:

      “So, I tried the like, Fox Fire thingy, but this one time, like, it took, like, 1.5 seconds to load, so it’s “””“”“”““slow””“”“”“”" so I just use Chrome 'cause it’s, like, faster and stuff."

      Yeah, and I suppose the 427 useless things you have running in your system tray right now don’t have anything to do with your computer being “slow,” right?

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me it looks like a tech savy kind of hurdle, once people learn about it and start thinkering they start to use it also.

      Better for us when people start caring for what they tolerate from corps.

    • fat_stig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The available extensions are limited, but tampermonkey gives you access to lots of custom extension opportunities, I use it to make Twitter bearable.

      • sokz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        They just announced that all extensions will be available for Firefox Mobile by the end of the year.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You wish that was happening.

    I’m preparing to be completely unsurprised that Firefox’s market share will still be at 3% next month and the month after that.

    • propaganja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that 3% is made up of an outsized share of power users they might be ok. I’m more worried about the power structure shenanigans that have been going on the past few years.

    • Deebster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I alway wonder how underreported the Firefox figures are by things like that its users are generally more technical/privacy aware (so are blocking the trackers that report these numbers) and also spiders and bots often pretend to to Chrome (inflating those numbers).

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I had to choose between a tracked, ad-filled experience and a slower, protected experience, I would go back to 1990s style Internet in a second.

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A few years back when Firefox went through the whole “Quantum” update, I jumped and never looked back. It’s just better in every way, in my opinion.

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a user of Linux and primarily FOSS software for 2 years, each time I recommended something FOSS, others had bad luck.

    • I tried switching someone to Linux but I couldn’t achive %100 funnctionality on a Windows only app I set up via Wine. (it is an obscure program, not sth like Adobe or MS Office)
    • I recommended Kdenlive to a Mac user friend, he couldn’t export a video he spent 30 hours on it.
    • I convinced someone to use Libreoffice but they lost data in only 30 mins because I forgot to tell that if you draw more than a few strokes in LO Draw it enters a save loop. This is fixed now thankfully.
    • I recommended VLC for DVD ripping, it entered some sort of loop and failed to export.

    Each of the above examples involve completely different people, by the way.

    • I set up 2 fresh Windows installs for family but installed Firefox with strict protection and uBlock Origin instead of Chrome and… it worked?! They still use Firefox. Maybe the alpenglow theme is too good, I don’t know.
    • RivenRise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right and it’s that sort of stuff that people like you and me will deal with and figure out and move on but unfortunately it’s not the case with regular people. That’s why I never recommend that sorry if stuff to ‘normies’ ie. My mom. Instead I set them up with the lesser of evils that will give them convenience and make them more likely to trust me in the future. That way, if I ever REALLY need them to move on from something they will be more likely to just listen to me and not fight me about it. I just got a couple of friends to switch over to Firefox even though they were chrome fans, all because I have years of goodwill. Ported their bookmarks and got them ublock and they barely even notice a difference.

      • persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is true for everything… we just notice it when we’re the ones ahead.

        Some people can’t change tires, some can’t cook, some can do basic plumbing, some can’t remove appendixes, some can’t swim… whatever.

        Granted, I think the main divide were all on the good side of is “some people know how to search, some people don’t”

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the advantage for google of doing this move? People “savy” enough to install an adblock (or even know that it exists) is most likely to switch to a competitor that allows for adblocking

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Majority will keep using, for a while, until years later more see what has happened and move.

      Mean while profits on marketing go up.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mhm, I see that point, although I find it concerning given that the quality of the UX platforms like youtube has kept a consistent decline over the past decade. It feels like google keeps amassing more and more reasons for people to enable adblockers but I also understand youtube needs to be a profitable business and at some point you need to show ads

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, these are the challenges of freeware, ads are required unless you pay or become a pirate.

          Youtubers/social media now mostly have promotions within videos, so we went back to how cable functions.

          Thoughts on Social media/Rumble/twitter and other video platforms will evolve over time?

          I think Alphabet (Google) will keep doing things that make people leave there other platforms, youtube will take a while so changes will be more gradual.

          • egeres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a small note, in an unexpected turn of events, that “sponsor block” extension popped up also blocking promotions, I find it incredibly amazing that blocking ads can even go that further

            I can’t put my finger on it, but somehow I feel like youtube is irreplaceable, I don’t say this out of some internet patriotism, I just think the initial momentum of inertia really has to be massive to make it budge, while with fediverse-stuff you can gradually generate content and maybe some people will be attracted (?)

            And twitter’s trajectory is to fucking weird and unpredictable right now that I just have no clue 🙃🙃🙃

            • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Awesome, I did not know blocking sponsers was a thing, wow.

              Yes, you are right, youtube will be harder to leave for people, but Tiktok/twitter/etc. are grabbing the attention away from yt.

              They all are trying to keep you on their platform as much as possible, for ads and data collection.

              The new big thing may be bettet at that…?

              Thanks for your input!

              • egeres@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh yes, you’re right, tiktok is really eating youtube’s meal… and about the new big thing, hums, I’m not sure how it would look like 🤔

                Thank you for your input as well!! 🙌🏻✨

                • jigsaw250@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  TikTok is definitely hitting for certain demographics, but YouTube is still king in the long form department and I don’t see that changing unless they completely alienate their watchers and creators or someone comes along and offers significantly more money (to creators).

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It won’t be a change no one notices though. Even non-savvy people who use ad-blockers are obviously going to notice that the internet suddenly became a significantly terrible experience.

    • suspecm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way things are going with data collection and advertising, the EU is bound to put heavy restrictions on it, basically killing the market Google is built on. They are trying to find a middle ground between banning data collection and full on everything being collected you do online, and if ad blockers just happen to die in the crossfire, it’s not Google’s concern.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s a two-pronged attack.

      They have the Trust API changes they are trying to push, which I believe they may try to make websites only support browsers using that API. They have a largest user base already so they have some sway, if Chrome won’t load your webpage, you business might be dead.

      Couple that with their anti ad blocking extension, users have to use Chrome to access webpages and can’t block ads on those pages.

      Mildly tinfoil-hatty, but I think within the realm of possibility.

  • gi1242@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think firefox should ship with ublock origin installed. (Perhaps also containers).

    Hopefully then more people will migrate faster

  • desto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the old days I used Firefox exclusively, until my work started only supporting chrome so I kinda went with it and switched. Out of habit I continued until a couple of years ago, that I went full Firefox again and I remembered why I loved it.

  • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    people when they learn about unlock origin works better with firefox

    I bet most people saying chrome is faster don’t even know about adblockers or are using Google’s websites

    • Mellibird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I made the switch I was shocked at well it blocks ads. It still surprises me to this day. Yeah, it takes a little longer to load, but I couldn’t care less.